World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 58 4155 3811 368 336 196 12729

Roi Cohen Kadosh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roi Cohen Kadosh between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roi Cohen Kadosh published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2023. 13 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2023. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roi Cohen Kadosh: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 4
2007 9
2008 13
2009 11
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 20
2014 12
2015 12
2016 14
2017 14
2018 12
2019 10
2020 12
2021 20
2022 16
2023 22
2024 5
2025 8
Total 233
Download as CSV

Roi Cohen Kadosh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roi Cohen Kadosh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 196 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 196
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Roi Cohen Kadosh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roi Cohen Kadosh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334 58
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Roi Cohen Kadosh is affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom and has a research focus in the field of Neuroscience, with a significant contribution to Cognitive Neuroscience. Their publication record includes 120 works in Neuroscience, with 74 publications specifically in Cognitive Neuroscience. Subfields of study also include Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Statistics and Probability, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's research encompasses topics related to brain function and cognitive processes, with notable focus areas such as:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Roi Cohen Kadosh include:

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • Scaffolding the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder brain using transcranial direct current and random noise stimulation: A randomized controlled trial, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • The impact of a lack of mathematical education on brain development and future attainment, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial, 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • When randomisation is not good enough: Matching groups in intervention studies, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Their frequent co-authors include Francesco Sella, George Zacharopoulos, Shachar Hochman, Nienke E. R. van Bueren, and Sanne H.G. van der Ven. This reflects a collaborative research approach across multiple studies and topics.

Roi Cohen Kadosh's works are published in venues with multiple contributions such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Stimulation, Clinical Neurophysiology, Advanced Science, and PLoS Biology. These journals and archives reflect a consistent focus on cutting-edge developments in brain science and neurostimulation.

In addition to journal articles, Roi Cohen Kadosh has contributed to book literature, including a publication with Oxford University Press titled The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2020).

The scientist received the Spearman Medal from the British Psychological Society in 2014, an acknowledgment within the academic community.

Best Publications

  • Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation.

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Jan Lammertyn;Veronique Izard

  • The roles of cortical oscillations in sustained attention

    Michael S. Clayton;Nick Yeung;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • Optimizing functional accuracy of tms in cognitive studies: A comparison of methods

    Alexander T. Sack;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Teresa Schuhmann;Michelle Moerel

  • Modulating Neuronal Activity Produces Specific and Long-Lasting Changes in Numerical Competence

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Sonja Soskic;Teresa Iuculano;Teresa Iuculano;Ryota Kanai

  • Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Vincent Walsh

  • Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation

    Beatrix Krause;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Amanda Kaas;Amanda Kaas;Avishai Henik

  • Long-Term Enhancement of Brain Function and Cognition Using Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation

    Albert Snowball;Ilias Tachtsidis;Tudor Popescu;Jacqueline Thompson

  • Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI.

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Avishai Henik;Orly Rubinsten;Harald Mohr

  • Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Teresa Schuhmann;Amanda Kaas;Amanda Kaas

  • The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance?

    Beatrix Krause;Javier Márquez-Ruiz;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review.

    Titia Gebuis;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Wim Gevers

  • The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Neil Levy;Neil Levy;Jacinta O'Shea;Nicholas Shea

  • The many characters of visual alpha oscillations.

    Michael S. Clayton;Nick Yeung;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe.

    Marinella Cappelletti;Erica Gessaroli;Rosalyn Hithersay;Micaela Mitolo

  • Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity.

    Thomas Reed;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;David E. J. Linden;Wim Gevers

  • Prevalence, characteristics and a neurocognitive model of mirror-touch synaesthesia

    Michael J. Banissy;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Gerrit W. Maus;Gerrit W. Maus;Vincent Walsh

  • Developmental Changes in Effective Connectivity in the Emerging Core Face Network

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Frederic Dick;Mark H. Johnson

  • Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Anna-Katharine Brem;Anna-Katharine Brem;Erica Levenbaum;Todd Thompson

  • Can synaesthesia research inform cognitive science

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Avishai Henik

Frequent Co-Authors

Avishai Henik
Avishai Henik Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Vincent Walsh
Vincent Walsh University College London
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh University of Surrey
Devin Blair Terhune
Devin Blair Terhune Goldsmiths University of London
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Wim Gevers
Wim Gevers Université Libre de Bruxelles
Luis J. Fuentes
Luis J. Fuentes University of Murcia
Joseph Tzelgov
Joseph Tzelgov Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Neil Levy
Neil Levy Macquarie University
Julian Savulescu
Julian Savulescu University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens many doors in both academic and professional fields. Those interested in maximizing their earning potential might want to consider programs similar to neuroscience that are among the most lucrative college majors. These fields often overlap with neuroscience and offer strong career growth in research, data science, medicine, and technology.

Flexibility and affordability are important when choosing an online degree. Many students seek the best online colleges that accept fafsa, making it easier to finance higher education. These accredited programs enable you to advance your studies in neuroscience or related disciplines from anywhere.

For those wanting to quickly enter the workforce, consider enrolling in short certificate programs that pay well. Certificates in data analysis, healthcare, or psychology can complement a neuroscience background and accelerate your career.

If balancing studies with other life commitments is a priority, you may also want to review the easiest college majors available online. These majors could serve as a starting point or secondary focus while pursuing more advanced neuroscience goals.

Best Scientists Citing Roi Cohen Kadosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles