World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisa M. Barnett

Lisa M. Barnett

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3322 3059 173 168 273 20239

Lisa M. Barnett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa M. Barnett between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa M. Barnett published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2018. 28 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2018. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa M. Barnett: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 10
2004 4
2005 2
2006 3
2007 0
2008 5
2009 6
2010 6
2011 6
2012 7
2013 12
2014 13
2015 25
2016 20
2017 33
2018 34
2019 26
2020 26
2021 30
2022 20
2023 22
2024 24
2025 27
2026 1
Total 367
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Barnett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 273 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 273
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Barnett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa M. Barnett is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of psychology, medicine, and social sciences. Their work is particularly focused on developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, education, public health, and physical therapy.

The primary topics of Lisa M. Barnett's research include:

  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The scientist has published papers in several key academic journals. These include:

  • Journal of Sports Sciences (12 publications)
  • Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (10 publications)
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (10 publications)
  • Sports Medicine (8 publications)
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise (7 publications)

Among recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Lisa M. Barnett are:

  • "Through the Looking Glass: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Evidence, Providing New Insight for Motor Competence and Health," 2021, Sports Medicine
  • "Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world's child population under-represented in research," 2022, Infant and Child Development
  • "The Relationship Between Actual and Perceived Motor Competence in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," 2020, Sports Medicine
  • "Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: A systematic review," 2020, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • "Examining early adolescents' motivation for physical education: associations with actual and perceived motor competence," 2020, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy

Lisa M. Barnett frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Natalie Lander
  • Michael Duncan
  • Jo Salmon
  • Emiliano Mazzoli
  • Emma L. J. Eyre

Best Publications

  • Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits

    David R. Lubans;Philip J. Morgan;Dylan P. Cliff;Lisa M. Barnett

  • Motor Competence and its Effect on Positive Developmental Trajectories of Health

    Leah E. Robinson;David F. Stodden;Lisa M. Barnett;Vitor P. Lopes

  • Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity

    Lisa M. Barnett;Eric van Beurden;Philip J. Morgan;Lyndon O. Brooks

  • Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lisa M. Barnett;Samuel K. Lai;Sanne L. C. Veldman;Louise L. Hardy

  • Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    R. Hulteen;J. Smith;P. Morgan;L. Barnett

  • Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment

    Lisa M Barnett;Philip J Morgan;Eric van Beurden;John R Beard;John R Beard;John R Beard

  • Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Philip J. Morgan;Lisa M. Barnett;Dylan P. Cliff;Anthony D. Okely

  • Development of Foundational Movement Skills: A Conceptual Model for Physical Activity Across the Lifespan

    Ryan M. Hulteen;Philip J. Morgan;Lisa M. Barnett;David F. Stodden

  • Fundamental movement skills: an important focus

    Lisa M. Barnett;David Stodden;Kristen E. Cohen;Jordan J. Smith

  • Does childhood motor skill proficiency predict adolescent fitness

    Lisa M. Barnett;Eric Van Beurden;Philip J. Morgan;Lyndon O. Brooks

  • Gender differences in motor skill proficiency from childhood to adolescence : a longitudinal study

    Lisa M. Barnett;Eric van Beurden;Philip J. Morgan;Lyndon O. Brooks

  • A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents

    David Lubans;Kylie Hesketh;Dylan Cliff;Lisa Barnett

  • The Health Indicators Associated With Screen-Based Sedentary Behavior Among Adolescent Girls: A Systematic Review

    Sarah A. Costigan;Lisa Barnett;Ronald C. Plotnikoff;David R. Lubans

  • Do school-based interventions focusing on physical activity, fitness, or fundamental movement skill competency produce a sustained impact in these outcomes in children and adolescents? A systematic review of follow-up studies

    Samuel K. Lai;Sarah A. Costigan;Philip J. Morgan;David R. Lubans

  • A Reverse Pathway? Actual and Perceived Skill Proficiency and Physical Activity

    Lisa M. Barnett;Philip J. Morgan;Eric van Beurden;Kylie Ball

  • Can we skill and activate children through primary school physical education lessons? "Move it Groove it"—a collaborative health promotion intervention

    E.van Beurden;L.M Barnett;A Zask;U.C Dietrich

  • Through the Looking Glass: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Evidence, Providing New Insight for Motor Competence and Health

    Lisa M Barnett;E Kipling Webster;Ryan M Hulteen;An De Meester

  • Active school playgrounds-myth or reality? Results of the "move it groove it" project.

    A. Zask;E. van Beurden;L. Barnett;L.O. Brooks

  • Thirteen-Year Trends in Child and Adolescent Fundamental Movement Skills: 1997–2010

    Louise L Hardy;Lisa M Barnett;Paola Espinel;Anthony D Okely

  • Physical activity, sedentary behavior and their correlates in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review.

    Rachel A. Jones;Katherine Downing;Nicole J. Rinehart;Lisa M. Barnett

  • Effect of changes to the school food environment on eating behaviours and/or body weight in children: a systematic review

    C. E. Driessen;A. J. Cameron;A. J. Cameron;L. E. Thornton;S. K. Lai

  • A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository

    D. R. Lubans;K. Hesketh;D. P. Cliff;L. M. Barnett

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Morgan
Philip J. Morgan University of Newcastle Australia
Jo Salmon
Jo Salmon Deakin University
David R. Lubans
David R. Lubans University of Newcastle Australia
Beth Newman
Beth Newman Queensland University of Technology
Steven Allender
Steven Allender Deakin University
Anthony D. Okely
Anthony D. Okely University of Wollongong
Richard Keegan
Richard Keegan University of Canberra
Nicole Joan Rinehart
Nicole Joan Rinehart Monash University
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
Remco Polman
Remco Polman Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens diverse career opportunities, from counseling to social work. Many online programs offer flexible pathways to meet state-specific requirements, allowing students to specialize in areas like clinical psychology, behavioral analysis, or social work. Understanding regional differences in education and licensing is crucial for aspiring professionals.

For those interested in social work, requirements vary by state. The Idaho minimum degree requirement for social workers is typically a bachelor’s degree in social work, while the Illinois minimum degree requirement for social workers includes both bachelor’s and master’s options, depending on the level of licensure pursued.

Similarly, social worker education requirements in Indiana and Iowa education requirements for social workers emphasize accredited degrees and possible postgraduate study for advanced roles.

By choosing an online psychology program aligned with your state’s standards, you’ll be well-prepared for a rewarding career in mental health, education, social services, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Barnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles