World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin H. Steinberg

Martin H. Steinberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7874 7403 4101 3792 566 44696

Martin H. Steinberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin H. Steinberg between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin H. Steinberg published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2009. 18 of the 590 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2009. 1970: 5 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 8 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 45 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
1970 2025

590 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin H. Steinberg: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 5
1971 3
1972 1
1973 8
1974 4
1975 3
1976 3
1977 4
1978 3
1979 5
1980 4
1981 7
1982 8
1983 6
1984 6
1985 3
1986 7
1987 7
1988 3
1989 1
1990 4
1991 15
1992 4
1993 6
1994 7
1995 6
1996 10
1997 10
1998 5
1999 10
2000 12
2001 10
2002 5
2003 13
2004 21
2005 23
2006 27
2007 18
2008 22
2009 45
2010 18
2011 18
2012 27
2013 19
2014 24
2015 15
2016 13
2017 20
2018 11
2019 8
2020 10
2021 8
2022 10
2023 7
2024 10
2025 8
Total 590
Download as CSV

Martin H. Steinberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H. Steinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 566
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin H. Steinberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin H. Steinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 101
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Martin H. Steinberg is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant work in the subfields of genetics, hematology, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, molecular biology, and physiology. The main topics Steinberg covers include hemoglobinopathies and related disorders, iron metabolism and disorders, prenatal screening and diagnostics, blood groups and transfusion, erythrocyte function and pathophysiology, parvovirus B19 infection studies, and RNA modifications and cancer.

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as Blood, the American Journal of Hematology, Expert Review of Hematology, British Journal of Haematology, and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Blood stands out as a frequent publication venue, featuring twelve of their works, followed by nine publications in the American Journal of Hematology.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin H. Steinberg include:

  • Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia, 2020, Blood
  • Fetal Hemoglobin in Sickle Hemoglobinopathies: High HbF Genotypes and Phenotypes, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Additionally, Steinberg has collaborated on several papers with collaborator Haydar Frangoul, such as "CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and β-Thalassemia" (2020, New England Journal of Medicine), and "Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease" (2024, New England Journal of Medicine), though Steinberg is not listed as author on these.

Frequent co-authors working with Martin H. Steinberg include:

  • Haydar Frangoul
  • Franco Locatelli
  • Stephan A. Grupp
  • Markus Y. Mapara
  • Mariane de Montalembert

Martin H. Steinberg was awarded the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1989.

Best Publications

  • Mortality In Sickle Cell Disease -- Life Expectancy and Risk Factors for Early Death

    Orah S. Platt;Donald J. Brambilla;Wendell F. Rosse;Paul F. Milner

  • CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and β-Thalassemia

    Haydar Frangoul;David Altshuler;M. Domenica Cappellini;Yi-Shan Chen

  • Mental and Behavioral Disturbances in Dementia: Findings from the Cache County Study on Memory in Aging

    Constantine G. Lyketsos;Martin Steinberg;Jo Ann T. Tschanz;Maria C. Norton

  • Effect of Hydroxyurea on Mortality and Morbidity in Adult Sickle Cell Anemia: Risks and Benefits Up to 9 Years of Treatment

    Martin H. Steinberg;Martin H. Steinberg;Franca Barton;Oswaldo Castro;Charles H. Pegelow

  • Deconstructing sickle cell disease: Reappraisal of the role of hemolysis in the development of clinical subphenotypes

    Gregory J. Kato;Mark T. Gladwin;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Sickle Cell Disease.

    Frédéric B Piel;Martin H Steinberg;David C Rees

  • Management of Sickle Cell Disease

    Martin H. Steinberg

  • Point and 5-year period prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: The Cache county study

    Martin Steinberg;Huibo Shao;Peter Zandi;Constantine G. Lyketsos

  • Intravascular hemolysis and the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease

    Gregory J. Kato;Martin H. Steinberg;Mark T. Gladwin

  • Erythrocyte adherence to endothelium in sickle-cell anemia. A possible determinant of disease severity.

    Robert P. Hebbel;Marc A. B. Boogaerts;John W. Eaton;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia

    Idowu Akinsheye;Abdulrahman Alsultan;Nadia Solovieff;Duyen Ngo

  • Disorders of Hemoglobin: Genetics, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management

    Martin H. Steinberg;Bernard G. Forget;Douglas R. Higgs;David J. Weatherall

  • Genetic signatures of exceptional longevity in humans.

    Paola Sebastiani;Nadia Solovieff;Andrew T. DeWan;Kyle M. Walsh

  • Spontaneous oxygen radical generation by sickle erythrocytes.

    Robert P. Hebbel;John W. Eaton;M. Balasingam;Martin H. Steinberg

  • The risks and benefits of long-term use of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: A 17.5 year follow-up

    Martin H. Steinberg;William F. McCarthy;Oswaldo Castro;Samir K. Ballas

  • Differential modulation of endotoxin responsiveness by human caspase-12 polymorphisms

    Maya Saleh;John P. Vaillancourt;Rona K. Graham;Matthew Huyck

  • Treating depression in Alzheimer disease: Efficacy and safety of sertraline therapy, and the benefits of depression reduction: The DIADS

    Constantine G. Lyketsos;Lourdes DelCampo;Martin Steinberg;Quincy Miles

  • Do statins reduce risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer disease? The Cache county study

    Peter P. Zandi;D. Larry Sparks;Ara S. Khachaturian;JoAnn T. Tschanz

  • Hydroxyurea and Sickle Cell Anemia: Clinical Utility of a Myelosuppressive "Switching" Agent

    Samuel Charache;Franca B. Barton;Richard D. Moore;Michael L. Terrin

  • Effect of Hydroxyurea on Mortality and Morbidity in Adult Sickle Cell Anemia

    Martin H. Steinberg;Franca Barton;Oswaldo Castro;Charles H. Pegelow

Frequent Co-Authors

David H.K. Chui
David H.K. Chui Boston University
Clinton T. Baldwin
Clinton T. Baldwin Boston University
Constantine G. Lyketsos
Constantine G. Lyketsos Johns Hopkins University
Lindsay A. Farrer
Lindsay A. Farrer Boston University
Mark T. Gladwin
Mark T. Gladwin University of Pittsburgh
John C.S. Breitner
John C.S. Breitner Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Gregory J. Kato
Gregory J. Kato CSL Behring
JoAnn T. Tschanz
JoAnn T. Tschanz Utah State University
Victor R. Gordeuk
Victor R. Gordeuk University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new career pathways in healthcare and expand your skill set beyond traditional medical studies. Many prospective students look for flexible, affordable programs to balance work and learning.

If you are considering management roles, pursuing one of the cheapest online mha degrees could be a smart choice, as it can prepare you for leadership positions in hospitals and clinics.

For those interested in advanced clinical practice, there are cheapest dnp online programs available, designed for nurses aspiring to become nurse practitioners or take on higher-responsibility roles.

If pharmacy is your passion, exploring a pharmacy degree online can offer convenience while preparing you for a rewarding career in pharmaceutical care.

Administrative and data-driven roles are also in demand, making a bachelor of health information management online a highly valued credential for those interested in healthcare technology and information services.

Each of these online pathways offers distinct advantages and opportunities for specialization, allowing you to tailor your career in healthcare and meet the evolving demands of the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Martin H. Steinberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles