World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5107
World Ranking
10843
National Ranking
1054

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
5120
World Ranking
9512
National Ranking
705

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Cohen Kadosh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Cohen Kadosh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh is affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, with significant contributions across cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work addresses topics that include:

  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Infant health and development

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh has authored papers such as:

  • "Nutritional Support of Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Function in Infants and Young Children-An Update and Novel Insights," 2021, published in Nutrients
  • "Psychobiotic Interventions for Anxiety in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, with Youth Consultation," 2021, published in Translational Psychiatry

Other frequently co-authored papers appearing in the data but led by other authors reference overlapping fields and collaborative research areas relevant to their work.

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Nicola Johnstone
  • Melissa Basso
  • Catharina Zich
  • Amelie Haugg
  • Ronald Sladky

Publication venues frequently used by the scientist are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nutrients
  • NeuroImage
  • Scientific Reports
  • Translational Psychiatry

The scientific contributions span studies of brain function, nutrition's impact on development, and gut-brain interactions, demonstrating a cross-disciplinary approach integrating neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. The blend of research into cognitive development, anxiety, and gut microbiota highlights a focus on bio-psychosocial factors affecting mental health and neurodevelopment.

Best Publications

  • The social brain in adolescence: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies

    Stephanie Burnett;Catherine Sebastian;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  • Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Amanda Kaas;Amanda Kaas;Avishai Henik

  • THE ROLE OF PEER REJECTION IN ADOLESCENT DEPRESSION

    Belinda Platt;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Jennifer Y.F. Lau

  • Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Teresa Schuhmann;Amanda Kaas;Amanda Kaas

  • Developing a cortex specialized for face perception.

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Mark H. Johnson

  • Mapping functional brain development: Building a social brain through interactive specialization

    Mark H. Johnson;Tobias Grossmann;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

  • The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;David E. J. Linden;Wim Gevers

  • Developmental Changes in Effective Connectivity in the Emerging Core Face Network

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Frederic Dick;Mark H. Johnson

  • Mental Chronometry of Working Memory Retrieval: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-Related Potentials Approach

    Christoph Bledowski;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Michael Wibral;Benny Rahm

  • Social anxiety disorder in adolescence: How developmental cognitive neuroscience findings may shape understanding and interventions for psychopathology.

    Simone P.W. Haller;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Gaia Scerif;Jennifer Y.F. Lau

  • When Brightness Counts: The Neuronal Correlate of Numerical–Luminance Interference

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Avishai Henik

  • A systematic review of the psychological factors that influence neurofeedback learning outcomes.

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Graham Staunton

  • The neuronal correlate of bidirectional synesthesia: A combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Avishai Henik

  • Nutritional Support of Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Function in Infants and Young Children-An Update and Novel Insights.

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Leilani Muhardi;Panam Parikh;Melissa Basso;Melissa Basso

  • Using real-time fMRI to influence effective connectivity in the developing emotion regulation network.

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Qiang Luo;Calem de Burca;Moses O. Sokunbi;Moses O. Sokunbi

  • Task-dependent activation of face-sensitive cortex: An fmri adaptation study

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Richard N. A. Henson;Roi Cohen Kadosh;Mark H. Johnson

  • Current progress in real-time functional magnetic resonance-based neurofeedback: Methodological challenges and achievements

    Christian Paret;Christian Paret;Christian Paret;Noam Goldway;Catharina Zich;Jackob Nimrod Keynan

  • Plasticity during childhood and adolescence: innovative approaches to investigating neurocognitive development.

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;David Edmund Johannes Linden;Jennifer Y.F. Lau

  • Effects of Age, Task Performance, and Structural Brain Development on Face Processing

    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Mark H Johnson;Frederic Dick;Roi Cohen Kadosh

  • Process-based framework for precise neuromodulation

    Nitzan Lubianiker;Nitzan Lubianiker;Noam Goldway;Noam Goldway;Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok;Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok;Christian Paret

  • Measuring online interpretations and attributions of social situations: Links with adolescent social anxiety.

    Simone P W Haller;Sophie M Raeder;Gaia Scerif;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Jennifer Y. F. Lau Queen Mary University of London
Roi Cohen Kadosh
Roi Cohen Kadosh University of Surrey
David Edmund Johannes Linden
David Edmund Johannes Linden Maastricht University
Talma Hendler
Talma Hendler Tel Aviv University
Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Avishai Henik
Avishai Henik Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore University of Cambridge
Gaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif University of Oxford
Dimitri Van De Ville
Dimitri Van De Ville École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Frederic Dick
Frederic Dick Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse and high-impact career paths in healthcare, research, biotechnology, and more. If you’re considering an alternative or supplementary educational route, there are many flexible online options. For students aiming to accelerate their journey, earning a bachelor degree online in 2 years is now possible at select institutions, allowing you to enter the workforce or graduate programs sooner.

It’s important to weigh your degree choice alongside potential salary outcomes. Explore the best bachelor degrees to get and browse the leading majors that make the most money to make an informed decision. Many neuroscience-related fields—such as biomedical engineering and computer science—frequently top these lists.

Affordability is also key. Prospective students can reduce costs by choosing online college courses with financial aid. Financial support can make your neuroscience or related degree more accessible, maximizing both your educational and financial future.

Best Scientists Citing Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles