World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Edmund Johannes Linden

David Edmund Johannes Linden

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
94
Citations
29081
World Ranking
952
National Ranking
30

Psychology

D-Index
93
Citations
28619
World Ranking
849
National Ranking
46

David Edmund Johannes Linden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Edmund Johannes Linden sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 407 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David Edmund Johannes Linden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Edmund Johannes Linden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Edmund Johannes Linden is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing heavily on medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad fields, their work addresses cognitive neuroscience, genetics, molecular biology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research topics include studies on functional brain connectivity, congenital heart defects, genetic associations and epidemiology, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and neural and behavioral psychology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by the scientist include:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • A Population-Based Cohort Study Examining the Incidence and Impact of Psychotic Experiences From Childhood to Adulthood, and Prediction of Psychotic Disorder, 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • The genetic architecture of human cortical folding, 2021, Science Advances
  • Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: Practical approaches and recommendations - insights from the Maastricht study, 2021, NeuroImage

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including Michael J. Owen, Marianne B. M. van den Bree, Jérémy Hall, Paul M. Thompson, and Thérèse van Amelsvoort.

Publication venues where their work appears most often include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Cerebral Cortex.

David Linden's work integrates multiple approaches within biomedical and neural sciences, addressing complex topics that intersect genetics, neuroimaging, and psychiatric research. Their publications highlight broad engagement with experimental design, clinical studies, and global data sharing initiatives, reflecting a comprehensive and interdisciplinary research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us?

    David Edmund Johannes Linden

  • Activation of Heschl’s Gyrus during Auditory Hallucinations

    Thomas Dierks;David Edmund Johannes Linden;David Edmund Johannes Linden;Martin Jandl;Elia Formisano

  • Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Christoph Bledowski;David Prvulovic;Karsten Hoechstetter;Michael Scherg

  • Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest.

    Vincent G. van de Ven;Elia Formisano;David Prvulovic;Christian H. Roeder

  • How psychotherapy changes the brain--the contribution of functional neuroimaging.

    David Edmund Johannes Linden

  • The Functional Neuroanatomy of Target Detection: An fMRI Study of Visual and Auditory Oddball Tasks

    David E.J. Linden;David Prvulovic;Elia Formisano;Martin Völlinger

  • Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges

    J. Sulzer;S. Haller;F. Scharnowski;F. Scharnowski;N. Weiskopf

  • Dysfunctional long-range coordination of neural activity during Gestalt perception in schizophrenia

    Peter J. Uhlhaas;David E. J. Linden;Wolf Singer;Corinna Haenschel

  • Real-Time Self-Regulation of Emotion Networks in Patients with Depression

    David Edmund Johannes Linden;David Edmund Johannes Linden;David Edmund Johannes Linden;Isabelle Habes;Isabelle Habes;Stephen J. Johnston;Stefanie Linden

  • Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network.

    David Edmund Johannes Linden;Robert A. Bittner;Lars Muckli;James A. Waltz

  • Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer disease: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy.

    Linda Clare;David E.J. Linden;Robert T. Woods;Rhiannon Whitaker

  • Resting-state functional network correlates of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia

    Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Vincent van de Ven;Viola Oertel-Knöchel;Peter J. Uhlhaas;Peter J. Uhlhaas

  • Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study

    Christoph Bledowski;David Prvulovic;Rainer Goebel;Friedhelm E. Zanella

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Cortical Oscillatory Activity Is Critical for Working Memory as Revealed by Deficits in Early-Onset Schizophrenia

    Corinna Haenschel;Robert A. Bittner;James Waltz;Fabian Haertling

  • Spatial pattern of cerebral glucose metabolism (PET) correlates with localization of intracerebral EEG-generators in Alzheimer's disease.

    Thomas Dierks;Thomas Dierks;Vesna Jelic;Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui;Lars-Olof Wahlund

  • Human auditory steady state potentials.

    Stapells Dr;Linden D;Suffield Jb;Hamel G

  • Neurofeedback: A promising tool for the self-regulation of emotion networks

    S. J. Johnston;S. G. Boehm;David Thomas Healy;R. Goebel

  • Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI.

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Avishai Henik;Orly Rubinsten;Harald Mohr

  • Tracking the mind's image in the brain I: time-resolved fMRI during visuospatial mental imagery.

    Elia Formisano;David E.J. Linden;Francesco Di Salle;Luigi Trojano

  • Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurofeedback for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

    Leena Subramanian;John Vincent Hindle;Stephen Johnston;Mark V. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
David Prvulovic
David Prvulovic Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University
Vincent van de Ven
Vincent van de Ven Maastricht University
Wolf Singer
Wolf Singer Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Jeremy Hall
Jeremy Hall Cardiff University
Elia Formisano
Elia Formisano Maastricht University
Konrad Maurer
Konrad Maurer Goethe University Frankfurt
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA offers a wide variety of online degree options and career opportunities. Many students looking to advance in fields such as counseling or mental health support find online degrees both flexible and highly respected. Programs often include coursework and practical experience designed to meet state-specific requirements.

When exploring this path, it’s important to understand that requirements for roles like mental health counselor can vary greatly by location. For example, to learn about Lexington mental health counselor education requirements, prospective students should review relevant local regulations and programs. Similarly, if you plan to become a mental health counselor in Lincoln, certain coursework and supervised experience might be necessary.

Students in California should note the mental health counselor requirements in Long Beach and the specialized paths for those aiming to meet Los Angeles mental health counselor certification requirements. Always consult your state’s licensing board and academic advisors to choose the degree program and career pathway that best suit your goals.

Best Scientists Citing David Edmund Johannes Linden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles