World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8378
World Ranking
6001
National Ranking
506

Konrad Maurer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konrad Maurer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 265 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Konrad Maurer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konrad Maurer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Dysfunctional long-range coordination of neural activity during Gestalt perception in schizophrenia

    Peter J. Uhlhaas;David E. J. Linden;Wolf Singer;Corinna Haenschel

  • Auguste D and Alzheimer's disease

    Konrad Maurer;Stephan Volk;Hector Gerbaldo

  • Spatial pattern of cerebral glucose metabolism (PET) correlates with localization of intracerebral EEG-generators in Alzheimer's disease.

    Thomas Dierks;Thomas Dierks;Vesna Jelic;Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui;Lars-Olof Wahlund

  • Clinical efficacy of Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761 in dementia of the Alzheimer type

    K. Maurer;R. Ihl;T. Dierks;L. Frölich

  • Elevated cytokine expression in the orbitofrontal cortex of victims of suicide

    Leonardo H. Tonelli;J. Stiller;J. Stiller;Dan Rujescu;Ina Giegling

  • Contribution of Impaired Early-Stage Visual Processing to Working Memory Dysfunction in Adolescents With Schizophrenia A Study With Event-Related Potentials and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Corinna Haenschel;Robert A. Bittner;Fabian Haertling;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela

  • Functional imaging of visuospatial processing in Alzheimer's disease.

    David Prvulovic;Daniela Hubl;Alexander Thomas Sack;L. Melillo

  • Specialization in the default mode: Task‐induced brain deactivations dissociate between visual working memory and attention

    Jutta S. Mayer;Alard Roebroeck;Konrad Maurer;David Edmund Johannes Linden

  • Mental Chronometry of Working Memory Retrieval: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-Related Potentials Approach

    Christoph Bledowski;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Michael Wibral;Benny Rahm

  • Differential validity of psychometric tests in dementia of the Alzheimer type.

    Ralf Ihl;Lutz Frölich;Thomas Dierks;Eva-Maria Martin

  • Dementia of the alzheimer type: Effects on the spontaneous EEG described by dipole sources

    Thomas Dierks;Ralf Ihl;Lutz Frölich;Konrad Maurer

  • Reduced laterality as a trait marker of schizophrenia--evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging.

    Viola Oertel;Christian Knochel;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Ralf Schonmeyer

  • Anatomical brain connectivity and positive symptoms of schizophrenia: A diffusion tensor imaging study

    Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Viola Oertel-Knoechel;Federico DeMartino;Vincent van de Ven

  • Deficits in High- (>60 Hz) Gamma-Band Oscillations During Visual Processing in Schizophrenia

    Christine Grützner;Michael Wibral;Limin Sun;Limin Sun;Davide Rivolta

  • IFCN recommended standards for long-latency auditory event-related potentials. Report of an IFCN committee

    Douglas Goodin;John Desmedt;Konrad Maurer;Marc R. Nuwer

  • Functional activation imaging in aging and dementia

    David Prvulovic;Vincent Van de Ven;Vincent Van de Ven;Alexander T. Sack;Alexander T. Sack;Konrad Maurer

  • Concordance of DSM-IV Axis I and II diagnoses by personal and informant's interview.

    Barbara Schneider;Konrad Maurer;Dieter Sargk;Harald Heiskel

  • Topography of the quantitative electroencephalogram in dementia of the Alzheimer type: relation to severity of dementia.

    Thomas Dierks;Ivanca Perisic;Lutz Frölich;Ralf Ihl

  • Treating Auditory Hallucinations by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

    Martin Jandl;Juergen Steyer;Martin Weber;David Edmund Johannes Linden

  • EEG-microstates in mild memory impairment and Alzheimer's disease: possible association with disturbed information processing.

    T. Dierks;V. Jelic;P. Julin;K. Maurer

  • Axis I disorders and personality disorders as risk factors for suicide.

    Barbara Schneider;Tilman Wetterling;Dieter Sargk;Fabian Schneider

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Dierks
Thomas Dierks University of Bern
David Edmund Johannes Linden
David Edmund Johannes Linden Maastricht University
Werner Strik
Werner Strik University of Bern
David Prvulovic
David Prvulovic Goethe University Frankfurt
Wolf Singer
Wolf Singer Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Anne Eckert
Anne Eckert University of Basel
Alessandro Serretti
Alessandro Serretti Kore University of Enna
H.-J. Möller
H.-J. Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to diverse career paths and flexible study options. Those seeking a high return on investment may look into the most lucrative degrees, where STEM fields—including neuroscience—often lead the way for top salaries and advancement.

For students balancing costs, there are online college courses with financial aid, making it more accessible to pursue your degree without overwhelming financial burden. Many accredited online programs now accept FAFSA, broadening opportunities for all learners.

If quick skill-building is a priority, numerous online certification programs offer focused training in neuroscience-adjacent fields like data analysis or healthcare technology, helping you boost your credentials in months rather than years.

Lastly, those seeking accelerated paths should explore easy bachelor degrees online. These programs can sometimes be combined with your core neuroscience interests, letting you earn a degree faster and more flexibly.

Best Scientists Citing Konrad Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles