World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 60 537 500 240 219 253 20263

Mary C. Lacity publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary C. Lacity between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary C. Lacity published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2009. 6 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2009. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary C. Lacity: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 8
1996 5
1997 8
1998 4
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 6
2004 5
2005 3
2006 16
2007 2
2008 19
2009 35
2010 3
2011 3
2012 20
2013 5
2014 15
2015 27
2016 17
2017 12
2018 6
2019 4
2020 4
2021 9
2022 8
2023 4
2024 5
2025 1
Total 278
Download as CSV

Mary C. Lacity publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Lacity sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 250–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 253 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23 253
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary C. Lacity D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Lacity sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48 60
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS)

Overview

Mary C. Lacity is a researcher affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their academic work spans fields including Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, focusing largely on Information Systems and Management Information Systems as subfields.

The research topics covered in Mary C. Lacity's publications include Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Digital Platforms and Economics, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Information Systems Theories and Implementation, and Business Process Modeling and Analysis.

Key recent papers authored by Mary C. Lacity include:

  • Becoming Strategic with Intelligent Automation, 2021, MIS Quarterly Executive
  • Blockchain: From Bitcoin to the Internet of Value and beyond, 2022, Journal of Information Technology
  • Influencing information systems practice: The action principles approach applied to robotic process and cognitive automation, 2021, Journal of Information Technology

Other notable publications not authored by Mary C. Lacity but reflective of related academic interests include:

  • Token Economy, 2021, Business & Information Systems Engineering
  • Consumer valuation of blockchain traceability for beef in the United States, 2021, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

Mary C. Lacity has coauthored frequently with several scholars, including Horst Treiblmaier, Leslie P. Willcocks, Remko van Hoek, Jeffrey K. Mullins, and Le Kuai. These collaborations have contributed to a range of publications in their research fields.

Their work is regularly published in several academic journals. The most frequent publication venues include MIS Quarterly Executive, Journal of Information Technology, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, The Journal of British Blockchain Association, and Business & Information Systems Engineering.

Mary C. Lacity has authored multiple books published by the University of Arkansas Press and Springer International Publishing. Significant titles include "Blockchain Foundations: For the Internet of Value" (2020), "Blockchain Fundamentals for Web 3.0" (2022), and "Blockchains and the Token Economy" (2022).

In recognition of contributions to the field of information systems, Mary C. Lacity was named a Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research

    Anand Jeyaraj;Joseph W Rottman;Mary C Lacity

  • An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience

    Mary C. Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • Information systems outsourcing : myths, metaphors, and realities

    Mary Celia Lacity;Rudy A. Hirschheim

  • The Value of Selective IT Sourcing

    Mary C. Lacity;L. P. Willcocks;David Feeny

  • A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice

    Mary C. Lacity;Shaji A. Khan;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage

    Mary Cecelia Lacity;Leslie Willcocks

  • A Review of the it Outsourcing Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions

    Mary C. Lacity;Shaji A. Khan;Aihua Yan;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • Understanding qualitative data: a framework of text analysis methods

    Mary C. Lacity;Marius A. Janson

  • Beyond The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon: The Insourcing Response

    Mary Cecelia Lacity;Rudy Hirschheim

  • The myths and realities of information technology insourcing

    Rudy Hirschheim;Mary Lacity

  • Taking the measure of outsourcing providers

    David Feeny;Mary Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • REALIZING OUTSOURCING EXPECTATIONS Incredible Expectations, Credible Outcomes

    Mary Lacity;Rudy Hirschheim;Leslie Willcocks

  • Interpreting information technology sourcing decisions from a transaction cost perspective: Findings and critique

    Mary C. Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential

    Leslie P. Willcocks;John Hindle;David F. Feeny;Mary C. Lacity

  • Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2

    Mary Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks;Andrew Craig

  • Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA

    Leslie P. Willcocks;Mary C. Lacity;Thomas Kern

  • Global outsourcing of back office services: lessons, trends, and enduring challenges

    Mary C. Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks;Joseph W. Rottman

  • Strategic Sourcing of Information Systems: Perspectives and Practices

    Mary C. Lacity;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • Proven Practices for Effectively Offshoring IT Work

    Joseph W. Rottman;Mary C. Lacity

  • Strategic sourcing of information systems

    Leslie P. Willcocks;Mary Lacity

Frequent Co-Authors

Leslie P. Willcocks
Leslie P. Willcocks London School of Economics and Political Science
Rudy Hirschheim
Rudy Hirschheim Louisiana State University
Erran Carmel
Erran Carmel American University
Rajiv Sabherwal
Rajiv Sabherwal University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
M. Lynne Markus
M. Lynne Markus Bentley University
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa The University of Texas at Austin
William J. Kettinger
William J. Kettinger Clemson University
Carsten Sørensen
Carsten Sørensen London School of Economics and Political Science
Allen S. Lee
Allen S. Lee Virginia Commonwealth University
E. Burton Swanson
E. Burton Swanson University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online business and management degrees in the USA can open up flexible and diverse career opportunities. Many students are concerned about balancing quality with affordability. For those focused on budget-friendly education, there are numerous affordable graduate schools offering recognized online master’s programs in business and management.

There is also a growing demand for professionals skilled in analytics and data-driven decision-making. Enrolling in top data science programs online can help you gain competitive expertise in this sector.

For those with leadership ambitions, pursuing an online phd leadership provides advanced credentials to qualify for executive positions or academic roles.

When choosing your online degree pathway, it’s important to select from reputable institutions. Consider enrolling in one of the top 10 online universities to ensure your degree is nationally accredited and widely respected by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Lacity

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles