World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jae-Nam Lee

Jae-Nam Lee

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 35 2125 1997 16 15 131 16334
Computer Science 33 12342 11983 159 159 119 16129

Jae-Nam Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jae-Nam Lee between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jae-Nam Lee published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 3 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jae-Nam Lee: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 2
2000 5
2001 4
2002 2
2003 7
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 6
2008 15
2009 6
2010 5
2011 10
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 13
2016 9
2017 8
2018 3
2019 5
2020 0
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
2025 2
Total 140
Download as CSV

Jae-Nam Lee publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Nam Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 130–134 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 131 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79 131
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jae-Nam Lee D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Nam Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124 35
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jae-Nam Lee is affiliated with Korea University in South Korea. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Subfields of study in which they have contributed include Marketing, Cultural Studies, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Management Information Systems.

Their research addresses a range of topics such as Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior, Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research, Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management, Corporate Finance and Governance, Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis, Innovation and Knowledge Management, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jae-Nam Lee include:

  • The Role of Vendor Legitimacy in IT Outsourcing Performance: Theory and Evidence (2021), published in Information Systems Research
  • Portfolio effects of knowledge management strategies on firm performance: Complementarity or substitutability? (2021), published in Information & Management
  • Government data openness and knowledge management: configurational patterns for national competitiveness (2022), published in Industrial Management & Data Systems
  • The Effect of Co-evolution of AI-Based Customized Cosmetics Preparation on Customized Cosmetic Preparation Managers and Potential Demand Values (2024), published in Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology
  • The Influence of Beauty Influencer's Characteristics on Makeup Behavior and Color Cosmetics Purchase Intentionin Young Female Consumers aged 20-30s (2021), published in Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology

Jae-Nam Lee has collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Carol Hsu, Yulin Fang, Detmar W. Straub, Ning Su, and Hyun-Sun Ryu.

Their publication venues demonstrate diversity, with multiple contributions to the Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology, as well as publications appearing in Information Systems Research, Information & Management, Industrial Management & Data Systems, and the Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology.

Best Publications

  • Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate

    Gee-Woo Bock;Robert W. Zmud;Young-Gul Kim;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation

    Jae-Nam Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success

    Jae-Nam Lee

  • IT Outsourcing Strategies: Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Explanations of Success

    Jae-Nam Lee;Shaila M. Miranda;Yong-Mi Kim

  • IT outsourcing evolution---: past, present, and future

    Jae-Nam Lee;Minh Q. Huynh;Ron Chi-Wai Kwok;Shih-Ming Pi

  • The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation

    Kee-Young Kwahk;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Using e-CRM for a unified view of the customer

    Shan L. Pan;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective

    Hyun-Soo Han;Jae-Nam Lee;Yun-Weon Seo

  • Understanding the product information inference process in electronic word-of-mouth: An objectivity-subjectivity dichotomy perspective

    Jung Lee;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance

    Hojung Shin;Jae-Nam Lee;DaeSoo Kim;Hosun Rhim

  • An integrative model of trust on IT outsourcing: Examining a bilateral perspective

    Jae-Nam Lee;Minh Q. Huynh;Rudy Hirschheim

  • Understanding the effect of knowledge management strategies on knowledge management performance: A contingency perspective

    Tae Hun Kim;Jae-Nam Lee;Jae Uk Chun;Izak Benbasat

  • Institutional Influences on Information Systems Security Innovations

    Carol Hsu;Jae-Nam Lee;Detmar W. Straub

  • Vendors' perspectives on trust and control in offshore information systems outsourcing

    Ji-Ye Mao;Jae-Nam Lee;Chun-Ping Deng

  • The evolution of outsourcing research: what is the next issue?

    Jae-Nam Lee;M.Q. Huynh;Kwok Ron Chi-wai;Shih-Ming Pi

  • The role of IT in business ecosystems

    Hyeyoung Kim;Jae-Nam Lee;Jaemin Han

  • Market perception on cloud computing initiatives in organizations: An extended resource-based view

    Insoo Son;Dongwon Lee;Jae-Nam Lee;Young Bong Chang

  • Effects of initial and ongoing trust in IT outsourcing: A bilateral perspective

    Jae-Nam Lee;Byounggu Choi

  • Understanding outsourcing partnership: a comparison of three theoretical perspectives

    Jae-Nam Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • The long tail or the short tail: The category-specific impact of eWOM on sales distribution

    Jung Lee;Jae-Nam Lee;Hojung Shin

  • The Contribution of Commitment Value in Internet Commerce: An Empirical Investigation

    Jae-Nam Lee;Shih-Ming Pi;Ron Chi-Wai Kwok;Minh Q. Huynh

Frequent Co-Authors

Young-Gul Kim
Young-Gul Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Detmar W. Straub
Detmar W. Straub Temple University
Dongwon Lee
Dongwon Lee Pennsylvania State University
Bernard C. Y. Tan
Bernard C. Y. Tan National University of Singapore
Guy G. Gable
Guy G. Gable Queensland University of Technology
Shan Ling Pan
Shan Ling Pan University of New South Wales
Peter H.R. Green
Peter H.R. Green Columbia University
Robert W. Zmud
Robert W. Zmud University of Oklahoma
Chulmo Koo
Chulmo Koo Kyung Hee University
Rudy Hirschheim
Rudy Hirschheim Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online business and management degrees opens diverse career opportunities across industries. For professionals aiming for executive roles, a doctorate in leadership can pave the way for top positions in both private and public organizations. It provides advanced skills in strategy, management, and organizational change.

Choosing the right institution is crucial, particularly when considering online education. The top online universities offer nationally accredited business and management programs recognized by employers, ensuring the quality and credibility of your degree.

Specialized pathways are also available for students interested in sectors like construction and healthcare. An accelerated construction management degree provides the expertise needed for leadership roles in a fast-growing industry. Similarly, a healthcare administration degree online accredited equips graduates with the skills to manage teams and operations in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare companies.

By selecting the right online degree and career pathway, students can tailor their education to their professional goals and achieve success in their chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Jae-Nam Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles