World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 35 2156 2027 340 308 103 8826

Dana Minbaeva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dana Minbaeva between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dana Minbaeva published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2025. 28 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2025. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 25 publications
2001 2025

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dana Minbaeva: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 3
2012 6
2013 9
2014 10
2015 6
2016 7
2017 5
2018 9
2019 8
2020 5
2021 9
2022 8
2023 3
2024 3
2025 25
Total 139
Download as CSV

Dana Minbaeva publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Minbaeva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 100–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 103 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104 103
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Dana Minbaeva D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Minbaeva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124 35
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Dana Minbaeva is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains within business, management, and social sciences, with a particular focus on organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, and communication.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics, including:

  • International Business and FDI
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • AI and HR Technologies
  • Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Employer Branding and e-HRM

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dana Minbaeva include:

  • Christian Geisler Asmussen
  • Niron Hashai
  • Maral Muratbekova-Touron
  • Sven Horak

Their publications appear prominently in venues such as:

  • Journal of International Business Studies
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Organizational Dynamics
  • Human Resource Management Review

Recent papers by Dana Minbaeva include:

  • "International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice" (2020) published in the Journal of International Business Studies
  • "Disrupted HR?" (2020) published in Human Resource Management Review
  • "Explaining the Persistence of Informal Institutions: The Role of Informal Networks" (2022) published in Academy of Management Review
  • "Beyond the double-edged sword of cultural diversity in teams: Progress, critique, and next steps" (2021) published in Journal of International Business Studies
  • "Strategic human resource management in the context of environmental crises: A COVID-19 test" (2023) published in Human Resource Management

Dana Minbaeva's scholarly contributions include book publications as well. They have authored a work with Edward Elgar Publishing titled "Encyclopedia of International Strategic Management" (2024).

Best Publications

  • MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM

    Dana Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen;Ingmar Björkman;Carl F Fey

  • International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice.

    Paula Caligiuri;Helen De Cieri;Dana Minbaeva;Alain Verbeke;Alain Verbeke;Alain Verbeke

  • Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters

    Nicolai Juul Foss;Dana Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen;Mia Reinholt

  • Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • HRM practices and MNC knowledge transfer

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations: The role of disseminative capacity

    Dana B. Minbaeva;Snejina Michailova

  • Governance Mechanisms for the Promotion of Social Capital for Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations

    Paul Gooderham;Dana B. Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen

  • Building credible human capital analytics for organizational competitive advantage

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • SEVEN MYTHS OF GLOBAL TALENT MANAGEMENT

    Dana Minbaeva;David G. Collings

  • Linking HRM and knowledge transfer via individual‐level mechanisms

    Dana B. Minbaeva;Kristiina Mäkelä;Kristiina Mäkelä;Larissa Rabbiosi

  • HRM practices affecting extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of knowledge receivers and their effect on intra-MNC knowledge transfer

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • Organizational values and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations: The Danisco case

    Snejina Michailova;Dana B. Minbaeva

  • Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • Knowledge‐sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: an empirical test

    Kenneth Husted;Snejina Michailova;Dana B. Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen

  • A retrospective on: MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM

    Dana B Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen;Torben Pedersen;Ingmar Björkman;Carl F Fey

  • Bringing the knowledge perspective into HRM

    Dana Minbaeva;Nicolai Juul Foss;Scott Snell

  • Disrupted HR

    Dana Minbaeva

  • Global Standardization or National Differentiation of HRM Practices in Multinational Companies?: A Comparison of Multinationals in Five Countries

    Tony Edwards;Rocío Sánchez-Mangas;Patrice Jalette;Jonathan Lavelle

  • Crossing times: Temporal boundary-spanning practices in interorganizational projects

    Iben Sandal Stjerne;Jonas Söderlund;Dana Minbaeva

  • MNC Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity and HRM

    Dana Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen;Ingmar Bjoerkman;Carl F. Fey

  • Negative Impact of Hrm Complementarity on Knowledge Transfer in Mncs

    Dana B. Minbaeva

  • MNC KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER, SUBSIDIARY ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND HRM.

    Dana Minbaeva;Torben Pedersen;Ingmar Björkman;Carl F. Fey

  • Global Standardization or National Differentiation of HRM Practices in Multinational Companies?: A Comparison of Multinationals in Five Countries

    Tony Edwards;Jonathan Lavelle;Dana Minbaeva;Rocio Sanchez-Mangas

Frequent Co-Authors

Torben Pedersen
Torben Pedersen Copenhagen Business School
Ilan Vertinsky
Ilan Vertinsky University of British Columbia
Snejina Michailova
Snejina Michailova University of Auckland
Alain Verbeke
Alain Verbeke University of Calgary
Ingmar Björkman
Ingmar Björkman Hanken School of Economics
Carl F. Fey
Carl F. Fey BI Norwegian Business School
Helen De Cieri
Helen De Cieri Monash University
Nicolai Juul Foss
Nicolai Juul Foss Copenhagen Business School
Tony Edwards
Tony Edwards Loughborough University
Günter K. Stahl
Günter K. Stahl Vienna University of Economics and Business

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Business and Management opens doors to a variety of career paths. Popular specializations include accounting, artificial intelligence, and healthcare administration, each offering unique opportunities and challenges.

A health care administration degree online can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare institutions. If you’re aiming for senior positions, a healthcare administration degree at the master’s level delivers advanced skills for strategic decision-making in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in finance, an online accounting degree cost is a critical consideration. These accredited programs are designed to train future accountants, auditors, and financial managers—career options always in high demand.

Technology is transforming business, making an online artificial intelligence degree a smart, future-focused choice. This path leads to roles in data science, machine learning, and process automation.

With flexible study options and growing employer recognition, online degrees provide practical pathways to thriving business and management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Dana Minbaeva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles