World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4474
World Ranking
8859
National Ranking
3749

Brenda E. Porter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda E. Porter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 82 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brenda E. Porter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda E. Porter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenda E. Porter is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, including significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist has published extensively in the subfields of psychiatry and mental health, physiology, molecular biology, genetics, and oncology. Their work covers several topics, notably epilepsy research and treatment, tuberous sclerosis complex research, amino acid enzymes and metabolism, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, genomics and rare diseases, as well as polyomavirus and related diseases, and pharmacological effects and toxicity studies.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Brenda E. Porter include:

  • Somatic variants in diverse genes leads to a spectrum of focal cortical malformations (2022) published in Brain
  • Real-World Preliminary Experience With Responsive Neurostimulation in Pediatric Epilepsy: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study (2021) published in Neurosurgery
  • Early Treatment with Vigabatrin Does Not Decrease Focal Seizures or Improve Cognition in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: The PREVeNT Trial (2023) published in Annals of Neurology
  • Clinical Features, Neuropathology, and Surgical Outcome in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy and Brain Somatic Variants in the SLC35A2 Gene (2022) published in Neurology
  • Pilot Study of Neurodevelopmental Impact of Early Epilepsy Surgery in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (2020) published in Pediatric Neurology

Frequent coauthors in Brenda E. Porter's research include Gerald A. Grant, Jurriaan M. Peters, Darcy A. Krueger, Mustafa Şahin, and Sarah O'Kelley. Collaboration with these researchers is reflected in numerous joint publications.

The most common venues for Brenda E. Porter's publications are Neurology, Pediatric Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, Neurosurgery, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Report of a parent survey of cannabidiol-enriched cannabis use in pediatric treatment-resistant epilepsy.

    Brenda E. Porter;Catherine Jacobson

  • Primary sequence of a motor neuron-selective adhesive site in the synaptic basal lamina protein S-laminin

    Date D. Hunter;Brenda E. Porter;Joseph W. Bulock;Steven P. Adams

  • KCNQ2 encephalopathy: Features, mutational hot spots, and ezogabine treatment of 11 patients.

    John J. Millichap;Kristen L. Park;Tammy Tsuchida;Bruria Ben-Zeev

  • A motoneuron-selective stop signal in the synaptic protein S-laminin

    Brenda E Porter;Joachim Weis;Joshua R Sanes

  • The perineuronal net component of the extracellular matrix in plasticity and epilepsy

    Paulette A. McRae;Brenda E. Porter;Brenda E. Porter

  • Clinical spectrum and genotype–phenotype associations of KCNA2-related encephalopathies

    Silvia Masnada;Ulrike B S Hedrich;Elena Gardella;Julian Schubert

  • Somatic SLC35A2 variants in the brain are associated with intractable neocortical epilepsy.

    Melodie R. Winawer;Nicole G. Griffin;Jorge Samanamud;Evan H. Baugh

  • MEF2C Haploinsufficiency features consistent hyperkinesis, variable epilepsy, and has a role in dorsal and ventral neuronal developmental pathways

    Alex R. Paciorkowski;Ryan N. Traylor;Jill A. Rosenfeld;Jacqueline M. Hoover

  • Changes in microRNA expression in the whole hippocampus and hippocampal synaptoneurosome fraction following pilocarpine induced status epilepticus.

    Rashmi M. Risbud;Brenda E. Porter;Brenda E. Porter

  • Interictal EEG spikes identify the region of electrographic seizure onset in some, but not all, pediatric epilepsy patients.

    Eric D. Marsh;Bradley Peltzer;Merritt W. Brown;Courtney Wusthoff

  • Perineuronal net degradation in epilepsy.

    Elyse K. Rankin-Gee;Paulette A. McRae;Esther Baranov;Stephanie Rogers

  • Seizures and antiepileptic drugs: does exposure alter normal brain development?

    Eric D. Marsh;Amy R. Brooks-Kayal;Amy R. Brooks-Kayal;Brenda E. Porter;Brenda E. Porter

  • Decreased CREB levels suppress epilepsy

    Xinjian Zhu;Xiao Han;Julie A. Blendy;Brenda E. Porter;Brenda E. Porter

  • Persistent decrease in multiple components of the perineuronal net following status epilepticus

    Paulette A. McRae;Esther Baranov;Stephanie L. Rogers;Brenda E. Porter;Brenda E. Porter

  • Mutations in the Na(+)/citrate cotransporter NaCT (SLC13A5) in pediatric patients with epilepsy and developmental delay.

    Jenna Klotz;Brenda E Porter;Claire Colas;Avner Schlessinger

  • Distinct structures and functions of related pre- and postsynaptic carbohydrates at the mammalian neuromuscular junction.

    Paul T. Martin;Leland J.C. Scott;Brenda E. Porter;Joshua R. Sanes

  • Dysplasia: A common finding in intractable pediatric temporal lobe epilepsy

    B. E. Porter;A. R. Judkins;R. R. Clancy;A. Duhaime

  • Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma (SEGA) Treatment Update.

    Cynthia J. Campen;Brenda E. Porter

  • Fate of Newborn Dentate Granule Cells after Early Life Status Epilepticus

    Brenda E. Porter;Margaret Maronski;Amy R. Brooks-Kayal

  • Aggrecan expression, a component of the inhibitory interneuron perineuronal net, is altered following an early-life seizure.

    Paulette A. McRae;Esther Baranov;Shilpa Sarode;Amy R. Brooks-Kayal

  • Increased GABAA‐Receptor α1‐Subunit Expression in Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus after Early‐life Status Epilepticus

    YogendraSinh H. Raol;Guojun Zhang;Ingrid V. Lund;Brenda E. Porter

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric D. Marsh
Eric D. Marsh Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Amy R. Brooks-Kayal
Amy R. Brooks-Kayal University of Colorado Denver
Joshua R. Sanes
Joshua R. Sanes Harvard University
Michael B. Robinson
Michael B. Robinson Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jeffrey A. Golden
Jeffrey A. Golden Brigham and Women's Hospital
Daniela Kaufer
Daniela Kaufer University of California, Berkeley
William B. Dobyns
William B. Dobyns University of Minnesota
Brian Litt
Brian Litt University of Pennsylvania
Casey H. Halpern
Casey H. Halpern University of Pennsylvania
Robert R. Clancy
Robert R. Clancy New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying neuroscience, there are many related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Programs in psychology, social work, and marriage and family therapy can complement neuroscience studies and open up diverse career opportunities in research, clinical work, and counseling.

Students seeking flexible and budget-friendly options might explore cheap online psychology degree programs, which are ideal for building foundational knowledge in behavioral sciences. For those aiming for advanced study, an affordable online psychology masters can provide deeper insights into human behavior and mental health, leading to expanded roles in research or practice.

Aspiring therapists may consider enrolling in the best online mft programs to focus on family dynamics and relationship therapy. Alternatively, those drawn to social work can look into msw programs with high acceptance rate to make a difference in various community and healthcare settings.

Exploring these related online degree options can enhance your neuroscience education and support a rewarding, multidisciplinary career.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda E. Porter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles