World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
27161
World Ranking
1897
National Ranking
909

Daniela Kaufer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Kaufer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 234 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniela Kaufer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Kaufer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniela Kaufer is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a focus on Neurology, Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Developmental Neuroscience.

Their work covers a range of topics including Tryptophan and brain disorders, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Barrier Structure and Function Studies, Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms.

Frequent publication venues for Kaufer include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), International Journal of Molecular Sciences, eLife, Alzheimer's & Dementia, and Biological Psychiatry.

Some recent publications by Daniela Kaufer include:

  • Critical period regulation across multiple timescales, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Slow blood-to-brain transport underlies enduring barrier dysfunction in American football players, 2020, Brain
  • Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Astrocyte Senescence as Reciprocal Drivers of Neuropathology in Aging, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Neural correlates of ingroup bias for prosociality in rats, 2021, eLife
  • Regional gray matter oligodendrocyte- and myelin-related measures are associated with differential susceptibility to stress-induced behavior in rats and humans, 2021, Translational Psychiatry

Kaufer has collaborated frequently with several researchers across multiple studies. Notable co-authors include Kimberly L. P. Long, Jocelyn Breton, Yanabah Jaques, Alon Friedman, and Matthew Barraza.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association.

    Donald R. Royall;Edward C. Lauterbach;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Allison Reeve

  • VEGF is necessary for exercise‐induced adult hippocampal neurogenesis

    Klaus Fabel;Konstanze Fabel;Betty Tam;Daniela Kaufer

  • Blood–brain barrier breakdown as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury

    Dan Shlosberg;Mony Benifla;Daniela Kaufer;Alon Friedman

  • Acute stress facilitates long-lasting changes in cholinergic gene expression

    Daniela Kaufer;Alon Friedman;Alon Friedman;Shlomo Seidman;Hermona Soreq

  • Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

    Elisabeth H. Thijssen;Elisabeth H. Thijssen;Renaud La Joie;Amy Wolf;Amelia Strom

  • Assessing the impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale.

    Daniel I. Kaufer;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Dianne Christine;Tim Bray

  • Cortical cholinergic function is more severely affected in parkinsonian dementia than in Alzheimer disease: an in vivo positron emission tomographic study.

    Nicolaas I. Bohnen;Daniel I. Kaufer;Larry S. Ivanco;Brian Lopresti

  • TGF-β receptor-mediated albumin uptake into astrocytes is involved in neocortical epileptogenesis

    Sebastian Ivens;Daniela Kaufer;Daniela Kaufer;Luisa P Flores;Ingo Bechmann

  • Critical period regulation across multiple timescales.

    Rebecca K. Reh;Brian G. Dias;Brian G. Dias;Charles A. Nelson;Daniela Kaufer

  • Pyridostigmine brain penetration under stress enhances neuronal excitability and induces early immediate transcriptional response.

    Alon Friedman;Alon Friedman;Daniela Kaufer;Joshua Shemer;Joshua Shemer;Israel Hendler;Israel Hendler

  • Stress increases putative gonadotropin inhibitory hormone and decreases luteinizing hormone in male rats

    Elizabeth D. Kirby;Anna C. Geraghty;Takayoshi Ubuka;George E. Bentley

  • Transcriptome Profiling Reveals TGF-β Signaling Involvement in Epileptogenesis

    Luisa P Cacheaux;Sebastian Ivens;Yaron David;Alexander J Lakhter

  • Executive Control Function

    Donald R. Royall;Edward C. Lauterbach;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Allison Reeve

  • Stress, social behavior, and resilience: insights from rodents.

    Annaliese K. Beery;Daniela Kaufer

  • Concussion, microvascular injury, and early tauopathy in young athletes after impact head injury and an impact concussion mouse model.

    Chad A. Tagge;Andrew M. Fisher;Olga V. Minaeva;Amanda Gaudreau-Balderrama

  • Neuropsychiatric aspects of Alzheimer's disease: The cholinergic hypothesis revisited

    Jeffrey L. Cummings;Daniel Kaufer

  • Astrocytic Dysfunction in Epileptogenesis: Consequence of Altered Potassium and Glutamate Homeostasis?

    Yaron David;Luisa P Cacheaux;Sebastian Ivens;Ezequiel Lapilover

  • Psychiatric symptoms vary with the severity of dementia in probable Alzheimer's disease.

    Oscar L. Lopez;James T. Becker;Robert A. Sweet;William Klunk

  • Blood-brain barrier breakdown-inducing astrocytic transformation: novel targets for the prevention of epilepsy.

    Alon Friedman;Alon Friedman;Daniela Kaufer;Uwe Heinemann

  • The cognitive correlates of functional status

    Donald R Royall;Edward C. Lauterbach;Daniel Kaufer;Paul Malloy

Frequent Co-Authors

Alon Friedman
Alon Friedman Dalhousie University
Hermona Soreq
Hermona Soreq Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Uwe Heinemann
Uwe Heinemann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
George E. Bentley
George E. Bentley University of California, Berkeley
Ann C. McKee
Ann C. McKee Boston University
Robert M. Sapolsky
Robert M. Sapolsky Stanford University
Lance J. Kriegsfeld
Lance J. Kriegsfeld University of California, Berkeley
Gareth R. Howell
Gareth R. Howell The Jackson Laboratory
Bruce T. Lamb
Bruce T. Lamb Indiana University
Dacher Keltner
Dacher Keltner University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniela Kaufer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles