World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 35 9028 8692 100 99 173 4474

Hamidreza M. Nick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hamidreza M. Nick between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hamidreza M. Nick published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2019. 23 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2019. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hamidreza M. Nick: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 3
2014 4
2015 4
2016 9
2017 9
2018 17
2019 40
2020 25
2021 30
2022 28
2023 36
2024 28
2025 22
2026 1
Total 264
Download as CSV

Hamidreza M. Nick publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamidreza M. Nick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 173 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407 173
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Hamidreza M. Nick D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamidreza M. Nick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262 35
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Hamidreza M. Nick is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark. Their research contributions primarily span the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with a pronounced focus on Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Environmental Engineering, and Geophysics.

The scientist's scholarly work encompasses several main topics:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Groundwater Flow and Contamination Studies
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Hamidreza M. Nick has published extensively in several key venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • Advances in Water Resources
  • Energy & Fuels
  • Journal of Hydrology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Frédéric Amour, Mohammad Reza Hajiabadi, Seyedbehzad Hosseinzadehsadati, Teeratorn Kadeethum, and Ali Akbar Eftekhari.

Representative recent papers authored by Hamidreza M. Nick involve diverse aspects of energy and environmental engineering:

  • Feasibility of hydrogen storage in depleted hydrocarbon chalk reservoirs: Assessment of biochemical and chemical effects, 2022, Applied Energy
  • Physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear diffusivity and Biot's equations, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Challenges and enablers for large-scale CO2 storage in chalk formations, 2021, Earth-Science Reviews
  • In situ hydrogen generation from underground fossil hydrocarbons, 2025, Joule
  • Nitrite is a more efficient inhibitor of microbial sulfate reduction in oil reservoirs compared to nitrate and perchlorate: A laboratory and field-scale simulation study, 2020, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation

The topics of these papers reflect their engagement with cutting-edge technological and scientific challenges related to hydrogen storage, CO2 sequestration, microbial processes in oil reservoirs, and computational methods in solving complex physical equations.

Best Publications

  • Modelling stress-dependent permeability in fractured rock including effects of propagating and bending fractures

    John-Paul Latham;Jiansheng Xiang;Mandefro Belayneh;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • A three-dimensional coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model for deformable fractured geothermal systems

    Saeed Salimzadeh;Adriana Paluszny;Hamidreza M. Nick;Robert W. Zimmerman

  • PoreFlow: A complex pore-network model for simulation of reactive transport in variably saturated porous media

    A. Raoof;H. M. Nick;H. M. Nick;S. M. Hassanizadeh;C. J. Spiers

  • Feasibility of hydrogen storage in depleted hydrocarbon chalk reservoirs: Assessment of biochemical and chemical effects

    Unknown

  • Pore-scale modeling of reactive transport in wellbore cement under CO2 storage conditions

    A. Raoof;H.M. Nick;T.K.T. Wolterbeek;C.J. Spiers

  • The impact of different aperture distribution models and critical stress criteria on equivalent permeability in fractured rocks

    Kevin Bisdom;Giovanni Bertotti;Hamidreza M. Nick;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • An integrated workflow for stress and flow modelling using outcrop-derived discrete fracture networks

    K. Bisdom;H.M. Nick;G. Bertotti

  • Comparison of Three FE-FV Numerical Schemes for Single- and Two-Phase Flow Simulation of Fractured Porous Media

    Hamidreza M. Nick;Hamidreza M. Nick;Stephan Matthäi

  • Physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear diffusivity and Biot's equations.

    Teeratorn Kadeethum;Thomas M. Jørgensen;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • Heat Recovery from Multiple-Fracture Enhanced Geothermal Systems: The Effect of Thermoelastic Fracture Interactions

    Hedda Slatlem Vik;Saeed Salimzadeh;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • The influence of facies heterogeneity on the doublet performance in low-enthalpy geothermal sedimentary reservoirs

    R.A. Crooijmans;C.J.L. Willems;Hamidreza M. Maghami Nick;D.F. Bruhn

  • Multiscale fracture network characterization and impact on flow: A case study on the Latemar carbonate platform

    Nico J. Hardebol;Christine Maier;Hamid Nick;Sebastian Geiger

  • An overview of the oil-brine interfacial behavior and a new surface complexation model

    María Bonto;Ali A. Eftekhari;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • Simulation of Solute Transport Through Fractured Rock: A Higher-Order Accurate Finite-Element Finite-Volume Method Permitting Large Time Steps

    Stephan K. Matthäi;Hamidreza M. Nick;Christopher Pain;Insa Neuweiler

  • An evaluation of interferences in heat production from low enthalpy geothermal doublets systems

    Cees J. L. Willems;Hamidreza M. Nick;Gert Jan Weltje;David F. Bruhn

  • Challenges and enablers for large-scale CO2 storage in chalk formations

    M. Bonto;M.J. Welch;M. Lüthje;S.I. Andersen

  • Role of geomechanically grown fractures on dispersive transport in heterogeneous geological formations

    Hamidreza M. Nick;Adriana Paluszny;Martin J. Blunt;Stephan Matthäi

  • A prototype design model for deep low-enthalpy hydrothermal systems

    Sanaz Saeid;Rafid Al-Khoury;Hamidreza M. Nick;Michael A. Hicks

  • Thermoporoelastic effects during heat extraction from low-permeability reservoirs

    Saeed Salimzadeh;Saeed Salimzadeh;Hamidreza M. Nick;R.W. Zimmerman

  • Upscaling two-phase flow in naturally fractured reservoirs

    Stephan K. Matthäi;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • Performance of low-enthalpy geothermal systems: Interplay of spatially correlated heterogeneity and well-doublet spacings

    Masoud Babaei;Hamidreza M. Nick;Hamidreza M. Nick

  • Reactive dispersive contaminant transport in coastal aquifers: Numerical simulation of a reactive Henry problem

    H.M. Nick;A. Raoof;F. Centler;M. Thullner;M. Thullner

  • The impact of in-situ stress and outcrop-based fracture geometry on hydraulic aperture and upscaled permeability in fractured reservoirs

    Kevin Bisdom;Giovanni Bertotti;Hamidreza M. Nick

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali Eftekhari
Ali Eftekhari Technical University of Denmark
Stephan K. Matthäi
Stephan K. Matthäi University of Melbourne
Giovanni Bertotti
Giovanni Bertotti Delft University of Technology
Pierre Regnier
Pierre Regnier Université Libre de Bruxelles
Robert W. Zimmerman
Robert W. Zimmerman Imperial College London
Christopher J. Spiers
Christopher J. Spiers Utrecht University
Martin J. Blunt
Martin J. Blunt Imperial College London
Erling Halfdan Stenby
Erling Halfdan Stenby Technical University of Denmark
Martin Thullner
Martin Thullner Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Adriana Paluszny
Adriana Paluszny Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse career options. Many students further their studies online for greater flexibility and affordability. For those interested in enhancing communication skills, consider pursuing an online masters in communication. This degree can help bridge gaps between technical and non-technical teams, a crucial skill in today’s tech-driven workplace.

Aspiring innovators can benefit from business-focused programs. An mba for entrepreneurs provides a foundation in launching and managing tech startups. If you're looking for flexibility with admissions, an mba online no gmat offers a pathway for professionals who want to advance without standardized test requirements.

Additionally, leadership roles in engineering projects often require specific management expertise. An online degree in project management equips students with skills to efficiently oversee tech projects—preparing you for high-demand roles across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Hamidreza M. Nick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles