World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
5094
World Ranking
9430
National Ranking
442

Ray Kostaschuk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Kostaschuk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Ray Kostaschuk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Kostaschuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray Kostaschuk is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Engineering. Their scholarly work focuses on various aspects of Earth-surface processes, hydrology, sediment transport, and related engineering concerns.

Their research topics include:

  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Tailings Management and Properties
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Kostaschuk has published in a number of peer-reviewed venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Geology
  • Sedimentology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Kostaschuk include:

  • The Influence of Slipface Angle on Fluvial Dune Growth, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Erosion, deposition and contamination by high-magnitude subaqueous debris flows and turbidity currents: Insights from the failure of a tailings dam near Quesnel Lake, British Columbia, 2020, Sedimentology
  • Why do large, deep rivers have low-angle dune beds?: REPLY, 2020, Geology
  • Dune Geometry and the Associated Hydraulic Roughness in the Fluvial to Tidal Transition Zone of the Fraser River at Low River Flow, 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • ERRATUM: Why do large, deep rivers have low-angle dune beds?, 2020, Geology

Kostaschuk frequently collaborates with other researchers including Jeremy G. Venditti, R. W. Bradley, A.J.F. Hoitink, Suleyman Naqshband, and David Hurther, with multiple coauthored publications highlighting ongoing partnerships.

Their subfields of study focus on:

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Ecology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Soil Science

Best Publications

  • Resuspension of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in a natural stream.

    Rob C. Jamieson;Douglas M. Joy;H. Lee;R. Kostaschuk

  • Morphology and flow fields of three-dimensional dunes, Rio Paraná, Argentina: Results from simultaneous multibeam echo sounding and acoustic Doppler current profiling

    Daniel R. Parsons;James L. Best;Oscar Orfeo;Richard J. Hardy

  • FLOW AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OVER LARGE SUBAQUEOUS DUNES : FRASER RIVER, CANADA

    Ray Kostaschuk;Paul Villard

  • Transport and deposition of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in natural streams.

    Rob Jamieson;Doug M. Joy;Hung Lee;Ray Kostaschuk

  • An experimental study of turbulent flow over a low-angle dune

    Jim Best;Ray Kostaschuk

  • Measuring flow velocity and sediment transport with an acoustic Doppler current profiler

    Ray Kostaschuk;James Leonard Best;Paul Villard;Jeff Peakall

  • Depositional process and alluvial fan-drainage basin morphometric relationships near banff, Alberta, Canada

    R. A. Kostaschuk;G. M. Macdonald;P. E. Putnam

  • Form roughness and the absence of secondary flow in a large confluence–diffluence, Rio Paraná, Argentina

    Daniel R. Parsons;James Leonard Best;Stuart N. Lane;Oscar Orfeo

  • Identification of debris flow hazard on alluvial fans in the Canadian Rocky Mountains

    Lionel E. Jackson;R. A. Kostaschuk;G. M. MacDonald

  • Causes of rapid mixing at a junction of two large rivers: Río Paraná and Río Paraguay, Argentina

    Stuart N. Lane;Daniel R. Parsons;James L. Best;Oscar Orfeo

  • Macroturbulence generated by dunes: Fraser River, Canada

    R.A. Kostaschuk;M.A. Church

  • Whole flow field dynamics and velocity pulsing within natural sediment-laden underflows

    James L. Best;Ray A. Kostaschuk;Jeffrey Peakall;Paul V. Villard

  • A field study of turbulence and sediment dynamics over subaqueous dunes with flow separation

    Ray Kostaschuk

  • Measuring velocity and shear stress over dunes with acoustic Doppler profiler

    Ray Kostaschuk;Paul Villard;James Leonard Best

  • Bedforms, bed material, and bedload transport in a salt-wedge estuary: Fraser River, British Columbia

    R. A. Kostaschuk;M. A. Church;J. L. Luternauer

  • Initiation and evolution of gullies along the shoreline of Lake Huron

    M.B. Burkard;R.A. Kostaschuk

  • Patterns and controls of gully growth along the shoreline of Lake Huron

    M. B. Burkard;R. A. Kostaschuk

  • On the relationship between flow and suspended sediment transport over the crest of a sand dune, Río Paraná, Argentina

    Dan H. Shugar;Ray Kostaschuk;James L. Best;Daniel R. Parsons

  • Rates of floodplain accretion in a tropical island river system impacted by cyclones and large floods

    James P Terry;Sitaram Garimella;Ray A Kostaschuk

  • Persistence of enteric bacteria in alluvial streams

    R C Jamieson;D M Joy;H Lee;R Kostaschuk

Frequent Co-Authors

James Leonard Best
James Leonard Best University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Daniel R. Parsons
Daniel R. Parsons University of Hull
Stuart N. Lane
Stuart N. Lane University of Lausanne
Jeremy G. Venditti
Jeremy G. Venditti Simon Fraser University
Zhongyuan Chen
Zhongyuan Chen East China Normal University
Jeff Peakall
Jeff Peakall University of Leeds
Michael Church
Michael Church University of British Columbia
Mead A. Allison
Mead A. Allison Tulane University
Robert Gordon
Robert Gordon Wilfrid Laurier University
Hung Lee
Hung Lee University of Guelph

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Environmental Sciences degree opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields to broaden their expertise. For example, public administration roles focused on environmental policy and management can benefit from programs like the easiest online mpa programs, which offer flexibility and accelerated study options.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in environmental work, making online degrees such as those listed in online sociology bachelor programs a valuable complement for students interested in community-focused initiatives and research.

For professionals aiming to enhance their academic credentials without the traditional research barrier, options like earning a doctorate degree online no dissertation offer more accessible avenues into doctoral-level education, useful in policy development and leadership roles.

Additionally, advancing through education degrees remains a popular pathway, especially with schools offering some of the best online eds to edd programs. These can prepare graduates for impactful positions in environmental education and advocacy. Exploring these related degrees can enrich careers and expand professional opportunities in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Kostaschuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles