World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 39 1697 12 93 26341

Young-Gul Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Young-Gul Kim between 1974 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Young-Gul Kim published across 50 years, from 1974 to 2023, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1993. 3 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1993. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
1974 2023

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Young-Gul Kim: publications per year, 1974 to 2023
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 0
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 4
1993 10
1994 8
1995 6
1996 3
1997 5
1998 8
1999 5
2000 4
2001 9
2002 6
2003 8
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 3
2012 1
2013 1
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 2
Total 153
Download as CSV

Young-Gul Kim publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Young-Gul Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 90–94 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 93 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111 93
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Young-Gul Kim D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Young-Gul Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89 39
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Young-Gul Kim is affiliated with the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology in South Korea. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and decision sciences, with a particular focus on subfields such as sociology and political science, information systems and management, management information systems, economics and econometrics, as well as management science and operations research.

The research topics covered by Young-Gul Kim center on digital marketing and social media, technology adoption and user behaviour, fintech including crowdfunding and digital finance, microfinance and financial inclusion, innovation diffusion and forecasting, behavioral health and interventions, and consumer perception and purchasing behavior.

Their recent scholarly publications include:

  • "Reward versus Altruistic Motivations in Reward-Based Crowdfunding," 2020, International Journal of Electronic Commerce
  • "Effect of media context on avoidance of skippable pre-roll ads in online video platform: A mental accounting of time perspective," 2023, Journal of Business Research
  • "Free to Premium in Mobile TV Service: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Factors Affecting Free Users' Paid Subscription Intention," 2023, Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems
  • "Effect of Media Context on Ad Avoidance in Online Video Platform: A Mental Accounting of Time Perspective," 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

These publications reflect investigations into consumer motivations in crowdfunding, media context effects on advertising avoidance behavior, and motivational factors influencing subscription intentions for mobile TV services.

Young-Gul Kim has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Sunghan Ryu, Hyungjin Lukas Kim, Sang-Hyeak Yoon, Joo-Young Park, and Keongtae Kim. The most frequent collaborations are with Sunghan Ryu, followed by Hyungjin Lukas Kim and Sang-Hyeak Yoon.

Their work has appeared in multiple academic venues, demonstrating a multidisciplinary approach. These venues include:

  • International Journal of Electronic Commerce
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate

    Gee-Woo Bock;Robert W. Zmud;Young-Gul Kim;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context

    Ji-Won Moon;Young-Gul Kim

  • Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing

    Gee W. Bock;Young-Gul Kim

  • The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective

    Kyung-Kwon Hong;Young-Gul Kim

  • Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation

    Jae-Nam Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context

    Chung‐Hoon Park;Young‐Gul Kim

  • The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees' tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions

    Yong Sauk Hau;Byoungsoo Kim;Heeseok Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • Encouraging participation in virtual communities

    Joon Koh;Young-Gul Kim;Brian Butler;Gee-Woo Bock

  • Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective

    Joon Koh;Young-Gul Kim

  • Sense of Virtual Community: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation

    Unknown

  • An integrative model for knowledge sharing in communities‐of‐practice

    Su Hwan Jeon;Young-Gul Kim;Joon Koh

  • A CRM performance measurement framework: Its development process and application

    Hyung-Su Kim;Young-Gul Kim

  • A framework of dynamic CRM: linking marketing with information strategy

    Ch Park Chung-Hoon Park;Yg Kim Young-Gul Kim

  • A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis

    Jang-Hwan Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • Why would online gamers share their innovation-conducive knowledge in the online game user community? Integrating individual motivations and social capital perspectives

    Yong Sauk Hau;Young-Gul Kim

  • Comparing data modeling formalisms

    Young-Gul Kim;Salvatore T. March

  • Effects of Managerial Drivers and Climate Maturity on Knowledge-Management Performance: Empirical Validation

    Jang-Hwan Lee;Young-Gul Kim;Min-Yong Kim

  • Knowledge strategy planning: methodology and case

    Young-Gul Kim;Sung-Ho Yu;Jang-Hwan Lee

  • A typology of crowdfunding sponsors

    Sunghan Ryu;Young-Gul Kim

  • Determinants of corporate adoption of e-Marketplace: an innovation theory perspective

    Young-Beum Joo;Young-Gul Kim

  • The Effect of Information Satisfaction and Relational Benefit on Consumers' Online Shopping Site Commitments

    Chung-Hoon Park;Young-Gul Kim

  • Understanding outsourcing partnership: a comparison of three theoretical perspectives

    Jae-Nam Lee;Young-Gul Kim

  • Supporting business process redesign using cognitive maps

    Kee-Young Kwahk;Young-Gul Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Jae-Nam Lee
Jae-Nam Lee Korea University
Ingoo Han
Ingoo Han Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Hee-Woong Kim
Hee-Woong Kim Yonsei University
Robert W. Zmud
Robert W. Zmud University of Oklahoma
Brian S. Butler
Brian S. Butler University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and specialized career pathways. For those interested in the built environment, pursuing a construction management degree online provides leadership skills for project management and site supervision roles within the construction industry.

For experienced professionals aiming to advance in leadership, affordable online executive mba programs offer an excellent opportunity to develop strategic decision-making and executive skills without disrupting current careers.

Graduate-level study doesn’t have to break the bank. Numerous universities now offer least expensive online masters programs, covering a variety of disciplines connected to business and management.

Finally, data-driven roles are in high demand. An online masters in data science programs delivers the analytical and technical skills needed for careers that blend business insight with advanced data analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Young-Gul Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles