World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
62
Citations
41487
World Ranking
455
National Ranking
207

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
41096
World Ranking
3151
National Ranking
1526

Robert W. Zmud publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Zmud sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 150 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Robert W. Zmud D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Zmud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - AIS LEO Award, Association for Information Systems
  • 2003 - Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS)
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Overview

Robert W. Zmud is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of Engineering, with a focus on Electrical and Electronic Engineering as well as Mechanical Engineering.

The following topics represent the main areas of Zmud's research work:

  • Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
  • Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
  • Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

Zmud has published research in venues including:

  • Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining

One recent paper authored by Zmud is titled A Practical Approach to Interpretation and Consideration of Tool Tolerance for In-Situ Strength Testing, published in 2024 in the venue Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining.

Zmud frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include:

  • Benjamin Mittelstadt
  • Matthew Nicholson
  • Terry Delong
  • Brian Jiménez-García

The scientist has been recognized with several awards including:

  • AIS LEO Award, Association for Information Systems (2008)
  • Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) (2003)
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

This profile summarizes Zmud's standing as an active contributor to engineering research, with a particular emphasis on topics related to semiconductor technology and testing methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate

    Gee-Woo Bock;Robert W. Zmud;Young-Gul Kim;Jae-Nam Lee

  • Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach

    Randolph B. Cooper;Robert W. Zmud

  • Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation

    T. H. Kwon;R. W. Zmud

  • The identity crisis within the is discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties

    Izak Benbasat;Robert W. Zmud

  • A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems

    Jon (Sean) Jasperson;Pamela E. Carter;Robert W. Zmud

  • Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions

    John R. Carlson;Robert W. Zmud

  • Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance

    Izak Benbasat;Robert W. Zmud

  • Arrangements for information technology governance: a theory of multiple contingencies

    V. Sambamurthy;Robert W. Zmud

  • INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE*

    Robert W. Zmud

  • The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations

    Andrew C. Boynton;Robert W. Zmud;Gerry C. Jacobs

  • Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization

    Robert W. Zmud

  • The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation

    Russell L. Purvis;V. Sambamurthy;Robert W. Zmud

  • An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work

    Robert W. Zmud

  • The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion

    V. L. Saga;R. W. Zmud

  • AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION

    Robert W. Zmud

  • Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era--A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research

    V. Sambamurthy;Robert W. Zmud

  • Information technology planning in the 1990's: directions for practice and research

    Andrew C. Boynton;Robert W. Zmud

  • Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: strategies and illustrative examples

    Brenda Massetti;Robert W. Zmud

  • The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms

    Bruce Dehning;Vernon J. Richardson;Robert W. Zmud

  • A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques

    Terry Anthony Byrd;Kathy L. Cossick;Robert W. Zmud

Frequent Co-Authors

Vallabh Sambamurthy
Vallabh Sambamurthy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Terry Anthony Byrd
Terry Anthony Byrd Auburn University
Albert N. Link
Albert N. Link University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Vernon J. Richardson
Vernon J. Richardson University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Izak Benbasat
Izak Benbasat University of British Columbia
Joey F. George
Joey F. George Iowa State University
Chris F. Kemerer
Chris F. Kemerer University of Pittsburgh
Benn R. Konsynski
Benn R. Konsynski Emory University
Ephraim R. McLean
Ephraim R. McLean Georgia State University
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Business and Management opens doors to a wide variety of related fields and online opportunities. Professionals seeking management roles in specialized industries often turn to programs such as a construction management degree online accredited, which blends project leadership with practical knowledge specific to the construction sector.

The healthcare field is another rapidly growing area for management expertise. An healthcare administration degree online can prepare students for pivotal roles in hospitals and health systems, focusing on both operations and policy.

For those eager to advance their education quickly, consider fast degree programs that allow motivated learners to complete their studies and enter the workforce sooner.

Affordability and flexibility remain top concerns for adult learners and career changers. Many institutions now offer online business management degree programs, making it possible to balance career advancement with everyday life.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Zmud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles