World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9366 8754 4959 4518 105 8542

Julia K. Boehm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia K. Boehm between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia K. Boehm published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2018. 12 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2018. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
2003 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia K. Boehm: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 5
2010 2
2011 9
2012 2
2013 6
2014 3
2015 9
2016 11
2017 4
2018 12
2019 4
2020 11
2021 7
2022 10
2023 5
2024 5
2025 7
Total 118
Download as CSV

Julia K. Boehm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia K. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 105
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia K. Boehm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia K. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julia K. Boehm is affiliated with Chapman University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychological well-being, health outcomes, and cardiovascular medicine. Boehm has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, health, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work addresses key topics including psychological well-being and life satisfaction, health disparities and outcomes, optimism, hope, and well-being, as well as cardiovascular health and risk factors. Additional areas of focus are cardiac health and mental health, resilience and mental health, and behavioral health and interventions.

Boehm's recent publications reflect their contributions to these topics and fields. Notable papers include:

  • Positive emotions and favorable cardiovascular health: A 20-year longitudinal study, 2020, Preventive Medicine
  • Positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular disease: Exploring mechanistic and developmental pathways, 2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Other significant works relevant to their research area, authored by various investigators but connected to shared domains, include:

  • Sense of purpose in life and five health behaviors in older adults, 2020, Preventive Medicine
  • Interventions to Modify Psychological Well-Being: Progress, Promises, and an Agenda for Future Research, 2023, Affective Science
  • Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2024, UNC Libraries

Boehm frequently collaborates with other researchers in related areas. Their most frequent co-authors include Laura D. Kubzansky, Farah Qureshi, Anne-Josee Guimond, Jackie Soo, and Donald M. Lloyd-Jones. These collaborations have contributed to advancing understanding in psychological well-being and cardiovascular health.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in journals such as:

  • Health Psychology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Affective Science

Best Publications

  • The Heart's Content: The Association Between Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Health

    Julia K. Boehm;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being.

    Sonja Lyubomirsky;Rene Dickerhoof;Julia K. Boehm;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • Does Happiness Promote Career Success

    Julia K. Boehm;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • A longitudinal experimental study comparing the effectiveness of happiness-enhancing strategies in Anglo Americans and Asian Americans

    Julia K. Boehm;Sonja Lyubomirsky;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC Health Promotion Series

    Laura D. Kubzansky;Jeff C. Huffman;Julia K. Boehm;Rosalba Hernandez

  • Variety is the spice of happiness: The hedonic adaptation prevention model.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Julia K. Boehm;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • A prospective study of positive psychological well-being and coronary heart disease.

    Julia K. Boehm;Christopher Peterson;Mika Kivimaki;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Does Happiness Promote Career Success? Revisiting the Evidence:

    Lisa C. Walsh;Julia K. Boehm;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • Feasibility and utility of positive psychology exercises for suicidal inpatients

    Jeff C. Huffman;Christina M. DuBois;Brian C. Healy;Julia K. Boehm

  • Relationships between positive psychological constructs and health outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review

    Christina M. DuBois;Oriana Vesga Lopez;Eleanor E. Beale;Brian C. Healy

  • The Promise of Sustainable Happiness

    Julia K. Boehm;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • Is Optimism Associated With Healthier Cardiovascular-Related Behavior? Meta-Analyses of 3 Health Behaviors.

    Julia K. Boehm;Ying Chen;Hayami Koga;Maya B. Mathur

  • Maintaining Healthy Behavior: a Prospective Study of Psychological Well-Being and Physical Activity

    Eric S. Kim;Laura D. Kubzansky;Jackie Soo;Julia K. Boehm

  • Development of a positive psychology intervention for patients with acute cardiovascular disease

    Jeff C. Huffman;Carol A. Mastromauro;Julia K. Boehm;Rita Seabrook

  • TESTING FOR MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE IN THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE: A COMPARISON OF RUSSIANS AND NORTH AMERICANS

    Kari L. Tucker;Daniel J. Ozer;Sonja Lyubomirsky;Julia K. Boehm

  • Unequally Distributed Psychological Assets: Are There Social Disparities in Optimism, Life Satisfaction, and Positive Affect?

    Julia K. Boehm;Ying Chen;David R. Williams;Carol Ryff

  • Heart health when life is satisfying: evidence from the Whitehall II cohort study

    Julia K. Boehm;Christopher Peterson;Mika Kivimaki;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Sense of purpose in life and five health behaviors in older adults

    Eric S. Kim;Koichiro Shiba;Julia K. Boehm;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Association between optimism and serum antioxidants in the midlife in the United States study.

    Julia K. Boehm;David R. Williams;Eric B. Rimm;Carol Ryff

  • A Positive Psychology Intervention for Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Development and Proof-of-Concept Trial

    Jeff C. Huffman;Rachel A. Millstein;Carol A. Mastromauro;Shannon V. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University
Sonja Lyubomirsky
Sonja Lyubomirsky University of California, Riverside
Donald M. Lloyd-Jones
Donald M. Lloyd-Jones Northwestern University
Jeff C. Huffman
Jeff C. Huffman Harvard University
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Eric S. Kim
Eric S. Kim University of British Columbia
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania
Darwin R. Labarthe
Darwin R. Labarthe Northwestern University
Suzanne C. Segerstrom
Suzanne C. Segerstrom University of Kentucky
Carol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a variety of flexible career paths. Many students now choose online programs to balance their studies with work or personal commitments. Whether you aim to become a clinical psychologist, counselor, or pursue research, accredited online degrees can provide comprehensive training.

It’s important to compare program strengths across different regions. For example, the top psychology programs in New York City offer robust research opportunities and connections to prestigious hospitals. Similarly, the top psychology degrees in Newark are praised for their diverse practicum options and urban networking prospects.

If you prefer smaller communities, reviewing the top psychology degrees in New Hampshire can uncover schools with tight-knit faculty and personalized mentoring. On the West Coast, the best psychology degree rankings in Orange highlight programs known for innovative teaching and internship placements.

By researching these programs, you can align your studies with your career interests—whether that's clinical work, organizational psychology, or research. Carefully choosing the right online degree may open countless pathways in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Julia K. Boehm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles