World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
68
Citations
17859
World Ranking
2425
National Ranking
1092

David J. Segal publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Segal sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 186 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

David J. Segal D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Segal sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Segal is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cancer Research, and Oncology. The breadth of their work covers key topics such as Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Virus-based gene therapy research, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques.

Frequent venues for publication in Segal's career include Frontiers in Genome Editing, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nucleic Acids Research, Human Molecular Genetics, and Cancer Research. These platforms have featured multiple contributions that reflect their ongoing engagement with various aspects of genome editing and molecular genetics.

Segal has co-authored extensively with several researchers in their field. Notable frequent collaborators are Henriette O'Geen, Jill L. Silverman, Scott V. Dindot, Ulrika Beitnere, and Nycole A. Copping, with co-author counts ranging from six to fifteen joint publications.

Selected recent papers from Segal's body of work include:

  • "The NIH Somatic Cell Genome Editing program" (2021, Nature)
  • "An ASO therapy for Angelman syndrome that targets an evolutionarily conserved region at the start of the UBE3A-AS transcript" (2023, Science Translational Medicine)
  • "Translational outcomes in a full gene deletion of ubiquitin protein ligase E3A rat model of Angelman syndrome" (2020, Translational Psychiatry)
  • "Determinants of heritable gene silencing for KRAB-dCas9 + DNMT3 and Ezh2-dCas9 + DNMT3 hit-and-run epigenome editing" (2022, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • "Functional rescue in an Angelman syndrome model following treatment with lentivector transduced hematopoietic stem cells" (2021, Human Molecular Genetics)

Best Publications

  • TLR3 deficiency in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis.

    Shen Ying Zhang;Shen Ying Zhang;Emmanuelle Jouanguy;Emmanuelle Jouanguy;Sophie Ugolini;Asma Smahi

  • The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models

    András Kotschy;Zoltán Szlavik;James Murray;James Davidson

  • Stimulation of homologous recombination through targeted cleavage by chimeric nucleases.

    Marina Bibikova;Dana Carroll;David J. Segal;Jonathan K. Trautman

  • Toward controlling gene expression at will: Specific regulation of the erbB-2/HER-2 promoter by using polydactyl zinc finger proteins constructed from modular building blocks

    Roger R. Beerli;David J. Segal;Birgit Dreier;Carlos F. Barbas

  • Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases.

    Michal Szczepek;Vincent Brondani;Janine Büchel;Luis Serrano

  • Toward controlling gene expression at will: selection and design of zinc finger domains recognizing each of the 5'-GNN-3' DNA target sequences.

    David J. Segal;Birgit Dreier;Roger R. Beerli;Carlos F. Barbas

  • Transcriptional regulation in the immune system: all roads lead to AP-1.

    Victoria C. Foletta;David H. Segal;Donna R. Cohen

  • Design of polydactyl zinc-finger proteins for unique addressing within complex genomes

    Qiang Liu;David J. Segal;Jayant B. Ghiara;Carlos F. Barbas

  • Methods and compositions for using zinc finger endonucleases to enhance homologous recombination

    Monika Liljedahl;Simon Eric Aspland;David J. Segal

  • Development of zinc finger domains for recognition of the 5'-ANN-3' family of DNA sequences and their use in the construction of artificial transcription factors.

    Birgit Dreier;Roberta P. Fuller;David J. Segal;Caren V. Lund

  • Keep your fingers off my DNA: Protein-protein interactions mediated by C2H2 zinc finger domains

    Kathryn J. Brayer;David J. Segal

  • SRA- and SET-domain-containing proteins link RNA polymerase V occupancy to DNA methylation

    Lianna M. Johnson;Jiamu Du;Christopher J. Hale;Sylvain Bischof

  • The BCL2 selective inhibitor venetoclax induces rapid onset apoptosis of CLL cells in patients via a TP53-independent mechanism.

    Mary Ann Anderson;Mary Ann Anderson;Mary Ann Anderson;Jing Deng;John F. Seymour;John F. Seymour;Constantine Tam;Constantine Tam

  • Evaluation of a modular strategy for the construction of novel polydactyl zinc finger DNA-binding proteins.

    David J. Segal;Roger R. Beerli;Pilar Blancafort;Birgit Dreier

  • A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture

    Henriette O'Geen;Isabelle M. Henry;Mital S. Bhakta;Joshua F. Meckler

  • Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain

    Javier Gallego-Bartolomé;Jason Gardiner;Wanlu Liu;Ashot Papikian

  • Designing Transcription Factor Architectures for Drug Discovery

    Pilar Blancafort;David J. Segal;Carlos F. Barbas

  • Design, construction and in vitro testing of zinc finger nucleases

    Dana Carroll;J Jason Morton;Kelly J Beumer;David J Segal;David J Segal

  • Insights into the molecular recognition of the 5'-GNN-3' family of DNA sequences by zinc finger domains.

    Birgit Dreier;David J Segal;Carlos F Barbas

  • Custom Zinc-Finger Nucleases for Use in Human Cells

    Stephen Alwin;Maja B. Gere;Eva Guhl;Karin Effertz

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. S. Huang
David C. S. Huang Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Carlos F. Barbas
Carlos F. Barbas Scripps Research Institute
Guillaume Lessene
Guillaume Lessene Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Marco J. Herold
Marco J. Herold Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Andreas Strasser
Andreas Strasser Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Andrew W. Roberts
Andrew W. Roberts Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Joel P. Mackay
Joel P. Mackay University of Sydney
Peter E. Czabotar
Peter E. Czabotar Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Dana Carroll
Dana Carroll University of Utah
Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona
Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to many related fields and online degree options in healthcare. If you’re interested in the administrative side, earning a healthcare administration degree online is a popular choice for flexibility and affordability. Many students also pursue a degree in healthcare administration through accelerated programs, which can help fast-track your entry into the workforce.

For those seeking patient-care roles, there are easy nursing colleges to get into, some of which offer accessible online pathways. Additionally, the growing demand for specialists in medical data means that medical coding certification can be a valuable asset for a Genetics-related career with less direct patient interaction.

Exploring these related degrees and certifications can expand your career opportunities in healthcare, from clinical practice to management and health informatics.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Segal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles