World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Finland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 95 780 682 3 2 464 30162

Marko Elovainio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marko Elovainio between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marko Elovainio published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 18.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2007. 55 of the 603 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2007. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 41 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 33 publications
1993 2025

603 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marko Elovainio: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 7
2001 8
2002 7
2003 20
2004 10
2005 21
2006 26
2007 41
2008 32
2009 32
2010 23
2011 22
2012 20
2013 24
2014 23
2015 28
2016 28
2017 26
2018 28
2019 25
2020 27
2021 23
2022 21
2023 14
2024 22
2025 33
Total 603
Download as CSV

Marko Elovainio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Elovainio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–470 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 464 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28 464
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marko Elovainio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Elovainio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78 95
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Finland Leader Award

Overview

Marko Elovainio is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their research spans several key fields, primarily focused on psychology, health professions, and social sciences. Within these overarching disciplines, their work often intersects with subfields such as general health professions, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, and social psychology.

The scholar's scientific contributions address a range of topics related to health and social factors, including health disparities and outcomes, workplace health and well-being, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, employment and welfare studies, stress and burnout among healthcare professionals, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Marko Elovainio has published in various venues, with frequent appearances in outlets such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), BMJ Open, Scientific Reports, Journal of Affective Disorders, and the American Journal of Epidemiology. Their research output includes analyses combining large datasets and observational studies, often employing cohort data to explore health-related phenomena.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Hospital-treated infectious diseases and the risk of dementia: a large, multicohort, observational study with a replication cohort, 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Pandemic Dreams: Network Analysis of Dream Content During the COVID-19 Lockdown, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Association of social isolation, loneliness and genetic risk with incidence of dementia: UK Biobank Cohort Study, 2022, BMJ Open
  • Association of social isolation and loneliness with risk of incident hospital-treated infections: an analysis of data from the UK Biobank and Finnish Health and Social Support studies, 2023, The Lancet Public Health
  • Network structure of depression symptomology in participants with and without depressive disorder: the population-based Health 2000-2011 study, 2020, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

The scientist collaborates frequently with a variety of peers, with coauthors including Christian Hakulinen, Laura Pulkki-Råbäck, Kaisla Komulainen, Marianna Virtanen, and Mika Kivimäki. This network reflects interdisciplinary research efforts across psychology, public health, and epidemiology.

Best Publications

  • Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease - a meta-analysis

    Mika Kivimäki;Marianna Virtanen;Marko Elovainio;Anne Kouvonen

  • Organizational Justice: Evidence of a New Psychosocial Predictor of Health

    Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki;Jussi Vahtera

  • Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression

    M Kivimäki;M Virtanen;M Vartia;M Elovainio

  • Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff

    Mika Kivimäki;Marko Elovainio;Jussi Vahtera

  • Associations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 with cognitive symptoms of depression: 12-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study.

    D. Gimeno;M. Kivimäki;E. J. Brunner;M. Elovainio

  • Contribution of risk factors to excess mortality in isolated and lonely individuals: an analysis of data from the UK Biobank cohort study

    Marko Elovainio;Marko Elovainio;Christian Hakulinen;Christian Hakulinen;Laura Pulkki-Råback;Marianna Virtanen

  • PERSONALITY AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT META-ANALYSIS OF 10 COHORT STUDIES.

    Christian Hakulinen;Marko Elovainio;Marko Elovainio;Laura Pulkki-Råback;Marianna Virtanen

  • Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain.

    Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki;Klaus Helkama

  • Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality: UK Biobank cohort study of 479 054 men and women

    Christian Hakulinen;Laura Pulkki-Råback;Marianna Virtanen;Markus Jokela

  • A short version of the Team Climate inventory : Development and psychometric properties

    Mika Kivimaki;Marko Elovainio

  • Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: Complementary or redundant models?

    Mika Kivimäki;Jussi Vahtera;Marko Elovainio;Marianna Virtanen

  • Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: a prospective cohort study of three different models.

    Jaana Ylipaavalniemi;Mika Kivimäki;Mika Kivimäki;Marko Elovainio;Marianna Virtanen

  • The Beck Depression Inventory and General Health Questionnaire as measures of depression in the general population: A validation study using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview as the gold standard

    Anna-Mari Aalto;Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki;Antti Uutela

  • Long Working Hours and Sleep Disturbances: The Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study

    Marianna Virtanen;Jane E. Ferrie;David Gimeno;David Gimeno;Jussi Vahtera

  • Job demands and job control as correlates of early retirement thoughts in Finnish social and health care employees

    Marko Elovainio;Pauli Forma;Mika Kivimäki;Timo Sinervo

  • Psychometric evaluation of a short measure of social capital at work

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Mika Kivimäki;Jussi Vahtera;Tuula Oksanen

  • Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees.

    Marko Elovainio;Kees van den Bos;Anne Linna;Mika Kivimäki;Mika Kivimäki

  • Socioeconomic Position, Co-Occurrence of Behavior-Related Risk Factors, and Coronary Heart Disease: the Finnish Public Sector Study

    Mika Kivimäki;Debbie A. Lawlor;George Davey Smith;Anne Kouvonen

  • Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: pooled analysis of three cohort studies

    Markus Jokela;Markus Jokela;Laura Pulkki-Råback;Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki

  • Low Workplace Social Capital as a Predictor of Depression The Finnish Public Sector Study

    Anne Kouvonen;Tuula Oksanen;Jussi Vahtera;Mai Stafford

  • PERSONALITY AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT META-ANALYSIS OF 10 COHORT STUDIES

    Christian Hakulinen;Marko Elovainio;Laura Pulkki-Raback;Marianna Virtanen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Jussi Vahtera
Jussi Vahtera Turku University Hospital
Olli T. Raitakari
Olli T. Raitakari Turku University Hospital
Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen University of Helsinki
Laura Pulkki-Råback
Laura Pulkki-Råback University of Helsinki
Marianna Virtanen
Marianna Virtanen University of Eastern Finland
Markus Jokela
Markus Jokela University of Helsinki
Tarja Heponiemi
Tarja Heponiemi Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Mirka Hintsanen
Mirka Hintsanen University of Oulu
Christian Hakulinen
Christian Hakulinen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology opens the door to several related online degrees and meaningful career pathways, especially in counseling. Many students interested in understanding human behavior and mental health pursue degrees in counseling, social work, or clinical psychology. Online programs offer flexibility for those balancing studies with work or family responsibilities.

Accreditation and location are key considerations. Programs in different states can vary in curriculum, practicum requirements, and specialization opportunities. For example, best counseling degree programs in Michigan offer a diverse range of concentrations, including school and mental health counseling. Those in the Midwest might consider the best counseling degree programs in the Midwest, which provide specialized tracks and robust practicum experiences.

If you’re located in the North, exploring the best college counseling programs in Minnesota can connect you to top-ranked faculty and state-specific licensing guidance. Alternatively, the best counseling program rankings in Mississippi highlight Southern programs known for their supportive learning environments and practical training. Each pathway can shape your skills for a rewarding career as a counselor, therapist, or mental health advocate.

Best Scientists Citing Marko Elovainio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles