World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2827 2586 26 26 172 7788

Tarja Heponiemi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tarja Heponiemi between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tarja Heponiemi published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 16 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 14 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 3 publications
2003 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tarja Heponiemi: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 6
2008 8
2009 4
2010 8
2011 10
2012 7
2013 12
2014 9
2015 5
2016 3
2017 1
2018 14
2019 19
2020 14
2021 21
2022 15
2023 13
2024 13
2025 3
Total 197
Download as CSV

Tarja Heponiemi publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarja Heponiemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 172 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 172
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Tarja Heponiemi D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarja Heponiemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Tarja Heponiemi is affiliated with the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland. Their research primarily focuses on health professions, with a strong concentration in general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, health information management, applied psychology, and demography.

Their work extensively covers topics related to telemedicine and telehealth implementation, electronic health records systems, digital mental health interventions, mobile health and mHealth applications, health literacy and information accessibility, technology use by older adults, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Heponiemi has authored several papers, including:

  • Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era, 2022, BMC Health Services Research
  • Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey, 2022, Digital Health

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including Anu-Marja Kaihlanen, Lotta Virtanen, Emma Kainiemi, Kia Gluschkoff, and Elina Laukka. Collaborative work with these coauthors spans multiple publications and reflects interdisciplinary approaches in health and digital health research.

Heponiemi's research has been published in numerous academic venues. Notable frequent publication sites include the European Journal of Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMC Health Services Research, JMIR Medical Informatics, and Digital Health. These platforms indicate a consistent engagement with digital health research communities and public health scholarship.

Best Publications

  • Workplace Violence Against Nursing Students and Nurses: An Italian Experience

    Nicola Magnavita;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Violence towards health care workers in a Public Health Care Facility in Italy: a repeated cross-sectional study

    Nicola Magnavita;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Increasing cultural awareness: qualitative study of nurses’ perceptions about cultural competence training

    Anu Marja Kaihlanen;Laura Hietapakka;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Social support and the likelihood of maintaining and improving levels of physical activity: the Whitehall II Study

    Anne Kouvonen;Roberto De Vogli;Mai Stafford;Martin J. Shipley

  • BIS/BAS sensitivity and self-rated affects during experimentally induced stress

    Tarja Heponiemi;Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen;Sampsa Puttonen;Niklas Ravaja

  • Job strain and adverse health behaviors: the Finnish Public Sector Study.

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Ari Väänänen;Tarja Heponiemi

  • The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey

    Unknown

  • The prospective effects of workplace violence on physicians' job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the buffering effect of job control.

    Tarja Heponiemi;Anne Kouvonen;Marianna Virtanen;Jukka Vänskä

  • Reflective and Automatic Processes in Health Care Professional Behaviour: a Dual Process Model Tested Across Multiple Behaviours

    Justin Presseau;Marie Johnston;Tarja Heponiemi;Marko Elovainio;Marko Elovainio

  • Temperament and depressive symptoms: a population-based longitudinal study on Cloninger's psychobiological temperament model.

    Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki;Sampsa Puttonen;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Cardiac autonomic reactivity and recovery in predicting carotid atherosclerosis: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study.

    Tarja Heponiemi;Marko Elovainio;Laura Pulkki;Sampsa Puttonen

  • Job attitudes and well-being among public vs. private physicians: organizational justice and job control as mediators

    Tarja Heponiemi;Hannamaria Kuusio;Timo Sinervo;Marko Elovainio

  • Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study

    Tarja Heponiemi;Vesa Jormanainen;Lars Leemann;Kristiina Manderbacka

  • Organizational justice and health; review of evidence.

    Marko Elovainio;Tarja Heponiemi;Timo Sinervo;Nicola Magnavita

  • The longitudinal effects of social support and hostility on depressive tendencies.

    Tarja Heponiemi;Marko Elovainio;Mika Kivimäki;Laura Pulkki

  • Health, psychosocial factors and retirement intentions among Finnish physicians

    Tarja Heponiemi;Anne Kouvonen;Jukka Vänskä;Hannu Halila

  • Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Mika Kivimäki;Marianna Virtanen;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Chronic workplace stress and insufficient physical activity: a cohort study

    Anne Kouvonen;Jussi Vahtera;Jussi Vahtera;Jussi Vahtera;Tuula Oksanen;Jaana Pentti

  • Depressive symptoms and carotid artery intima-media thickness in young adults: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.

    Marko Elovainio;Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen;Mika Kivimäki;Laura Pulkki

  • Sense of coherence and diabetes: A prospective occupational cohort study

    Anne M Kouvonen;Ari Väänänen;Stephen A Woods;Tarja Heponiemi

  • Association of Contractual and Subjective Job Insecurity With Sickness Presenteeism Among Public Sector Employees

    Tarja Heponiemi;Marko Elovainio;Jaana Pentti;Marianna Virtanen

  • Experienced time pressure and stress: electronic health records usability and information technology competence play a role.

    Tuulikki Vehko;Hannele Hyppönen;Sampsa Puttonen;Sari Kujala

  • Sense of coherence and psychiatric morbidity: a 19-year register-based prospective study

    Anne M Kouvonen;Ari Väänänen;Jussi Vahtera;Tarja Heponiemi

Frequent Co-Authors

Marko Elovainio
Marko Elovainio University of Helsinki
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Jussi Vahtera
Jussi Vahtera Turku University Hospital
Sampsa Puttonen
Sampsa Puttonen Tampere University
Ari Väänänen
Ari Väänänen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Nicola Magnavita
Nicola Magnavita Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Marianna Virtanen
Marianna Virtanen University of Eastern Finland
Jaana Pentti
Jaana Pentti University of Turku
Justin Presseau
Justin Presseau Ottawa Hospital
Martin P Eccles
Martin P Eccles Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse and flexible study options. Many students now choose online programs to fast-track their education or keep costs low while balancing other commitments. For those seeking efficiency, options like one year masters programs online offer an accelerated path to advanced credentials in fields like sociology, psychology, and education.

Likewise, students interested in earning undergraduate degrees faster can consider an accelerated bachelor's degree online. These programs allow learners to progress at their own pace and potentially graduate months or years sooner than traditional formats.

Cost is another key consideration. Those passionate about social work can find the most affordable msw programs online, making it easier to enter this rewarding and high-demand field. Similarly, aspiring Board Certified Behavior Analysts can pursue the cheapest bcba online program to reduce educational debt while advancing their careers.

These flexible and affordable pathways enable more students to pursue impactful roles in the social sciences and humanities sector, while adapting to their personal timelines and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Tarja Heponiemi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles