World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Justin Presseau

Justin Presseau

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2744 2507 154 145 195 10943

Justin Presseau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin Presseau between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin Presseau published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2023. 32 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2023. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 47 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 31 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin Presseau: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 1
2011 2
2012 4
2013 8
2014 10
2015 9
2016 9
2017 19
2018 20
2019 25
2020 24
2021 42
2022 47
2023 48
2024 22
2025 31
2026 1
Total 328
Download as CSV

Justin Presseau publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin Presseau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 195
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin Presseau D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin Presseau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Justin Presseau is affiliated with the Ottawa Hospital in Canada and has produced research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their publications span various subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, and Applied Psychology.

The research topics covered by Presseau include:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Justin Presseau has contributed to a number of recent papers published between 2020 and 2021, including:

  • Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers, 2021, BMJ
  • 'Doing' or 'using' intersectionality? Opportunities and challenges in incorporating intersectionality into knowledge translation theory and practice, 2021, International Journal for Equity in Health
  • Behavioural interventions delivered through interactive social media for health behaviour change, health outcomes, and health equity in the adult population, 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour, 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: A scoping review, 2021, EBioMedicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Presseau are:

  • Jeremy Grimshaw
  • Dean Fergusson
  • Noah Ivers
  • Jamie Brehaut
  • Nicola McCleary

Presseau's work is frequently published in the following venues:

  • BMJ Open
  • Implementation Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • HRB Open Research
  • Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease

Best Publications

  • Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour

    Falko F Sniehotta;Justin Presseau;Vera Araújo-Soares

  • Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey

    Sarah A. Birken;Byron J. Powell;Christopher M. Shea;Emily R. Haines;Emily R. Haines

  • Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review

    Sarah A. Birken;Byron J. Powell;Justin Presseau;M. Alexis Kirk;M. Alexis Kirk

  • Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

    Justin Presseau;Justin Presseau;Nicola McCleary;Nicola McCleary;Fabiana Lorencatto;Andrea M. Patey

  • Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

    Benjamin Brown;Wouter T. Gude;Thomas Blakeman;Sabine N. van der Veer

  • Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

    Johanna M Huijg;Winifred A Gebhardt;Mathilde R Crone;Elise Dusseldorp

  • Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of physical activity policies in schools: A systematic review.

    Nicole Nathan;Ben Elton;Mark Babic;Nicole McCarthy

  • Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness: An Integrative Overview.

    Vera Araújo-Soares;Nelli Elisa Hankonen;Justin Presseau;Justin Presseau;Angela Rodrigues

  • Using a behaviour change techniques taxonomy to identify active ingredients within trials of implementation interventions for diabetes care.

    Justin Presseau;Noah M Ivers;James J Newham;Keegan Knittle

  • Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review

    Dominika Kwasnicka;Justin Presseau;Martin White;Falko F. Sniehotta

  • T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool.

    Sarah A. Birken;Catherine L. Rohweder;Byron J. Powell;Christopher M. Shea

  • Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers

    Luke Wolfenden;Robbie Foy;Justin Presseau;Justin Presseau;Jeremy M Grimshaw;Jeremy M Grimshaw

  • ‘Just one more episode’: Frequency and theoretical correlates of television binge watching:

    Emily Walton-Pattison;Stephan U Dombrowski;Justin Presseau

  • Risks and Benefits of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Emma J.M. Grigor;Dean Fergusson;Natasha Kekre;Joshua Montroy

  • Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

    E Graham-Rowe;E Graham-Rowe;F Lorencatto;J G Lawrenson;J M Burr

  • The Habitual Use of the Self-report Habit Index

    Falko F. Sniehotta;Justin Presseau

  • Reflective and Automatic Processes in Health Care Professional Behaviour: a Dual Process Model Tested Across Multiple Behaviours

    Justin Presseau;Marie Johnston;Tarja Heponiemi;Marko Elovainio;Marko Elovainio

  • 'Doing' or 'using' intersectionality? Opportunities and challenges in incorporating intersectionality into knowledge translation theory and practice.

    Christine Kelly;Danielle Kasperavicius;Diane Duncan;Cole Etherington

  • Behavioural interventions delivered through interactive social media for health behaviour change, health outcomes, and health equity in the adult population

    Jennifer Petkovic;Stephanie Duench;Jessica Trawin;Omar Dewidar

  • Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour

    Nicole Etherington;Isabel Braganca Rodrigues;Lora Giangregorio;Lora Giangregorio;Ian D. Graham;Ian D. Graham

  • Looking inside the black box: a theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational materials (the Ontario printed educational message, OPEM) to improve referral and prescribing practices in primary care in Ontario, Canada

    Jeremy M Grimshaw;Merrick Zwarenstein;Jacqueline M Tetroe;Gaston Godin

  • Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids

    Ian D Graham;Jo Logan;Carol L Bennett;Justin Presseau

  • Stressful work environment and wellbeing: What comes first?

    Marko Elovainio;Tarja Heponiemi;Markus Jokela;Christian Hakulinen

  • Goal conflict and goal facilitation as predictors of daily accelerometer-assessed physical activity.

    Justin Presseau;Richard I. Tait;Derek W. Johnston;Jill J. Francis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital
Jill J Francis
Jill J Francis University of Melbourne
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University
Marko Elovainio
Marko Elovainio University of Helsinki
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Martin P Eccles
Martin P Eccles Newcastle University
Ian D. Graham
Ian D. Graham Ottawa Hospital
Dean Fergusson
Dean Fergusson Ottawa Hospital
Tarja Heponiemi
Tarja Heponiemi Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing social sciences and humanities in the USA opens a wide range of online degree options and flexible career pathways. Many students are drawn to advanced programs such as the psy d programs, which are designed for those aiming to become licensed clinical psychologists. For future marriage and family therapists, the best online mft programs offer accelerated yet comprehensive training with pathways leading to licensure.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. If you are asking, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology, there are a variety of affordable online programs available to help reduce financial burden while maintaining academic quality.

For those interested in education leadership, the shortest online edd programs provide fast-track options to earn a doctoral degree and move into higher-level administrative or policy roles quickly.

With flexible online degrees and diverse career possibilities, the fields of social sciences and humanities remain accessible and rewarding for motivated learners.

Best Scientists Citing Justin Presseau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles