World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 116 4319 4049 167 159 390 55529

Jeffrey S. Ginsberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey S. Ginsberg between 1985 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey S. Ginsberg published across 37 years, from 1985 to 2021, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2000. 9 of the 389 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2000. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications
1985 2021

389 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg: publications per year, 1985 to 2021
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 8
1990 8
1991 7
1992 11
1993 9
1994 10
1995 18
1996 11
1997 19
1998 19
1999 10
2000 20
2001 18
2002 18
2003 17
2004 16
2005 20
2006 16
2007 9
2008 17
2009 10
2010 11
2011 5
2012 7
2013 9
2014 14
2015 12
2016 8
2017 4
2018 10
2019 3
2020 6
2021 3
Total 389
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Ginsberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Ginsberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 390 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 390
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Ginsberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Ginsberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 116
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey S. Ginsberg is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work covers a range of topics related to heart conditions and blood coagulation.

Their subfields of study include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Internal Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Hematology

Main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Their recent papers include:

  • Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in 2020 and Beyond, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Why are Event Rates Higher in Clinical Practice than in Randomized Trials?-A Systematic Review, 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Plasma Apixaban Levels in Patients Treated Off Label With the Lower Dose, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Can a Single Measurement of Apixaban Levels Identify Patients at Risk of Overexposure? A Prospective Cohort Study, 2022, TH Open
  • Plasma Rivaroxaban Level to Identify Patients at Risk of Drug Overexposure: Is a Single Measurement of Drug Level Reliable?, 2021, TH Open

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Noel Chan
  • Vinai Bhagirath
  • Jack Hirsh
  • John W. Eikelboom
  • Tim A.C. de Vries

Their publications appear regularly in journals such as:

  • TH Open
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Future Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Derivation of a Simple Clinical Model to Categorize Patients Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Increasing the Models Utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer

    Philip S. Wells;David R. Anderson;Marc Rodger;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

  • A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis.

    Mark Levine;Michael Gent;Jack Hirsh;Jacques Leclerc

  • A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

    Clive Kearon;Michael Gent;Michael Gent;Jack Hirsh;Jack Hirsh;Jeffrey Weitz

  • Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

    Philip S. Wells;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg;David R. Anderson;Clive Kearon

  • Comparison of Low-Intensity Warfarin Therapy With Conventional-Intensity Warfarin Therapy for Long-Term Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

    Clive Kearon;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg;Michael J. Kovacs;David R. Anderson

  • A Comparison of Two Intensities of Warfarin for the Prevention of Recurrent Thrombosis in Patients with the Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

    Mark A. Crowther;Jeff S. Ginsberg;Jim Julian;Judah Denburg

  • Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis

    PhilipS. Wells;Jack Hirsh;DavidR. Anderson;AnthonyW.A. Lensing

  • Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism

    JW tenCate;HR Buller;M Gent;J Hirsh

  • Determinants and Time Course of the Postthrombotic Syndrome after Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

    Susan R Kahn;Ian Shrier;Jim A Julian;Thierry Ducruet

  • Incidence of Recurrent Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications Among Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in Relation to Both Malignancy and Achieved International Normalized Ratio: A Retrospective Analysis

    Barbara A. Hutten;Martin H. Prins;Michael Gent;Jeff Ginsberg

  • Noninvasive Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis

    C Kearon;J A Julian;T E Newman;J S Ginsberg

  • Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature.

    Wee Shian Chan;Sonia Anand;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

  • Oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs North American enoxaparin regimen for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery.

    Jeffrey S Ginsberg;Bruce L Davidson

  • Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism.

    James D. Douketis;Clive Kearon;Shannon Bates;Eric K. Duku

  • Use of Antithrombotic Agents During Pregnancy: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

    Shannon M. Bates;Ian A. Greer;Jack Hirsh;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

  • Safety of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

    Bernd-Jan Sanson;Anthonie W. A. Lensing;Martin H. Prins;Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

  • Heparin for 5 Days as Compared with 10 Days in the Initial Treatment of Proximal Venous Thrombosis

    Russell D. Hull;Gary E. Raskob;David Rosenbloom;Akbar A. Panju

  • Does This Patient Have Deep Vein Thrombosis

    Sonia S. Anand;Philip S. Wells;Dereck Hunt;Dereck Hunt;Pat Brill-Edwards

  • Use of Antithrombotic Agents During Pregnancy

    Jeffrey S. Ginsberg;Jack Hirsh

  • Determinants and Time Course of the Postthrombotic Syndrome after Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

    S.R. Kahn;I. Shrier;J.A. Julian

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Hirsh
Jack Hirsh McMaster University
Clive Kearon
Clive Kearon McMaster University
James D. Douketis
James D. Douketis McMaster University
Mark Crowther
Mark Crowther McMaster University
John W. Eikelboom
John W. Eikelboom Population Health Research Institute
Susan R. Kahn
Susan R. Kahn McGill University
Michael Gent
Michael Gent McMaster University
Jim A. Julian
Jim A. Julian McMaster University
Jeffrey I. Weitz
Jeffrey I. Weitz McMaster University
Alexander G.G. Turpie
Alexander G.G. Turpie McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in medicine but want to explore alternative or flexible academic pathways, there are several online options to consider. Many students are taking advantage of programs that allow a fast transition into healthcare roles, especially if they come from non-traditional backgrounds.

For instance, those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree may be eligible for non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs. These direct-entry graduate programs help career changers become registered nurses more quickly. If you’re looking to enter the nursing field at the associate level, there are online adn programs for non nurses that offer foundational nursing education without prior experience.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. Medical billing and coding is a critical support role, and you can prepare for this field through the best online medical billing and coding schools, some of which offer financial aid options.

Admission requirements also vary. If standardized entrance exams are a concern, explore nursing programs that address the question, do you have to take a teas test for lpn, to find schools that do not require the TEAS or HESI exams.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles