World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shlomo Berkovsky

Shlomo Berkovsky

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7264
World Ranking
8405
National Ranking
258

Shlomo Berkovsky publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shlomo Berkovsky sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Shlomo Berkovsky D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shlomo Berkovsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shlomo Berkovsky is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and has a substantial body of research contributions in the intersection of computer science and medicine. Their work spans multiple fields of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Health Informatics, and Health Information Management.

The main fields of study covered in their publications include:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

The subfields where Shlomo Berkovsky has contributed are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Shlomo Berkovsky's research addresses various topics, particularly focusing on the applications of AI and machine learning in healthcare and medical imaging. The key topics of their work include:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Topic Modeling
  • Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study (2021, BMJ)
  • Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status prediction in histopathology images of gliomas using deep learning (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners (2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association)
  • Deep convolutional neural networks based ECG beats classification to diagnose cardiovascular conditions (2021, Biomedical Engineering Letters)
  • Clinical named entity recognition and relation extraction using natural language processing of medical free text: A systematic review (2023, International Journal of Medical Informatics)

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Shlomo Berkovsky include:

  • Enrico Coiera
  • Sidong Liu
  • Hao Xiong
  • Juan C. Quiroz
  • Dana Rezazadegan

Their publications have appeared in a variety of academic venues, with several journals and conferences hosting multiple works, such as:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Group-based recipe recommendations: analysis of data aggregation strategies

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Jill Freyne

  • Mediation of User Models: for Enhanced Personalization in Recommender Systems

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Tsvi Kuflik;Francesco Ricci

  • Intelligent food planning: personalized recipe recommendation

    Jill Freyne;Shlomo Berkovsky

  • The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review.

    Ahmet Baki Kocaballi;Shlomo Berkovsky;Juan C Quiroz;Liliana Laranjo

  • Cross-Domain Mediation in Collaborative Filtering

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Tsvi Kuflik;Francesco Ricci

  • Enhancing privacy and preserving accuracy of a distributed collaborative filtering

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Yaniv Eytani;Tsvi Kuflik;Francesco Ricci

  • Cross-Domain Recommender Systems.

    Iván Cantador;Ignacio Fernández-Tobías;Shlomo Berkovsky;Paolo Cremonesi

  • Influencing individually: fusing personalization and persuasion

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Jill Freyne;Harri Oinas-Kukkonen

  • Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Mac Coombe;Jill Freyne;Dipak Bhandari

  • Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study

    Gioacchino Tangari;Muhammad Ikram;Kiran Ijaz;Mohamed Ali Kaafar

  • Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status prediction in histopathology images of gliomas using deep learning.

    Sidong Liu;Zubair Shah;Zubair Shah;Aydin Sav;Carlo Russo

  • Features Predicting Weight Loss in Overweight or Obese Participants in a Web-Based Intervention: Randomized Trial

    Emily Brindal;Jill Freyne;Ian Saunders;Shlomo Berkovsky

  • Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden

    Juan C. Quiroz;Liliana Laranjo;Ahmet Baki Kocaballi;Shlomo Berkovsky

  • Applying Differential Privacy to Matrix Factorization

    Arnaud Berlioz;Arik Friedman;Mohamed Ali Kaafar;Roksana Boreli

  • Privacy Aspects of Recommender Systems

    Arik Friedman;Bart P. Knijnenburg;Kris Vanhecke;Luc Martens

  • A differential privacy framework for matrix factorization recommender systems

    Arik Friedman;Shlomo Berkovsky;Mohamed Ali Kaafar

  • Detecting Personality Traits Using Eye-Tracking Data

    Shlomo Berkovsky;Ronnie Taib;Irena Koprinska;Eileen Wang

  • Putting things in context: Challenge on Context-Aware Movie Recommendation

    Alan Said;Shlomo Berkovsky;Ernesto W. De Luca

  • Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners

    A Baki Kocaballi;A Baki Kocaballi;Kiran Ijaz;Liliana Laranjo;Liliana Laranjo;Juan C Quiroz

  • Design and pilot results of a mobile phone weight-loss application for women starting a meal replacement programme

    Emily Brindal;Gilly Hendrie;Jill Freyne;Mac Coombe

  • Optimal greedy diversity for recommendation

    Azin Ashkan;Branislav Kveton;Shlomo Berkovsky;Zheng Wen

Frequent Co-Authors

Tsvi Kuflik
Tsvi Kuflik University of Haifa
Francesco Ricci
Francesco Ricci Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Enrico Coiera
Enrico Coiera Macquarie University
Mohamed Ali Kaafar
Mohamed Ali Kaafar Macquarie University
Branislav Kveton
Branislav Kveton Adobe Systems (United States)
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Manny Noakes
Manny Noakes Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Timothy Baldwin
Timothy Baldwin University of Melbourne
Geert-Jan Houben
Geert-Jan Houben Delft University of Technology
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up numerous online degree and career opportunities in related technical fields. Many students are interested in how specialized engineering disciplines connect with computer science. For example, if your interests span sustainability and technology, environmental engineering schools online offer flexible pathways to careers in green tech and environmental research.

Likewise, a strong background in problem-solving and computational methods can lead you to an online mechanical engineering degree, where you’ll study engineering principles relevant to automation, robotics, and manufacturing.

For those curious about foundational sciences, you might wonder, can you get a physics degree online? These programs merge theoretical knowledge with analytical and computation skills that are highly valued in tech industries.

If you’re aiming for a career focused on analytics, AI, and machine learning, following a structured data science learning path can unlock opportunities in one of today’s fastest-growing job sectors. Each of these online degrees builds a unique bridge to rewarding technology-based careers.

Best Scientists Citing Shlomo Berkovsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles