World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
63
Citations
36024
World Ranking
1135
National Ranking
84

Jill J Francis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill J Francis sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 269 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jill J Francis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill J Francis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jill J Francis is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a notable focus on General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their research spans several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology, and Oncology.

Their work concentrates on key topics such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Health Systems and Economic Evaluations, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation, and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare. Additional areas of research include the Delphi Technique in Research and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Jill J Francis has published papers in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to Implementation Science, BMC Health Services Research, Research Square, Supportive Care in Cancer, and GLOBAL PSYCHIATRY ARCHIVES. Among recent publications are:

  • Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions, 2022, BMC Health Services Research
  • Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework, 2022, Implementation Science
  • Changing behaviour, 'more or less': do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?, 2021, Implementation Science
  • Why trials lose participants: A multitrial investigation of participants' perspectives using the theoretical domains framework, 2021, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis, 2021, International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Throughout their career, Jill J Francis has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Jeremy Grimshaw, Sanne Peters, Fabiana Lorencatto, Linda Denehy, and Jamie Brehaut.

Best Publications

  • The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions

    Susan Michie;Michelle Richardson;Marie Johnston;Marie Johnston;Charles Abraham

  • What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies

    Jill J Francis;Marie Johnston;Clare Robertson;Liz Glidewell

  • A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

    Lou Atkins;Jill J Francis;Jill J Francis;Rafat Islam;Denise O'Connor

  • Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework

    Mandeep Sekhon;Martin Cartwright;Jill J. Francis

  • From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques

    Susan Michie;Marie Johnston;Jillian Joy Francis;Wendy Hardeman

  • Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework

    Simon David French;Simon David French;Sally Elizabeth Green;Denise Ann O'Connor;Joanne Ellen McKenzie

  • Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)

    Susan Michie;Caroline E Wood;Marie Johnston;Marie Johnston;Charles Abraham

  • Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework

    Jill J Francis;Denise A O'Connor;Janet A Curran

  • Do self- reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review

    Martin P. Eccles;Susan Hrisos;Jill J. Francis;Eileen F S Kaner

  • No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention.

    Noah M Ivers;Anne Sales;Heather Colquhoun;Susan Michie

  • Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol

    Susan Michie;Charles Abraham;Martin Eccles;Jillian Joy Francis

  • Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review

    Sarah A. Birken;Byron J. Powell;Justin Presseau;M. Alexis Kirk;M. Alexis Kirk

  • Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

    Justin Presseau;Justin Presseau;Nicola McCleary;Nicola McCleary;Fabiana Lorencatto;Andrea M. Patey

  • Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

    Benjamin Brown;Wouter T. Gude;Thomas Blakeman;Sabine N. van der Veer

  • Evidence‐based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour

    Jill J. Francis;Charlotte Stockton;Martin P. Eccles;Marie Johnston

  • Anesthesiologists' and surgeons' perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians' decisions to order pre-operative tests.

    Andrea M Patey;Rafat Islam;Jill J Francis;Gregory L Bryson;Gregory L Bryson

  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Treatments for Varicose Veins

    Julie Brittenden;Seonaidh C Cotton;Andrew Elders;Craig R Ramsay

  • Prevalence and causes of prescribing errors: the PRescribing Outcomes for Trainee Doctors Engaged in Clinical Training (PROTECT) study.

    Cristín Ryan;Sarah Ross;Peter Davey;Eilidh M. Duncan

  • Acceptability of health care interventions: A theoretical framework and proposed research agenda

    Mandeep Sekhon;Martin Cartwright;Jill J. Francis

  • A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians’ beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

    Rafat Islam;Alan T Tinmouth;Alan T Tinmouth;Jill J Francis;Jamie C Brehaut;Jamie C Brehaut

  • Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review.

    Susan Hrisos;Martin P Eccles;Jill J Francis;Heather O Dickinson

  • Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map.

    Vikki Ann Entwistle;Danielle Firnigl;Mandy Ryan;Jillian Joy Francis

  • Learning curves, taking instructions, and patient safety: using a theoretical domains framework in an interview study to investigate prescribing errors among trainee doctors

    Eilidh M Duncan;Jill J. Francis;Marie Johnston;Peter Davey

  • 'It's a can of worms' : understanding primary care practitioners' behaviours in relation to HPV using the theoretical domains framework

    Lisa A McSherry;Stephan U Dombrowski;Jill J Francis;Judith Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Martin P Eccles
Martin P Eccles Newcastle University
Justin Presseau
Justin Presseau Ottawa Hospital
Wendy Hardeman
Wendy Hardeman University of East Anglia
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Marko Elovainio
Marko Elovainio University of Helsinki
Marion K Campbell
Marion K Campbell University of Aberdeen
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens a diverse range of online education options tailored for different career goals. Students can explore online masters degree programs, which often provide flexibility and allow working professionals to upskill within a year. These degrees can enhance expertise in areas like sociology, psychology, or international relations.

Those interested in starting or completing undergraduate study may consider online bachelor degree programs. Many accelerated options are available, making it possible to graduate faster and enter the workforce sooner.

For specialized professional careers, options like an msw degree (Master of Social Work) are available online. Graduates can pursue social work licensure and make a direct impact in their communities. Individuals interested in applied behavioral analysis may pursue bcba accredited programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, expanding their opportunities in education, mental health, and therapy services.

Each pathway provides unique opportunities for advancement and can help graduates meet the demands of today’s dynamic social sector job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jill J Francis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles