World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 63 1135 995 84 77 269 36024

Jill J Francis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jill J Francis between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jill J Francis published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2015. 30 of the 361 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2015. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 8 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 13 publications
1994 2025

361 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jill J Francis: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 8
2006 2
2007 6
2008 10
2009 11
2010 16
2011 11
2012 23
2013 25
2014 36
2015 42
2016 20
2017 12
2018 17
2019 18
2020 7
2021 20
2022 19
2023 24
2024 17
2025 13
Total 361
Download as CSV

Jill J Francis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill J Francis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 269 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 269
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jill J Francis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill J Francis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77 63
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jill J Francis is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a notable focus on General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their research spans several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology, and Oncology.

Their work concentrates on key topics such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Health Systems and Economic Evaluations, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation, and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare. Additional areas of research include the Delphi Technique in Research and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Jill J Francis has published papers in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to Implementation Science, BMC Health Services Research, Research Square, Supportive Care in Cancer, and GLOBAL PSYCHIATRY ARCHIVES. Among recent publications are:

  • Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions, 2022, BMC Health Services Research
  • Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework, 2022, Implementation Science
  • Changing behaviour, 'more or less': do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?, 2021, Implementation Science
  • Why trials lose participants: A multitrial investigation of participants' perspectives using the theoretical domains framework, 2021, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis, 2021, International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Throughout their career, Jill J Francis has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Jeremy Grimshaw, Sanne Peters, Fabiana Lorencatto, Linda Denehy, and Jamie Brehaut.

Best Publications

  • The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions

    Susan Michie;Michelle Richardson;Marie Johnston;Marie Johnston;Charles Abraham

  • What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies

    Jill J Francis;Marie Johnston;Clare Robertson;Liz Glidewell

  • A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems

    Lou Atkins;Jill J Francis;Jill J Francis;Rafat Islam;Denise O'Connor

  • Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework

    Mandeep Sekhon;Martin Cartwright;Jill J. Francis

  • From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques

    Susan Michie;Marie Johnston;Jillian Joy Francis;Wendy Hardeman

  • Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework

    Simon David French;Simon David French;Sally Elizabeth Green;Denise Ann O'Connor;Joanne Ellen McKenzie

  • Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)

    Susan Michie;Caroline E Wood;Marie Johnston;Marie Johnston;Charles Abraham

  • Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework

    Jill J Francis;Denise A O'Connor;Janet A Curran

  • Do self- reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review

    Martin P. Eccles;Susan Hrisos;Jill J. Francis;Eileen F S Kaner

  • No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention.

    Noah M Ivers;Anne Sales;Heather Colquhoun;Susan Michie

  • Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol

    Susan Michie;Charles Abraham;Martin Eccles;Jillian Joy Francis

  • Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review

    Sarah A. Birken;Byron J. Powell;Justin Presseau;M. Alexis Kirk;M. Alexis Kirk

  • Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

    Justin Presseau;Justin Presseau;Nicola McCleary;Nicola McCleary;Fabiana Lorencatto;Andrea M. Patey

  • Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

    Benjamin Brown;Wouter T. Gude;Thomas Blakeman;Sabine N. van der Veer

  • Evidence‐based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour

    Jill J. Francis;Charlotte Stockton;Martin P. Eccles;Marie Johnston

  • Anesthesiologists' and surgeons' perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians' decisions to order pre-operative tests.

    Andrea M Patey;Rafat Islam;Jill J Francis;Gregory L Bryson;Gregory L Bryson

  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Treatments for Varicose Veins

    Julie Brittenden;Seonaidh C Cotton;Andrew Elders;Craig R Ramsay

  • Prevalence and causes of prescribing errors: the PRescribing Outcomes for Trainee Doctors Engaged in Clinical Training (PROTECT) study.

    Cristín Ryan;Sarah Ross;Peter Davey;Eilidh M. Duncan

  • Acceptability of health care interventions: A theoretical framework and proposed research agenda

    Mandeep Sekhon;Martin Cartwright;Jill J. Francis

  • A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians’ beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

    Rafat Islam;Alan T Tinmouth;Alan T Tinmouth;Jill J Francis;Jamie C Brehaut;Jamie C Brehaut

  • Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review.

    Susan Hrisos;Martin P Eccles;Jill J Francis;Heather O Dickinson

  • Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map.

    Vikki Ann Entwistle;Danielle Firnigl;Mandy Ryan;Jillian Joy Francis

  • Learning curves, taking instructions, and patient safety: using a theoretical domains framework in an interview study to investigate prescribing errors among trainee doctors

    Eilidh M Duncan;Jill J. Francis;Marie Johnston;Peter Davey

  • 'It's a can of worms' : understanding primary care practitioners' behaviours in relation to HPV using the theoretical domains framework

    Lisa A McSherry;Stephan U Dombrowski;Jill J Francis;Judith Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Martin P Eccles
Martin P Eccles Newcastle University
Justin Presseau
Justin Presseau Ottawa Hospital
Wendy Hardeman
Wendy Hardeman University of East Anglia
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Marko Elovainio
Marko Elovainio University of Helsinki
Marion K Campbell
Marion K Campbell University of Aberdeen
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens a diverse range of online education options tailored for different career goals. Students can explore online masters degree programs, which often provide flexibility and allow working professionals to upskill within a year. These degrees can enhance expertise in areas like sociology, psychology, or international relations.

Those interested in starting or completing undergraduate study may consider online bachelor degree programs. Many accelerated options are available, making it possible to graduate faster and enter the workforce sooner.

For specialized professional careers, options like an msw degree (Master of Social Work) are available online. Graduates can pursue social work licensure and make a direct impact in their communities. Individuals interested in applied behavioral analysis may pursue bcba accredited programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, expanding their opportunities in education, mental health, and therapy services.

Each pathway provides unique opportunities for advancement and can help graduates meet the demands of today’s dynamic social sector job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jill J Francis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles