World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
C. Richard Chapman

C. Richard Chapman

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
11499
World Ranking
5065
National Ranking
2269

C. Richard Chapman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Richard Chapman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 197 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

C. Richard Chapman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Richard Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Richard Chapman is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary domains, notably within the social sciences and medicine. The main fields of study include social sciences with an emphasis on sociology and political science, as well as medicine, covering anesthesiology, pain medicine, cardiology, and surgery.

Their scholarly work has addressed diverse topics such as cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes; pain management and opioid use; anesthesia and pain management; healthcare and environmental waste management; climate change and health impacts; healthcare cost, quality, and practices; and child welfare and adoption.

Chapman's recent publications feature the following:

  • Towards Better Perioperative Pain Management in Mexico: A Study in a Network of Hospitals Using Quality Improvement Methods from PAIN OUT (2021, Journal of Pain Research)
  • An Educational Intervention to Reduce Regulated Medical Waste: The Inpatient Medicine and Outpatient Dermatology Settings (2025, International Journal of Dermatology)
  • Affinity through Vulnerability: The Politics of Positionality in Child Welfare (2023, Medicine Anthropology Theory)
  • Drinking Embodied: Gift, Commodity, and the Construction of Transnational Japanese Identity in Honolulu (2020, Japanese Studies)
  • Supplemental Figure S1 (2021, Zenodo - CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Frequent coauthors in their research include Ana Lilia Garduño-López, Victor Manuel Acosta Nava, Lisette Castro Garcés, Dulce María Rascón-Martínez, and Luis Felipe Cuéllar-Guzmán.

The primary publication venues for Chapman's work are:

  • Journal of Pain Research
  • International Journal of Dermatology
  • Medicine Anthropology Theory
  • Japanese Studies
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Pain measurement: an overview

    C. R. Chapman;K. L. Casey;R. Dubner;K. M. Foley

  • Pain and stress in a systems perspective: reciprocal neural, endocrine, and immune interactions.

    C. Richard Chapman;Robert P. Tuckett;Chan Woo Song

  • Suffering: the contributions of persistent pain.

    C Richard Chapman;Jonathan Gavrin

  • The Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Chronic Pain: An Integrative Overview of Research on Mechanisms

    C. Richard Chapman;Charles J. Vierck

  • Pain, depression, and illness behavior in a Pain Clinic population

    I. Pilowsky;C.Richard Chapman;John J. Bonica

  • Psychological interventions for chronic pain: a critical review. I. Relaxation training and biofeedback.

    Judith A. Turner;C.Richard Chapman

  • Psychological interventions for chronic pain: a critical review. II Operant conditioning, hypnosis, and cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Judith A. Turner;C.Richard Chapman

  • Brain evoked potentials are functional correlates of induced pain in man.

    Andrew C.N. Chen;C. Richard Chapman;Stephen W. Harkins

  • Toward validation of pain measurement tools for children: a pilot study

    Donald C. Tyler;Ahn Tu;Joanne Douthit;C.Richard Chapman;C.Richard Chapman

  • Suffering and its Relationship to Pain

    Unknown

  • Issues in Pain Measurement

    C. Richard Chapman;John D. Loeser

  • Improving individual measurement of postoperative pain: the pain trajectory.

    C. Richard Chapman;Gary W. Donaldson;Jennifer J. Davis;David H. Bradshaw

  • Naloxone fails to reverse pain thresholds elevated by acupuncture: acupuncture analgesia reconsidered.

    C. Richard Chapman;Costantino Benedetti;Yoko H. Colpitts;Rebecca Gerlach

  • Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain evoked potentials and pain report.

    C. Richard Chapman;C. Richard Chapman;Shunichi Oka;David H. Bradshaw;Robert C. Jacobson

  • Opioid pharmacotherapy for chronic non-cancer pain in the United States: a research guideline for developing an evidence-base.

    C. Richard Chapman;David L. Lipschitz;Martin S. Angst;Roger Chou

  • Postoperative Pain Trajectories in Chronic Pain Patients Undergoing Surgery: The Effects of Chronic Opioid Pharmacotherapy on Acute Pain

    C. Richard Chapman;Jennifer Davis;Gary W. Donaldson;Justin Naylor

  • Emotional disclosure through patient narrative may improve pain and well-being: results of a randomized controlled trial in patients with cancer pain.

    M. Soledad Cepeda;C. Richard Chapman;Nelcy Miranda;Ricardo Sanchez

  • Detection and decision factors in pain perception in young and elderly men.

    Stephen W. Harkins;C.Richard Chapman

  • Comparative efficacy of patient-controlled administration of morphine, hydromorphone, or sufentanil for the treatment of oral mucositis pain following bone marrow transplantation.

    Barbara A Coda;Barbara A Coda;Barbara O'Sullivan;Gary Donaldson;Sharol Bohl

  • Analgesia following transcutaneous electrical stimulation and its partial reversal by a narcotic antagonist.

    C.Richard Chapman;Costantino Benedetti

  • Sensory decision theory methods in pain research: A reply to Rollman☆

    C.Richard Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith A. Turner
Judith A. Turner University of Washington
David Madigan
David Madigan Northeastern University
Kathleen M. Foley
Kathleen M. Foley Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John D. Loeser
John D. Loeser University of Washington
Charles J. Vierck
Charles J. Vierck University of Florida
Mark Sullivan
Mark Sullivan University of Southampton
Barbara A. Gilchrest
Barbara A. Gilchrest Harvard University
Jennifer D. Davis
Jennifer D. Davis Brown University
Earl Hunt
Earl Hunt University of Washington
Jean E. Sanders
Jean E. Sanders Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience but prefer flexible learning, there are several related online degree options and career pathways worth considering. Programs now range from foundational bachelor's degrees to advanced certifications, making it easier than ever to start or advance your career from anywhere.

For students seeking cost-effective alternatives, online college degrees offer convenience and affordability while covering essential topics in biology, psychology, and health sciences. Those looking to specialize further and boost their earning potential might explore online certificate programs that pay well, opening doors to roles in research labs, healthcare, and mental health services.

Aspiring mental health professionals can pursue an online MSW (Master of Social Work), which is ideal for those interested in counseling or social services. Alternatively, fast-track your expertise with an accelerated bcba program online to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst—a growing field that integrates neuroscience with applied behavioral science. These options provide flexible and affordable routes to rewarding careers related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing C. Richard Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles