World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
117
Citations
63265
World Ranking
4144
National Ranking
2270

William J. Rogers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 394 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Rogers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Rogers is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences domain, with a particular focus on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

Their body of work addresses numerous topics, including:

  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
  • Potato Plant Research
  • Genetics and Plant Breeding

William J. Rogers has contributed articles to several publication venues, including:

  • Acta Horticulturae
  • Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Recent papers co-authored or linked to their research span a range of subjects and journals:

  • Updated guidelines for gene nomenclature in wheat (2023), published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  • Selecting a method/tool for risk-based decision making in complex situations (2021), published in Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • How to treat expert judgment? With certainty it contains uncertainty! (2020), published in Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Phytoestrogen blood levels and adverse outcomes in women with suspected ischemic heart disease (2020), published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Heteroalleles in Common Wheat: Multiple Differences between Allelic Variants of the Gli-B1 Locus (2021), published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • A. M. Castagnino
  • Karina Elizabeth Díaz
  • Carl J. Pepine
  • C. Noel Bairey Merz
  • María Belén Rosini

Best Publications

  • Preliminary report: Effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction

    W. J. Rogers;A. E. Epstein;J. G. Arciniegas;S. M. Dailey

  • The Sleep Disorder Canine Narcolepsy Is Caused by a Mutation in the Hypocretin (Orexin) Receptor 2 Gene

    Ling Lin;Juliette Faraco;Robin Li;Hiroshi Kadotani

  • A mutation in a case of early onset narcolepsy and a generalized absence of hypocretin peptides in human narcoleptic brains

    Christelle Peyron;Juliette Faraco;William Rogers;Beth Ripley

  • Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis.

    D M Herrington;D M Reboussin;K B Brosnihan;P C Sharp

  • Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

    Cannon Cp;Gibson Cm;Lambrew Ct;Shoultz Da

  • Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. SOLVD Investigators

    Vera Bittner;Debra H. Weiner;Salim Yusuf;William J. Rogers

  • Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease.

    C. Noel Bairey Merz;Leslee J. Shaw;Steven E. Reis;Vera Bittner

  • Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illnesses

    Ron D. Hays;Kenneth B. Wells;Cathy Donald Sherbourne;William Rogers

  • Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization

    Matthew T. Roe;Paul W. Armstrong;Keith A.A. Fox;Harvey D. White

  • Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain.

    John G. Canto;Michael G. Shlipak;William J. Rogers;Judith A. Malmgren

  • Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the U.S. from 1990 through 1999: The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3

    William J. Rogers;John G. Canto;Costas T. Lambrew;Alan J. Tiefenbrunn

  • Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies.

    Leslee J. Shaw;C. Noel Bairey Merz;Carl J. Pepine;Steven E. Reis

  • Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study: Improvement of Cardiac Ischemia at 1 Year After PTCA and CABG

    Martial G. Bourassa;Genell L. Knatterud;Carl J. Pepine;George Sopko

  • Association of age and sex with myocardial infarction symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality

    John G. Canto;William J. Rogers;Robert J. Goldberg;Eric D. Peterson

  • Effects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant Vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial

    David D. Waters;Edwin L. Alderman;Judith Hsia;Barbara V. Howard

  • Complex HLA-DR and -DQ Interactions Confer Risk of Narcolepsy-Cataplexy in Three Ethnic Groups

    Emmanuel Mignot;Ling Lin;William Rogers;Yutaka Honda

  • Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

    W J Rogers;L J Bowlby;N C Chandra;W J French

  • Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS)

    B R Chaitman;M G Bourassa;K Davis;W J Rogers

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction is highly prevalent in women with chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease: Results from the NHLBI WISE study

    Steven E. Reis;Richard Holubkov;A.J.Conrad Smith;Sheryl F. Kelsey

  • Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial

    Jennifer G. Robinson;Bettina S. Nedergaard;William J. Rogers;Jonathan Fialkow

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard O. Russell
Richard O. Russell King's College London
George Sopko
George Sopko National Institutes of Health
Carl J. Pepine
Carl J. Pepine University of Florida
C. Noel Bairey Merz
C. Noel Bairey Merz Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sheryl F. Kelsey
Sheryl F. Kelsey University of Pittsburgh
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Vera Bittner
Vera Bittner University of Alabama at Birmingham
Martial G. Bourassa
Martial G. Bourassa Montreal Heart Institute
Gerald M. Pohost
Gerald M. Pohost University of Southern California
Joel M. Gore
Joel M. Gore University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean following a single, traditional path. Today, online degree programs offer greater flexibility and specialized routes into the healthcare field. If you want to enter the workforce quickly, you might consider what is the fastest way to become an lpn and start making a difference as a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time.

For those interested in advanced practice or mental health, many turn to specialized graduate programs. The fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program options online can help you move forward in this high-demand area efficiently and at your own pace.

Cost is also a major concern for many students. It’s worthwhile to look into the cheapest online health science degree programs, which offer quality education without the heavy financial burden. Graduate-level students seeking leadership roles in healthcare can benefit from finding an affordable mha online program, making career advancement more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles