World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 118 4039 3784 2213 2049 886 55712

Joel M. Gore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joel M. Gore between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joel M. Gore published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2009. 2 of the 887 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2009. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 13 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 16 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 48 publications 2003: 37 publications 2004: 54 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 43 publications 2007: 51 publications 2008: 45 publications 2009: 58 publications 2010: 38 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1974 2024

887 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joel M. Gore: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 6
1983 1
1984 13
1985 4
1986 8
1987 16
1988 10
1989 6
1990 11
1991 18
1992 7
1993 10
1994 9
1995 8
1996 9
1997 6
1998 20
1999 11
2000 10
2001 16
2002 48
2003 37
2004 54
2005 31
2006 43
2007 51
2008 45
2009 58
2010 38
2011 29
2012 35
2013 38
2014 34
2015 45
2016 36
2017 33
2018 14
2019 6
2020 5
2021 2
2022 3
2023 0
2024 2
Total 887
Download as CSV

Joel M. Gore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel M. Gore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 886 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 886
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Joel M. Gore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel M. Gore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joel M. Gore is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other subfields include Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medicine, and Pharmacology.

Their work covers several key topics, including:

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Joel M. Gore has contributed to a number of recent papers, which include the following publications:

  • Differential effect of anticoagulation according to cognitive function and frailty in older patients with atrial fibrillation, 2022, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Age Differences in the Chief Complaint Associated With a First Acute Myocardial Infarction and Patient's Care-Seeking Behavior, 2020, The American Journal of Medicine
  • Presence of Geriatric Conditions Is Prognostic of Major Bleeding in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a Cohort Study, 2022, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Temporal Trends and Patient Characteristics Associated with 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rates after a First Acute Myocardial Infarction, 2021, The American Journal of Medicine
  • Age and Sex Differences and Temporal Trends in the Use of Invasive and Noninvasive Procedures in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 2022, Journal of the American Heart Association

Their frequent coauthors include Darleen Lessard, Robert J. Goldberg, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Jordy Mehawej, and Hawa O. Abu.

Joel M. Gore's research has been published in several journals, notably:

  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • The American Journal of Medicine
  • Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Best Publications

  • An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction.

    Maarten Simoons;Eric Topol;Robert Califf;Frans van de Werf

  • A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome:estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry

    Kim A Eagle;Michael J Lim;Omar H Dabbous;Karen S Pieper

  • Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

    Cannon Cp;Gibson Cm;Lambrew Ct;Shoultz Da

  • Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.

    Karen P. Alexander;L. Kristin Newby;Christopher P. Cannon;Paul W. Armstrong

  • Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006

    Keith A A Fox;Philippe Gabriel Steg;Kim A Eagle;Shaun G Goodman

  • Treatment of Hypertension in the Prevention and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention

    Clive Rosendorff;Henry R. Black;Christopher P. Cannon;Bernard J. Gersh

  • Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI

    David D. McManus;Joel M. Gore;Jorge L. Yarzebski;Frederick A. Spencer

  • Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

    Philippe Gabriel Steg;Robert J Goldberg;Joel M Gore;Keith A.A Fox

  • Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population-Based Perspective

    Robert J. Goldberg;Frederick A. Spencer;Joel M. Gore;Darleen M. Lessard

  • Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

    Robert J. Goldberg;Navid A. Samad;Jorge L. Yarzebski;Jerry H. Gurwitz

  • Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

    Alvaro Avezum;Marcia Makdisse;Frederick Spencer;Joel M. Gore

  • Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: Incidence and Mortality from a Community-Wide Perspective, 1975 to 1988

    Robert J. Goldberg;Joel M. Gore;Joseph S. Alpert;Voula Osganian

  • Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial.

    Edwin G. Bovill;Michael L. Terrin;David C. Stump;Andrew D. Berke

  • Seasonal distribution of acute myocardial infarction in the second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

    Frederick A. Spencer;Robert J. Goldberg;Richard C. Becker;Joel M. Gore

  • Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Per Olav Vandvik;A. Michael Lincoff;Joel M. Gore;David D. Gutterman

  • A community-wide assessment of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    Joel M. Gore;Robert J. Goldberg;David H. Spodick;Joseph S. Alpert

  • The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular function: a report on tissue-type plasminogen activator and streptokinase from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI Phase I) trial.

    F H Sheehan;E Braunwald;P Canner;H T Dodge

  • Trends in presenting characteristics and hospital mortality among patients with ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006

    William J. Rogers;Paul D. Frederick;Edna Stoehr;John G. Canto

  • REPRINT Treatment of Hypertension in the Prevention and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention

    Clive Rosendorff;Henry R. Black;Christopher P. Cannon;Bernard J. Gersh

  • Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE)☆

    P.G. Steg;R.J. Goldberg;J.M. Gore

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Goldberg
Robert J. Goldberg University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Frederick A. Spencer
Frederick A. Spencer McMaster University
Jerry H. Gurwitz
Jerry H. Gurwitz University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Frederick A. Anderson
Frederick A. Anderson University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
James E. Dalen
James E. Dalen University of Arizona
Joseph S. Alpert
Joseph S. Alpert University of Arizona
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher B. Granger
Christopher B. Granger Duke University
Shaun G. Goodman
Shaun G. Goodman University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up unique career pathways in healthcare and medicine. For those interested in nutrition and preventive medicine, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition provides a strong foundation in dietetics and wellness, enabling graduates to support patient health through better food choices.

If you’re seeking advanced healthcare leadership roles, consider a cahme accredited online mha. These programs develop essential management skills while ensuring high academic standards, preparing you for executive positions within healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses aiming to further their education without added clinical requirements might choose an rn to bsn online with no clinicals. This pathway provides flexibility, allowing working nurses to advance their qualifications and career prospects efficiently.

For nurses ready to reach the highest level of practice, the shortest online dnp program options offer an expedited path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These programs focus on clinical expertise and leadership, helping graduates drive innovation in healthcare delivery.

Best Scientists Citing Joel M. Gore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles