World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 144 1410 1303 823 748 1363 104172

Carl J. Pepine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carl J. Pepine between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carl J. Pepine published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 25.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 95 publications in 2021. 52 of the 1,448 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 95. Peak 95 publications in 2021. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 22 publications 1979: 19 publications 1980: 13 publications 1981: 16 publications 1982: 22 publications 1983: 24 publications 1984: 23 publications 1985: 26 publications 1986: 24 publications 1987: 21 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 32 publications 1996: 25 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 30 publications 1999: 23 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 56 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 39 publications 2007: 30 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 43 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 49 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 69 publications 2021: 95 publications 2022: 53 publications 2023: 57 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 25 publications
1970 2025

1,448 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carl J. Pepine: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 4
1973 3
1974 5
1975 3
1976 2
1977 5
1978 22
1979 19
1980 13
1981 16
1982 22
1983 24
1984 23
1985 26
1986 24
1987 21
1988 10
1989 6
1990 19
1991 15
1992 11
1993 5
1994 14
1995 32
1996 25
1997 19
1998 30
1999 23
2000 14
2001 11
2002 21
2003 26
2004 56
2005 19
2006 39
2007 30
2008 20
2009 30
2010 33
2011 31
2012 34
2013 48
2014 34
2015 41
2016 43
2017 58
2018 49
2019 43
2020 69
2021 95
2022 53
2023 57
2024 27
2025 25
Total 1,448
Download as CSV

Carl J. Pepine publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl J. Pepine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,361–1,380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,363 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28 1,363
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Carl J. Pepine D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl J. Pepine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144–145 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 144 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109 144
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carl J. Pepine is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a dominant concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Within this field, their work spans related subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, molecular biology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their main topics of research cover a range of cardiovascular conditions and diagnostic approaches. These include cardiac imaging and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, cardiovascular function and risk factors, coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiovascular disease and adiposity, blood pressure and hypertension studies, and cardiovascular issues in pregnancy.

The following selected papers highlight their recent scientific contributions:

  • Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure (2021, The Lancet)
  • Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Effect of Antithrombotic Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Outpatients With Clinically Stable Symptomatic COVID-19 (2021, JAMA)
  • Altered Gut Microbiome Profile in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (2020, Hypertension)

Carl J. Pepine frequently collaborates with several coauthors in the field. Notable frequent coauthors include:

  • C. Noel Bairey Merz
  • Eileen Handberg
  • Janet Wei
  • Galen Cook-Wiens
  • Steven M. Smith

Their research has appeared repeatedly in particular publication venues, reinforcing the focus area within cardiovascular medicine. These venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal
  • Hypertension

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Executive summary and recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina)

    Eugene Braunwald;Elliott M. Antman;John W. Beasley;Robert M. Califf

  • ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article

    Eugene Braunwald;Elliott M Antman;John W Beasley;Robert M Califf

  • Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European society of cardiology.

    Franz H Messerli;Giuseppe Mancia;Charles Richard Conti;Carl J Pepine

  • Sertraline Treatment of Major Depression in Patients With Acute MI or Unstable Angina

    Alexander H. Glassman;Christopher M. O'Connor;Robert M. Califf;Karl Swedberg

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions

    Patrick J. Scanlon;David P. Faxon;Anne Marie Audet;Blase Carabello

  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition With Quinapril Improves Endothelial Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) Study

    G.B. J. Mancini;G. C. Henry;C. Macaya;B. J. O'Neill

  • Gut Dysbiosis Is Linked to Hypertension

    Tao Yang;Monica M. Santisteban;Vermali Rodriguez;Eric Li

  • A Calcium Antagonist vs a Non-Calcium Antagonist Hypertension Treatment Strategy for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Carl J. Pepine;Eileen M. Handberg;Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff;Ronald G. Marks

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

    Eugene Braunwald;Elliott M Antman;John W Beasley;Robert M Califf

  • Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

    James J Ferguson;Robert M Califf;Elliott M Antman;Marc Cohen

  • Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease.

    C. Noel Bairey Merz;Leslee J. Shaw;Steven E. Reis;Vera Bittner

  • Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators

    William E. Boden;Robert A. O'Rourke;Michael H. Crawford;Alvin S. Blaustein

  • Dogma Disputed: Can Aggressively Lowering Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Be Dangerous?

    Franz H Messerli;Giuseppe Mancia;C Richard Conti;Ann C Hewkin

  • Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies.

    Leslee J. Shaw;C. Noel Bairey Merz;Carl J. Pepine;Steven E. Reis

  • Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.

    Carl J. Pepine;R. David Anderson;Barry L. Sharaf;Steven E. Reis

  • Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial.

    Bernard R. Chaitman;Carl J. Pepine;John O. Parker;Jaroslav Skopal

  • Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study: Improvement of Cardiac Ischemia at 1 Year After PTCA and CABG

    Martial G. Bourassa;Genell L. Knatterud;Carl J. Pepine;George Sopko

  • Effect of Enalapril On Myocardial-infarction and Unstable Angina in Patients With Low Ejection Fractions

    Salim Yusuf;Carl J. Pepine;C. Garces;H. Pouleur

  • Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.

    Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff;Yan Gong;Eileen M. Handberg;Anthony A. Bavry

  • ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of Hypertension

    Wilbert S. Aronow;Jerome L. Fleg;Carl J. Pepine;Nancy T. Artinian

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Noel Bairey Merz
C. Noel Bairey Merz Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
George Sopko
George Sopko National Institutes of Health
Sheryl F. Kelsey
Sheryl F. Kelsey University of Pittsburgh
William J. Rogers
William J. Rogers University of Alabama at Birmingham
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Julie A. Johnson
Julie A. Johnson University of Florida
Mohan K. Raizada
Mohan K. Raizada University of Florida
Vera Bittner
Vera Bittner University of Alabama at Birmingham
Timothy D. Henry
Timothy D. Henry Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Jawahar L. Mehta
Jawahar L. Mehta University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in broadening your healthcare career options beyond traditional medical school, there are a variety of online degrees that open new pathways in the industry. For registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners, rn to np programs provide a flexible route to advanced practice roles, often allowing you to continue working while you study.

Nutrition is another growing field; an nutrition bachelor degree online can prepare students for roles in healthcare settings, research, or wellness industries, all with the convenience of remote study.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, cahme-accredited online mha programs offer recognized credentials for aspiring managers and administrators in hospitals and clinics.

Current RNs seeking to advance without hands-on requirements can consider rn bsn online programs no clinicals, which allow you to upgrade your qualification from ADN to BSN in a purely online format.

These online degree pathways provide diverse options for those looking to enhance their impact and expertise in healthcare, whether in direct patient care, leadership, or specialized areas like nutrition.

Best Scientists Citing Carl J. Pepine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles