World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
11971
World Ranking
6081
National Ranking
3305

Earl Hunt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Earl Hunt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 215 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Earl Hunt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Earl Hunt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Earl Hunt was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology and medicine, with notable contributions in experimental and cognitive psychology as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their work encompassed subfields such as social psychology, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics included cognitive abilities and testing, kidney stones and urolithiasis treatments, emotional intelligence and performance, genetic associations and epidemiology, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, healthcare policy and management, and gallbladder and bile duct disorders.

Among Earl Hunt's recent papers were these publications:

  • "Racial and Ethnic Representation in Nephrolithiasis Guidelines: Are They Generalizable?" (2024) published in Urology
  • "Index" (2023) published by Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • "Physician and Patient Adherence to Kidney Stone Prevention Guidelines in a Diverse, Low-resource, Urban Population" (2025) published in Urology
  • "Reply to Editorial Comment on 'Physician and Patient Adherence to Kidney Stone Prevention Guidelines in a Diverse, Low-Resource, Urban Population'" (2025) published in Urology
  • "Narrative medicine" (2025) published in The New Scientist

Earl Hunt collaborated frequently with several coauthors throughout their career. Significant collaborators included Richard J. Haier and Roberto Colom, each coauthoring 16 publications with Hunt. Other notable coauthors were B Edelblute, Kara Watts, and Alexander Small, with 3 joint publications each.

Publications were often featured in venues such as Urology, Cambridge University Press eBooks, and The New Scientist. Earl Hunt also contributed to book publications, including the title The Science of Human Intelligence (2023), published by Cambridge University Press, which had been cited 25 times.

Their career was recognized through awards such as the James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2011 and the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 1975.

Best Publications

  • Experiments in induction

    Earl B. Hunt;Janet Marin;Philip J. Stone

  • A System for the Behavioral Assessment of Athletic Coaches.

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Earl Hunt

  • Mechanics of Verbal Ability.

    Earl Hunt

  • The Transfer of Spatial Knowledge in Virtual Environment Training

    David Waller;Earl Hunt;David Knapp

  • Intelligence as an information-processing concept

    Erl K. Hunt

  • What does it mean to be high verbal

    Earl Hunt;Clifford Lunneborg;Joe Lewis

  • The Whorfian Hypothesis: A Cognitive Psychology Perspective

    Earl Hunt;Franca Agnoli

  • Individual Differences in the Verification of Sentence-Picture Relationships

    Colin M. Macleod;Earl B. Hunt;Nancy N. Mathews

  • Concept learning,: An information processing problem

    Earl B. Hunt

  • Individual Differences in Cognition: A New Approach to Intelligence

    Earl Hunt;Nancy Frost;Clifford Lunneborg

  • Information processing correlates of reading

    John Palmer;Colin M MacLeod;Earl Hunt;Janet E Davidson

  • Toward a Mediational Model of Coach-Player Relationships.

    Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith;Bill Curtis;Earl Hunt

  • The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology

    Michael W. Eysenck;Andrew W. Ellis;Earl B. Hunt;P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE SPEED OF MENTAL ROTATION

    Cynthia Berg;Christopher Hertzog;Earl Hunt

  • Ability factors and cognitive processes

    Marcy Lansman;Gary Donaldson;Earl Hunt;Steven Yantis

  • Comparing the Tortoise and the Hare: Gender Differences and Experience in Dynamic Spatial Reasoning Tasks

    David J. Law;James W. Pellegrino;Earl B. Hunt

  • Memory impairment in epileptic patients: selective effects of phenobarbital concentration

    Colin M. MacLeod;Anatole S. Dekabian;Earl Hunt

  • Individual Differences in Attention.

    Earl Hunt;James W. Pellegrino;Penny L. Yee

  • On the nature of intelligence

    Earl Hunt

  • Spatial representations of virtual mazes: the role of visual fidelity and individual differences.

    David Waller;David Knapp;Earl B. Hunt

Frequent Co-Authors

David Madigan
David Madigan Northeastern University
Ann P. Streissguth
Ann P. Streissguth University of Washington
Lee Roy Beach
Lee Roy Beach University of Arizona
C. Richard Chapman
C. Richard Chapman University of Utah
Michael W. Eysenck
Michael W. Eysenck Royal Holloway University of London
Frank L. Smoll
Frank L. Smoll University of Washington
Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Philip N. Johnson-Laird Princeton University
Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
Ronald E. Smith
Ronald E. Smith University of Washington
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online educational and career possibilities in the USA. Many students choose to specialize in school counseling, a field that combines psychological expertise with practical support for K-12 learners. Requirements for these roles often vary by state, so it's important to understand local guidelines before embarking on this path.

For instance, those interested in learning how to become a school counselor in Vermont will find that specific coursework and licensure steps are required. Similarly, becoming a school counselor in Virginia involves meeting state-specific academic and training standards.

It’s also essential to explore the requirements to be a school counselor in Washington if considering work in the Pacific Northwest. Likewise, understanding West Virginia school counselor education requirements can help you make informed decisions about your degree and certification options.

Whether your goal is counseling, research, or therapy, online psychology degrees can provide flexibility and a pathway to a rewarding career in education and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Earl Hunt

Recently Published Articles