World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
12546
World Ranking
8056
National Ranking
4313

Frank L. Smoll publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank L. Smoll sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank L. Smoll D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank L. Smoll sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Frank L. Smoll is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their career in academic research is noted primarily through their recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1992.

Although specific publication data, such as recent papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues, are not available in the current dataset, the APA fellowship highlights a level of professional engagement and contribution to the field of psychology.

No detailed records of main or subfields of study, book publications, or major topics of research are present for this scientist. However, the association with a major American university may suggest involvement in broader psychological research or academic activities related to that institution.

The absence of specific papers, coauthors, and topic data limits a detailed overview of their research focus or output. The established recognition by the APA nevertheless indicates a standing in the professional community relevant to psychology or related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Sport-Specific Psychological Skills: The Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28

    Ronald E. Smith;Robert W. Schutz;Frank L. Smoll;J.T. Ptacek

  • A System for the Behavioral Assessment of Athletic Coaches.

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Earl Hunt

  • Coach Effectiveness Training: A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach to Enhancing Relationship Skills in Youth Sport Coaches

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Bill Curtis

  • Effects of a Motivational Climate Intervention for Coaches on Young Athletes’ Sport Performance Anxiety

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Sean P. Cumming

  • Leadership Behaviors in Sport: A Theoretical Model and Research Paradigm1

    Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith

  • Measurement of Multidimensional Sport Performance Anxiety in Children and Adults: The Sport Anxiety Scale-2

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Sean P. Cumming;Joel R. Grossbard

  • Enhancement of children's self-esteem through social support training for youth sport coaches.

    Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith;Nancy P. Barnett;John J. Everett

  • Effects of Enhancing Coach-Athlete Relationships on Youth Sport Attrition

    Nancy P. Barnett;Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith

  • Conjunctive moderator variables in vulnerability and resiliency research: life stress, social support and coping skills, and adolescent sport injuries.

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;John T. Ptacek

  • Self-Esteem and Children's Reactions to Youth Sport Coaching Behaviors: A Field Study of Self-Enhancement Processes.

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll

  • Reduction of children's sport performance anxiety through social support and stress-reduction training for coaches

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Nancy P. Barnett

  • Enhancing Coach-Parent Relationships in Youth Sports: Increasing Harmony and Minimizing Hassle:

    Frank L. Smoll;Sean P. Cumming;Ronald E. Smith

  • Is Winning Everything? The Relative Contributions of Motivational Climate and Won-Lost Percentage in Youth Sports

    Sean P. Cumming;Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith;Joel R. Grossbard

  • Toward a Mediational Model of Coach-Player Relationships.

    Frank L. Smoll;Ronald E. Smith;Bill Curtis;Earl Hunt

  • Development and Validation of the Motivational Climate Scale for Youth Sports

    Ronald E. Smith;Sean P. Cumming;Frank L. Smoll

  • Behavioral assessment in youth sports: coaching behaviors and children's attitudes.

    Ronald E. Smith;Nolan W.s. Zane;Frank L. Smoll;David B. Coppel

  • Competitive anxiety in young athletes: Differentiating somatic anxiety, worry, and concentration disruption

    Joel R. Grossbard;Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Sean P. Cumming

  • Coaching the Coaches: Youth Sports as a Scientific and Applied Behavioral Setting

    Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll

  • Relations of Parent- and Coach-Initiated Motivational Climates to Young Athletes’ Self-Esteem, Performance Anxiety, and Autonomous Motivation: Who Is More Influential?

    Daniel J. O’Rourke;Ronald E. Smith;Frank L. Smoll;Sean P. Cumming

  • Children and youth in sport : a biopsychosocial perspective

    Frank L. Smoll;Ronald Edward Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald E. Smith
Ronald E. Smith University of Washington
Sean P. Cumming
Sean P. Cumming University of Bath
J. T. Ptacek
J. T. Ptacek Bucknell University
Nancy P. Barnett
Nancy P. Barnett Brown University
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Earl Hunt
Earl Hunt University of Washington
Robert M. Malina
Robert M. Malina The University of Texas at Austin
Yuichi Shoda
Yuichi Shoda University of Washington
Erin C. Dunn
Erin C. Dunn Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to psychology can open a range of career options in social work, counseling, and mental health services. As the demand for flexible education grows, many universities across the United States now offer high-quality online programs.

For those interested in social work, there are many choices such as the best online social work degrees in New Hampshire, which are known for their commitment to practical training and student support. In the Midwest, students can consider the top online social work programs in Ohio that provide a well-rounded curriculum and strong alumni networks.

Prospective students in the South may wish to explore the best online social work degrees in Texas, featuring diverse program options and affordable tuition. At the national level, comprehensive rankings like the top online social work degrees in America allow learners to compare programs based on reputation, flexibility, and career outcomes.

Earning an online degree in this field can lead to careers in clinical social work, school counseling, addiction services, and broader roles within psychology. The versatility of online learning makes it easier than ever to advance your education and enter meaningful professions that support mental health and wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Frank L. Smoll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles