World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
45539
World Ranking
3452
National Ranking
1940

Robert Glaser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Glaser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert Glaser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Glaser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Glaser was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic career encompassed various aspects of research within their fields of study, although specific areas of focus were not detailed in the available information.

There was no recorded list of recent papers or frequent publication venues attributed to Robert Glaser. Similarly, no frequent co-authors or book publications were identified in the source data.

Glaser's documented profile did not include specific awards or honors nor particular main topics or subfields of study linked to their research activities.

The scientific contributions and career details reflect a professional background tied to a reputable institution, with the available data indicating that Robert Glaser is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices

    Michelene T. H. Chi;Paul J. Feltovich;Robert Glaser

  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Miriam Bassok;Matthew W. Lewis;Peter Reimann

  • The Nature of Expertise

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Robert Glaser;Marshall J. Farr

  • Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment

    James W. Pellegrino;Naomi Chudowsky;Robert Glaser

  • Expertise in Problem Solving.

    Michelene T H Chi;Robert Glaser;Ernest Rees

  • Advances in Instructional Psychology

    Robert Glaser

  • Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge.

    Robert Glaser

  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems

    Unknown

  • Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures.

    Alan Lesgold;Harriet Rubinson;Paul Feltovich;Robert Glaser

  • Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions.

    Robert Glaser

  • Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction

    Robert Glaser;Miriam Bassok

  • Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom.

    Leona Schauble;Robert Glaser;Richard A. Duschl;Sharon Schulze

  • Thinking and learning skills

    Susan F. Chipman;Judith W. Segal;Robert Glaser

  • A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown

    Valerie J. Shute;Robert Glaser

  • Innovations in learning : new environments for education

    Leona Schauble;Robert Glaser

  • The Reemergence of Learning Theory within Instructional Research.

    Robert Glaser

  • Chapter 9: Assessment, Testing, and Instruction: Retrospect and Prospect:

    Robert Glaser;Edward Silver

  • The maturing of the relationship between the science of learning and cognition and educational practice

    Robert Glaser

  • Components of geometric analogy solution

    Timothy M. Mulholland;James W. Pellegrino;Robert Glaser

  • Investigating the Cognitive Complexity of Science Assessments

    Gail P. Baxter;Robert Glaser

  • Training research and education

    Robert Glaser

  • Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition

    Norman Frederiksen;Robert Glaser;Alan Lesgold;Michael G. Shafto

  • Cognitive psychology and instruction

    Ziva R. Peleg;Alan M. Lesgold;James W. Pellegrino;Sipke D. Fokkema

  • TEACHING MACHINES AND PROGRAMMED LEARNING, A SOURCE BOOK.

    Arthur A. Lumsdaine;Robert Glaser

  • Cognition and Instruction: Mind, Development, and Community

    Robert Glaser

  • Thinking and Learning Skills : Volume 2: Research and Open Questions

    S. F. Chipman;J. W. Segal;R. Glaser

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan M. Lesgold
Alan M. Lesgold University of Pittsburgh
Michelene T. H. Chi
Michelene T. H. Chi Arizona State University
Leona Schauble
Leona Schauble Vanderbilt University
Paul J. Feltovich
Paul J. Feltovich Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Lauren B. Resnick
Lauren B. Resnick University of Pittsburgh
Valerie J. Shute
Valerie J. Shute Florida State University
Andrew C. Porter
Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania
James G. Greeno
James G. Greeno University of Pittsburgh
Richard C. Anderson
Richard C. Anderson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard A. Duschl
Richard A. Duschl Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a degree in psychology, it’s important to explore the variety of online degrees and professional pathways available. Many students pursue online master’s programs in areas such as counseling, clinical psychology, or marriage and family therapy (MFT). These flexible programs offer a convenient way to balance studies with work or personal commitments.

Becoming an MFT is a popular career path for psychology graduates. However, requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, if you’re interested in mft requirements in New York City, you’ll find specific licensing criteria you must meet. Similarly, those looking at mft requirements in Newark, mft requirements in Norfolk, or mft requirements in North Las Vegas must check their local regulations regarding necessary coursework, supervised hours, and examinations.

Whether you choose to become a therapist, counselor, or pursue another psychology-related role, online education can provide a strong foundation. Always ensure your chosen program is accredited and will satisfy the requirements for your intended career path and location.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Glaser

Recently Published Articles