World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
58341
World Ranking
2215
National Ranking
1288

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2016 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2015 - E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Statistics

His primary scientific interests are in Cognitive psychology, Cognitive science, Social psychology, Comprehension and Conceptual change. His work on Self explanation as part of general Cognitive psychology research is often related to Mental model, thus linking different fields of science. His research investigates the connection between Cognitive science and topics such as Cognitive development that intersect with problems in Childhood development, Child development and Control.

His study looks at the intersection of Social psychology and topics like Active learning with Note-taking. He interconnects Variation, Categorization, Artificial intelligence, Mathematics education and Knowledge building in the investigation of issues within Comprehension. His Categorization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Matching, Perception and Literal.

His most cited work include:

  • Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices (4193 citations)
  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems (2233 citations)
  • The Nature of Expertise (2070 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Mathematics education, Cognitive psychology, Cognitive science, Pedagogy and Social psychology. Collaborative learning is closely connected to Context in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Mathematics education. His Cognitive psychology research includes elements of Conceptual change and Reading.

His study on Cognitive science also encompasses disciplines like

  • Cognitive development which connect with Child development and Knowledge base,
  • Knowledge level that connect with fields like Descriptive knowledge. His Self explanation research integrates issues from Concept learning, Cognitive style and Comprehension. His Representation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Developmental psychology and Categorization.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematics education (27.64%)
  • Cognitive psychology (21.95%)
  • Cognitive science (12.20%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2021)?

  • Mathematics education (27.64%)
  • Constructive (9.76%)
  • Cognitive psychology (21.95%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Mathematics education, Constructive, Cognitive psychology, Active learning and Pedagogy are his primary areas of study. His Mathematics education study deals with Context intersecting with Generative grammar and Educational measurement. His Self explanation study, which is part of a larger body of work in Cognitive psychology, is frequently linked to Mental model and Structure, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His work in Self explanation addresses issues such as Semantic similarity, which are connected to fields such as Formative assessment and Comprehension. His Comprehension research integrates issues from Mental calculation and Artificial intelligence. His Active learning research incorporates elements of Social psychology, Flexibility, Learning theory, Experiential learning and Collaborative learning.

Between 2008 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The Nature of Expertise (2070 citations)
  • Active‐Constructive‐Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities (749 citations)
  • The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes (572 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Statistics

His primary areas of investigation include Cognitive psychology, Active learning, Experiential learning, Constructive and Mathematics education. His research in Cognitive psychology intersects with topics in Conceptual change and Communication. His work on Learning sciences as part of general Experiential learning research is frequently linked to Domain, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His research integrates issues of Mental calculation and Artificial intelligence in his study of Mathematics education. His work in Self explanation covers topics such as Test which are related to areas like Concept learning. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Attribution, Comprehension, Teaching method, Cognitive science and Schema.

Best Publications

  • Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices

    Michelene T. H. Chi;Paul J. Feltovich;Robert Glaser

  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Miriam Bassok;Matthew W. Lewis;Peter Reimann

  • The Nature of Expertise

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Robert Glaser;Marshall J. Farr

  • Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Nicholas De Leeuw;Mei Hung Chiu;Christian Lavancher

  • The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.

    Michelene T. H. Chi;Ruth Wylie

  • Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide

    Michelene T.H. Chi

  • Expertise in Problem Solving.

    Michelene T H Chi;Robert Glaser;Ernest Rees

  • Active‐Constructive‐Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities

    Michelene T. H. Chi

  • From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts

    Michelene T.H. Chi;James D. Slotta;Nicholas De Leeuw

  • Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems

    Unknown

  • Learning from human tutoring

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Stephanie A. Siler;Heisawn Jeong;Takashi Yamauchi

  • Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust.

    Michelene T. H. Chi

  • Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics

    Michelene T. H. Chi

  • Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift

    Michelene T. H. Chi

  • Knowledge structures and memory development.

    Michelene T. H. Chi

  • Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions:

    Rod D. Roscoe;Michelene T. H. Chi

  • Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge

    Michelene T. H. Chi;Randi Daimon Koeske

  • THE PROCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF CONCEPTUAL CHANGE

    Michelene T. H. Chi;Rod D. Roscoe

  • Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science

    M. T. H. Chi

  • Content knowledge: its role, representation, and restructuring in memory development.

    Michelene T.H. Chi;Stephen J. Ceci

  • Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9.

    Michelene T. H. Chi

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Glaser
Robert Glaser University of Pittsburgh
Tania Lombrozo
Tania Lombrozo Princeton University
Robert Kail
Robert Kail Purdue University West Lafayette
Stephen J. Ceci
Stephen J. Ceci Cornell University
Stellan Ohlsson
Stellan Ohlsson University of Illinois at Chicago
David Klahr
David Klahr Carnegie Mellon University
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh
James G. Greeno
James G. Greeno University of Pittsburgh
Cristine H. Legare
Cristine H. Legare The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a range of fulfilling online career paths, including roles in counseling, therapy, and social services. One increasingly popular path is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role in high demand across the United States.

Certification and licensure requirements for substance abuse counselors can vary widely by state and even by city. For instance, Lubbock substance abuse counselor certification requirements detail specific educational and supervised experience needs. Similarly, understanding Madison substance abuse counselor certification requirements is crucial for those planning to work in Wisconsin.

If you are considering work in Tennessee, be sure to review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Memphis. Meanwhile, those drawn to Arizona should check out the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Mesa.

By researching local requirements, psychology graduates can identify the best fit for online degrees and pursue a rewarding path in counseling or mental health advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Michelene T. H. Chi

Trending Scientists