What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Management
K. Anders Ericsson mainly focuses on Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Social psychology, Experience level and Knowledge management.
K. Anders Ericsson conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Cognitive psychology and Structure through his works.
His Cognition study combines topics in areas such as Context, Empirical research and Task.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in nobody and Order.
His studies in Knowledge management integrate themes in fields like Traditional education, Perception and Mastery learning.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Nonverbal communication, focusing on Speech communication and, on occasion, Short-term memory.
His most cited work include:
- The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. (5895 citations)
- Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (5312 citations)
- Verbal reports as data. (3557 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Social psychology, Task and Dreyfus model of skill acquisition.
In general Cognitive psychology study, his work on Recall often relates to the realm of Structure, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His studies examine the connections between Cognition and genetics, as well as such issues in Protocol analysis, with regards to Artificial intelligence.
His Social psychology study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Context.
Dreyfus model of skill acquisition is integrated with Applied psychology and Control in his study.
His work carried out in the field of Working memory brings together such families of science as Human–computer interaction, Long-term memory, Encoding and Comprehension.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (40.00%)
- Cognition (26.11%)
- Social psychology (15.00%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Cognitive psychology (40.00%)
- Cognition (26.11%)
- Knowledge management (8.89%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Knowledge management, Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and Medical education are his primary areas of study.
His work on Recall is typically connected to Contrast as part of general Cognitive psychology study, connecting several disciplines of science.
Cognition is frequently linked to Protocol analysis in his study.
His Knowledge management study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Expert system and Agency.
His Medical education research includes elements of Academic achievement, Traditional education and Emergency medicine.
His research integrates issues of Index and Duration in his study of Social psychology.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (1771 citations)
- Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. (238 citations)
- Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise (127 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Management
K. Anders Ericsson spends much of his time researching Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Experience level, Knowledge management and Medical education.
His study in the field of Similarity is also linked to topics like Heuristics.
K. Anders Ericsson has included themes like Control, Stress and Conscious control in his Cognition study.
You can notice a mix of various disciplines of study, such as Measure, Structure, Plan and Perspective, in his Knowledge management studies.
His work in the fields of Training overlaps with other areas such as Learning opportunities, Core and Video recording.
His Expert system research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Knowledge level, Sociological imagination and Library science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
