World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
87
Citations
102026
World Ranking
1055
National Ranking
649

K. Anders Ericsson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Anders Ericsson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 205 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

K. Anders Ericsson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Anders Ericsson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

K. Anders Ericsson was affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spanned the fields of psychology and medicine, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, family practice, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as public health, environmental and occupational health.

The scientist's recent publications highlighted a variety of topics related to education, cognitive processes, and medical training. These papers included:

  • Given that the detailed original criteria for deliberate practice have not changed, could the understanding of this complex concept have improved over time? A response to Macnamara and Hambrick (2020), published in Psychological Research.
  • A think-aloud study to inform the design of radiograph interpretation practice (2020), published in Advances in Health Sciences Education.
  • Applying aspects of deliberate practice to help low performers improve manual control in a complex task (2022), published in Acta Psychologica.

The research topics covered in these works involved educational and psychological assessments, innovative teaching and learning methods, neuroscience, education and cognitive function, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, radiology practices and education, innovations in medical education, and visual and cognitive learning processes.

K. Anders Ericsson frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including Jong-Sung Yoon, Kathy Boutis, Martin Pecaric, Nancy R. Fefferman, and Martin Pusic.

Publications appeared in notable venues such as Psychological Research, Advances in Health Sciences Education, and Acta Psychologica, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their work across psychology and medical education.

Among professional recognitions, K. Anders Ericsson was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Verbal reports as data.

    K. Anders Ericsson;Herbert A. Simon

  • Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data

    K. Anders Ericsson;Herbert Alexander Simon

  • The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.

    K. Anders Ericsson;Ralf T. Krampe;Clemens Tesch-Römer

  • Long-term working memory

    K A Ericsson;W Kintsch

  • Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition.

    K. Anders Ericsson;Neil Charness

  • Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

    K Anders Ericsson

  • The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance

    K. Anders Ericsson;Neil Charness;Paul J. Feltovich;Robert R. Hoffman

  • The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance

    K. Anders Ericsson

  • Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits

    K. Anders Ericsson;Jacqui Smith

  • Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview.

    K. Anders Ericsson

  • EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints

    Unknown

  • The Road To Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games

    K. Anders Ericsson

  • The Acquisition of Expert Performance: An Introduction to Some of the Issues

    K. Anders Ericsson

  • The making of an expert.

    K. Anders Ericsson;Michael J. Prietula;Edward T. Cokely

  • Acquisition of a memory skill

    K. Anders Ericsson;William G. Chase;Steve Faloon

  • Skill and Working Memory

    William G. Chase;K. Anders Ericsson

  • How to Study Thinking in Everyday Life: Contrasting Think-Aloud Protocols With Descriptions and Explanations of Thinking

    K. Anders Ericsson;Herbert A. Simon

  • Deliberate Practice Spells Success: Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee

    Angela Lee Duckworth;Teri A. Kirby;Eli Tsukayama;Heather Berstein

  • Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives

    Paul J. Feltovich;Michael J. Prietula;K. Anders Ericsson

  • Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise

    K. Anders Ericsson;Robert Pool

  • Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks

    K. Anders Ericsson

  • Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: some considerations when applying the expert performance approach.

    A. Mark Williams;A. Mark Williams;K. Anders Ericsson

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Mark Williams
A. Mark Williams University of Utah
Paul Ward
Paul Ward Torrens University Australia
David W. Eccles
David W. Eccles Florida State University
Herbert A. Simon
Herbert A. Simon Carnegie Mellon University
Neil Charness
Neil Charness Florida State University
Alice F. Healy
Alice F. Healy University of Colorado Boulder
Edward T. Cokely
Edward T. Cokely University of Oklahoma
Lyle E. Bourne
Lyle E. Bourne University of Colorado Boulder
Ralf Krampe
Ralf Krampe KU Leuven
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can lead to numerous career pathways, particularly in mental health counseling. Many students opt for online psychology degrees, which can offer flexibility and accessibility. These degrees provide a strong foundation for roles such as mental health counselors, school psychologists, or behavioral specialists.

It's important to understand the different mental health counselor requirements in Aurora as licensure criteria can vary by state and even by city. For example, aspiring professionals can learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Austin, where requirements may include specific coursework, supervised practice, and passing state exams.

Similarly, research the mental health counselor requirements in Bakersfield if you intend to practice in California. In Maryland, you’ll want to be aware of the mental health counselor requirements in Baltimore for local licensure. By understanding these variations, you can better plan your education, practicum experiences, and licensure preparation as you pursue your psychology career online.

Best Scientists Citing K. Anders Ericsson

Recently Published Articles