World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 98 669 34 401 54005

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2017. 29 of the 547 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2017. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

547 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 6
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 10
2002 11
2003 7
2004 13
2005 15
2006 14
2007 12
2008 17
2009 16
2010 24
2011 24
2012 24
2013 26
2014 34
2015 24
2016 25
2017 42
2018 23
2019 33
2020 24
2021 34
2022 16
2023 17
2024 27
2025 2
Total 547
Download as CSV

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 401 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 401
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53 98
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer was affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spanned multiple interconnected fields, with a strong focus on medicine, social sciences, and psychology. The scientist produced a notable body of work contributing to the understanding and advancement of education and cognitive processes within medical and educational contexts.

Their research prominently addressed the following main fields of study:

  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these domains, van Merriënboer explored various subfields, including:

  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Family Practice

The scientist's work covered several distinct and overlapping topics, such as:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Van Merriënboer published research extensively in the following venues:

  • BMC Medical Education
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Research Square
  • Academic Medicine
  • Educational Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work included:

  • Jeroen Donkers
  • Karen D. Könings
  • A.J.W. Beulens
  • Willem M. Brinkman
  • Evert L. Koldewijn

Among recent papers, some key publications were:

  • Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks (2020), published in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • From Theory to Practice: The Application of Cognitive Load Theory to the Practice of Medicine (2020), published in Academic Medicine
  • Understanding context specificity: the effect of contextual factors on clinical reasoning (2020), published in Diagnosis
  • International Online Collaboration Competencies in Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review (2021), published in Journal of Studies in International Education

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer was recognized as a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design

    John Sweller;Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer;Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer;Fred G. W. C. Paas

  • Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;John Sweller

  • Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach

    Fred G. W. C. Paas;Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer

  • Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later

    John Sweller;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies

    Jeroen J G van Merriënboer;Jeroen J G van Merriënboer;John Sweller

  • Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Paul Arthur Kirschner

  • Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

  • Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning.

    Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer;Paul A. Kirschner;Liesbeth Kester

  • The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures

    Fred G. W. C. Paas;Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer

  • Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks

    Fred G. W. C. Paas;Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer

  • Blueprints for Complex Learning: The 4C/ID-Model

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Richard E. Clark;Marcel B. M. de Croock

  • Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load

    Jimmie Leppink;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Cees P. M. Van der Vleuten;Tamara Van Gog

  • Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research.

    Fred G. W. C. Paas;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Jos J. Adam

  • Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education

    Paul A. Kirschner;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86

    John Q. Young;Jeroen Van Merrienboer;Steve Durning;Olle Ten Cate

  • Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

    Marjo van Zundert;Dominique Sluijsmans;Jeroen van Merriënboer

  • Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing.

    Huib K. Tabbers;Rob L. Martens;Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer

  • Research on Cognitive Load Theory and Its Design Implications for E-Learning.

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Paul Ayres

  • A Motivational Perspective on the Relation Between Mental Effort and Performance: Optimizing Learner Involvement in Instruction

    Fred Paas;Juhani Ensio Tuovinen;Jeroen J.G. van Merrienboer;A. Aubeteen Darabi

  • Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load

    Jimmie Leppink;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Tamara van Gog;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Anique B. H. de Bruin
Anique B. H. de Bruin Maastricht University
Liesbeth Kester
Liesbeth Kester Utrecht University
Diana H. J. M. Dolmans
Diana H. J. M. Dolmans Maastricht University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Arno M. M. Muijtjens
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Maastricht University
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of rewarding online degree options and career pathways. Many students pursue careers in behavioral health and therapy, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Obtaining BCBA certification can be highly rewarding, but it’s important to understand the specific requirements which may differ between locations.

For instance, if you're interested in bcba certification requirements in Scottsdale, you’ll need to meet certain education and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, those looking into Seattle bcba education requirements will find that accredited online degrees, along with fieldwork, play a key role in meeting licensure standards.

Additionally, guidance on how to become a bcba in Spokane and St. Louis bcba education requirements can help clarify the steps needed, from selecting the right online degree to preparing for the required certification exam. Exploring these region-specific requirements will help you make informed choices and start your path to a meaningful career in psychology and behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

Recently Published Articles