World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Netherlands
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 119 268 231 7 7 593 48531
Neuroscience 122 366 328 6 6 615 53683

Jelle Jolles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jelle Jolles between 1978 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jelle Jolles published across 45 years, from 1978 to 2022, averaging 16.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2012. 1 of the 726 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2012. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 22 publications 1993: 22 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 26 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 36 publications 2003: 34 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 55 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1978 2022

726 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jelle Jolles: publications per year, 1978 to 2022
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 3
1982 4
1983 1
1984 1
1985 5
1986 3
1987 5
1988 1
1989 2
1990 12
1991 8
1992 22
1993 22
1994 11
1995 17
1996 12
1997 6
1998 19
1999 11
2000 26
2001 17
2002 36
2003 34
2004 19
2005 33
2006 34
2007 43
2008 21
2009 34
2010 37
2011 43
2012 55
2013 49
2014 16
2015 19
2016 18
2017 10
2018 6
2019 3
2020 2
2021 0
2022 1
Total 726
Download as CSV

Jelle Jolles publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelle Jolles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 591–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 593 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14 593
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jelle Jolles D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelle Jolles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22 119
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Jelle Jolles is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology with a focus on developmental and educational psychology. Their research spans several subfields including education, cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, and applied psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work encompass educational and psychological assessments, neuroscience, education and cognitive function, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, motivation and self-concept in sports, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Jolles has contributed to a number of publications, with recent papers including:

  • On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Sex differences in self-regulation in early, middle and late adolescence: A large-scale cross-sectional study, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • School Achievement in Early Adolescence Is Associated With Students' Self-Perceived Executive Functions, 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Over aspecten van het executief functioneren die niet meetbaar zijn met formele tests, 2020, Kind en adolescent

The frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Jolles include Dietsje Jolles, Marleen A. J. van Tetering, A.M. van der Laan, C.H. de Kogel, and Renate H. M. de Groot.

In terms of dissemination, Jolles most commonly publishes in venues such as Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, and Kind en adolescent. Among those, Frontiers in Psychology stands out as a primary platform with multiple contributions.

Best Publications

  • Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study

    JT Moller;Pjm Pierre Cluitmans;LS Rasmussen;PJ Houx

  • Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study

    F-E de Leeuw;J C de Groot;E Achten;M Oudkerk

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank‐Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial.

    Jane Durga;Martin P J van Boxtel;Evert G Schouten;Frans J Kok

  • Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients

    LS Rasmussen;T Johnson;HM Harrie Kuipers;D Kristensen

  • Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory

    Niels D. Prins;Ewoud J. van Dijk;Tom den Heijer;Sarah E. Vermeer

  • Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers

    Sanne Dekker;Nikki C. Lee;Paul Howard-Jones;Jelle Jolles

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: The Rotterdam scan study

    Unknown

  • The Stroop Color-Word Test: Influence of Age, Sex, and Education; and Normative Data for a Large Sample Across the Adult Age Range

    Wim Van der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation.

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive and academic performance in children and adolescents: a novel combination of a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel

    Amika S. Singh;Amika S. Singh;Emi Saliasi;Emi Saliasi;Vera Van Den Berg;Vera Van Den Berg;Léonie Uijtdewilligen

  • The nature of the effect of female gonadal hormone replacement therapy on cognitive function in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis

    E. Hogervorst;J. Williams;M. Budge;W. Riedel

  • Periventricular cerebral white matter lesions predict rate of cognitive decline

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry.

    Danielle J. Tisserand;Jens C. Pruessner;Ernesto J. Sanz Arigita;Martin P.J. van Boxtel

  • Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly

    J Canet;J Raeder;LS Rasmussen;M Enlund

  • Deficits of memory, executive functioning and attention following infarction in the thalamus; a study of 22 cases with localised lesions

    Ysbrand D. Van der Werf;Philip Scheltens;Jaap Lindeboom;Menno P. Witter

  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy predicts Alzheimer's disease in patients with minor cognitive impairment

    P J Visser;F R J Verhey;P A M Hofman;P Scheltens

  • Cognitive functioning in healthy older adults aged 64-81: a cohort study into the effects of age, sex, and education.

    S.A.H. van Hooren;A.M. Valentijn;H. Bosma;R.W.H.M. Ponds

  • Neuropsychology of infarctions in the thalamus: a review.

    Y.D. van der Werf;M.P. Witter;H.B.M. Uylings;J. Jolles

  • Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non-psychotic relatives

    I. Janssen;L. Krabbendam;J. Jolles;Jim Van Os

  • Change in Sensory Functioning Predicts Change in Cognitive Functioning: Results from a 6‐Year Follow‐Up in the Maastricht Aging Study

    Susanne A. M. Valentijn;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Susan A. H. Van Hooren;Hans Bosma

  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory dysfunction as predictors for dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment

    Pieter Jelle Visser;Philip Scheltens;Frans R.J. Verhey;Ben Schmand

  • The Letter Digit Substitution Test: Normative Data for 1,858 Healthy Participants Aged 24–81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): Influence of Age, Education, and Sex

    Wim van der Elst;Martin P.J. van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Normative data for the Animal, Profession and Letter M Naming verbal fluency tests for Dutch speaking participants and the effects of age, education, and sex

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P.J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • The neuropsychology of schizophrenia

    L. Krabbendam;J. Jolles

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin P.J. van Boxtel
Martin P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
M.P.J. van Boxtel
M.P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Lydia Krabbendam
Lydia Krabbendam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harry B.M. Uylings
Harry B.M. Uylings Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds Maastricht University
Frans J. M. Feron
Frans J. M. Feron Maastricht University
Johan S.H. Vles
Johan S.H. Vles Maastricht University
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers a range of study options and specializations, many of which can be accessed online. Finding the right program is crucial, especially if affordability is a key concern. Students interested in graduate-level training can consider affordable online masters psychology programs, which deliver excellent value while preparing graduates for clinical, research, or counseling roles.

Those aiming to work with children in educational settings might opt for affordable online school psychology degree programs, which balance rigorous training with budget-friendly tuition rates. Broader social science interests can be met through cheapest online sociology degrees, supporting diverse career paths in social work, research, or public service.

When considering where to study, it’s helpful to review the best value colleges for psychology degrees online. Comparing tuition, accreditation, and flexibility ensures you find a reputable program that fits your budget and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jelle Jolles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles