World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin P.J. van Boxtel

Martin P.J. van Boxtel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1642 1472 94 89 255 23907

Martin P.J. van Boxtel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin P.J. van Boxtel between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin P.J. van Boxtel published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2023. 20 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2023. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 6 publications
1994 2025

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin P.J. van Boxtel: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 2
1998 4
1999 1
2000 7
2001 2
2002 7
2003 3
2004 3
2005 8
2006 11
2007 14
2008 10
2009 15
2010 11
2011 16
2012 14
2013 8
2014 10
2015 13
2016 9
2017 21
2018 9
2019 18
2020 13
2021 12
2022 11
2023 31
2024 14
2025 6
Total 308
Download as CSV

Martin P.J. van Boxtel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin P.J. van Boxtel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 255 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 255
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin P.J. van Boxtel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin P.J. van Boxtel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Internal medicine
  • Disease

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cognition, Gerontology, Cognitive decline, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Developmental psychology. His studies in Cognition integrate themes in fields like Psychometrics and Clinical psychology. His Gerontology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Neurocognitive, Verbal memory, Prospective cohort study and Confidence interval.

His Cognitive decline study is concerned with the larger field of Dementia. His work in Dementia addresses subjects such as Psychiatry, which are connected to disciplines such as Disease, Age of onset, Alzheimer's disease and Set. While the research belongs to areas of Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, Martin P.J. van Boxtel spends his time largely on the problem of Verbal fluency test, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Polyunsaturated fatty acid, Biochemistry, Endocrinology and Unsaturated fatty acid.

His most cited work include:

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (956 citations)
  • Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial. (569 citations)
  • Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. (483 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Cognition, Cognitive decline, Gerontology, Dementia and Internal medicine. His Cognition research integrates issues from Developmental psychology and Clinical psychology. His work deals with themes such as Randomized controlled trial, Cognitive therapy and Anxiety, which intersect with Clinical psychology.

His work in Cognitive decline covers topics such as Cohort study which are related to areas like Demography. His Gerontology research integrates issues from Prospective cohort study, Public health and Cognitive aging. His Dementia research includes themes of Psychological intervention, Psychiatry, Depression, Epidemiology and Risk factor.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cognition (43.46%)
  • Cognitive decline (30.80%)
  • Gerontology (27.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Dementia (26.16%)
  • Cognitive decline (30.80%)
  • Cohort study (11.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Martin P.J. van Boxtel mainly investigates Dementia, Cognitive decline, Cohort study, Cognition and Internal medicine. Martin P.J. van Boxtel has researched Dementia in several fields, including Gerontology and Public health. Martin P.J. van Boxtel works mostly in the field of Cognitive decline, limiting it down to topics relating to Ageing and, in certain cases, COSMIC cancer database, Grey matter, Hippocampal formation and Hippocampus, as a part of the same area of interest.

His studies deal with areas such as Clinical psychology and Risk factor as well as Cognition. Martin P.J. van Boxtel combines subjects such as Intervention, Neuropsychology and Anxiety with his study of Clinical psychology. His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of White matter, Diffusion MRI, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Cardiology.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Investigation of antihypertensive class, dementia, and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis (36 citations)
  • Determinants of cognitive performance and decline in 20 diverse ethno-regional groups: A COSMIC collaboration cohort study. (24 citations)
  • Modifiable Risk Factors Explain Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dementia Risk: Evidence from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. (18 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cognition
  • Disease

Martin P.J. van Boxtel focuses on Dementia, Cohort study, Cognition, Cognitive decline and Internal medicine. The Dementia study combines topics in areas such as Occupational safety and health and Gerontology. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as PsycINFO and Cognition.

His research investigates the link between Cognitive decline and topics such as Verbal memory that cross with problems in Cognitive skill, Cognitive flexibility, Neuropsychology, Anxiety and Verbal fluency test. His Internal medicine study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Cardiology. His Risk factor study combines topics in areas such as Demography and Clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial.

    Jane Durga;Martin P J van Boxtel;Evert G Schouten;Frans J Kok

  • The Stroop Color-Word Test: Influence of Age, Sex, and Education; and Normative Data for a Large Sample Across the Adult Age Range

    Wim Van der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation.

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies

    Kay Deckers;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Olga J. G. Schiepers;Marjolein de Vugt

  • Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment : a systematic review

    Jennifer Reijnders;Caroline van Heugten;Caroline van Heugten;Martin van Boxtel;Martin van Boxtel

  • Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry.

    Danielle J. Tisserand;Jens C. Pruessner;Ernesto J. Sanz Arigita;Martin P.J. van Boxtel

  • Change in Sensory Functioning Predicts Change in Cognitive Functioning: Results from a 6‐Year Follow‐Up in the Maastricht Aging Study

    Susanne A. M. Valentijn;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Susan A. H. Van Hooren;Hans Bosma

  • The Letter Digit Substitution Test: Normative Data for 1,858 Healthy Participants Aged 24–81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): Influence of Age, Education, and Sex

    Wim van der Elst;Martin P.J. van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Normative data for the Animal, Profession and Letter M Naming verbal fluency tests for Dutch speaking participants and the effects of age, education, and sex

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P.J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption in Relation to Cognitive Performance in Middle Age

    Sandra Kalmijn;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Monique W. M. Verschuren;Jelle Jolles

  • A Voxel-based Morphometric Study to Determine Individual Differences in Gray Matter Density Associated with Age and Cognitive Change Over Time

    Danielle J. Tisserand;Martin P.J. van Boxtel;Jens C. Pruessner;Paul Hofman

  • Job-Worker Mismatch and Cognitive Decline

    Andries de Grip;Hans Bosma;Dick Willems;Martin van Boxtel

  • n−3 Fatty acid proportions in plasma and cognitive performance in older adults

    Carla Dullemeijer;Jane Durga;Ingeborg A. Brouwer;Ondine Van De Rest

  • The Relation Between Morbidity and Cognitive Performance in a Normal Aging Population

    Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Frank Buntinx;Peter J. Houx;Job F. M. Metsemakers

  • A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?

    Alieske E.H. Dam;Marjolein E. de Vugt;Inge P.M. Klinkenberg;Frans R.J. Verhey

  • Effects of Computer Training and Internet Usage on the Well-Being and Quality of Life of Older Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Study

    Karin Slegers;Martin P J van Boxtel;Jelle Jolles

  • Tryptophan depletion impairs memory consolidation but improves focussed attention in healthy young volunteers.

    J. A. J. Schmitt;B. L. Jorissen;S. Sobczak;M. P. J. Van Boxtel

  • Coronary heart disease and risk for cognitive impairment or dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kay Deckers;Syenna H. J. Schievink;Maria M. F. Rodriquez;Robert J. van Oostenbrugge

  • Fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive decline in middle-aged men and women: the Doetinchem Cohort Study

    Astrid C. J. Nooyens;H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Boukje M. van Gelder

  • Aerobic capacity and cognitive performance in a cross-sectional aging study

    Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Fred G. W. C. Paas;Peter J. Houx;Jos J. Adam

Frequent Co-Authors

Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Jacobus F.A. Jansen
Jacobus F.A. Jansen Maastricht University
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Nicolaas C. Schaper Maastricht University
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds Maastricht University
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Marjolein E. de Vugt
Marjolein E. de Vugt Maastricht University
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, you may also want to explore online social work degrees. These programs can offer a flexible and affordable path toward a rewarding career in helping others, especially if you’re seeking to combine psychological knowledge with real-world practice.

Finding programs that fit your budget is essential. Some of the affordable online social work programs in Tennessee provide students with accessible options, while you’ll discover most affordable social work degree programs in Arkansas that focus on core social welfare skills.

For those in urban areas or looking for city-based networking, the most affordable social work degree programs in Atlanta are worth considering. Similarly, students interested in the Southwest can check out affordable social work degrees in Arizona.

These related degrees can lead to careers in mental health, community outreach, and counseling—expanding your professional options and impact beyond traditional psychology roles.

Best Scientists Citing Martin P.J. van Boxtel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles