World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 108 429 377 21 21 635 40322

Kaarin J. Anstey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kaarin J. Anstey between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kaarin J. Anstey published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 25 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2021. 42 of the 849 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2021. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 51 publications 2017: 51 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 57 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 49 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 39 publications 2026: 3 publications
1993 2026

849 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kaarin J. Anstey: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 3
1995 4
1996 3
1997 5
1998 0
1999 8
2000 2
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 14
2005 12
2006 33
2007 21
2008 24
2009 36
2010 27
2011 36
2012 37
2013 37
2014 39
2015 45
2016 51
2017 51
2018 36
2019 36
2020 41
2021 57
2022 38
2023 49
2024 43
2025 39
2026 3
Total 849
Download as CSV

Kaarin J. Anstey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kaarin J. Anstey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 631–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 635 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7 635
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kaarin J. Anstey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kaarin J. Anstey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24 108
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science
  • 2019 - Australian Laureate Fellow

Overview

Kaarin J. Anstey is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on psychiatry and mental health, public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, and physiology.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Frailty in Older Adults

They have co-authored research with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Ruth Peters
  • Perminder S. Sachdev
  • Ranmalee Eramudugolla
  • Nicolas Cherbuin
  • Nicola T. Lautenschlager

Common venues for their publications include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
  • BMJ Open

Recent papers authored or co-authored by them feature topics related to cognitive decline, dementia risk factors, and sex differences in cognitive resilience. Notable papers include:

  • "Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: WHO Recommendations," 2022, published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study," 2020, published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • "Association Between Blood Pressure Variability With Dementia and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2021, published in Hypertension
  • "Sex and gender differences in cognitive resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease," 2024, published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Association of sex differences in dementia risk factors with sex differences in memory decline in a population-based cohort spanning 20-76 years," 2021, published in Scientific Reports

Throughout their career, Anstey has been recognized with awards such as:

  • Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science (2021)
  • Australian Laureate Fellow (2019)

Best Publications

  • Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Joanne M. Wood;Stephen Lord;Janine G. Walker

  • Smoking as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Cognitive Decline: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

    Kaarin Anstey;Chwee Chwee Von Sanden;Agus Salim;Richard O'Kearney

  • Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women

    Stephen R. Lord;John A. Ward;Philippa Williams;Kaarin J. Anstey

  • Body mass index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

    Kaarin Anstey;Nicolas Cherbuin;Marc Budge;Jennifer Young

  • Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis

    Linda Lang;Angela Clifford;Li Wei;Dongmei Zhang

  • Cholesterol as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline: a systematic review of prospective studies with meta-analysis.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Darren M. Lipnicki;Lee-Fay Low

  • Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline: meta-analysis of prospective studies.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Holly A. Mack;Nicolas Cherbuin

  • An epidemiological study of falls in older community-dwelling women : the Randwick Falls and Fractures Study

    Stephen R. Lord;John A. Ward;Philippa Williams;Kaarin J. Anstey

  • Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies

    Kay Deckers;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Olga J. G. Schiepers;Marjolein de Vugt

  • Education, activity, health, blood pressure and apolipoprotein E as predictors of cognitive change in old age: a review.

    Kaarin Anstey;Helen Christensen

  • Air Pollution and Dementia: A Systematic Review

    Ruth Peters;Ruth Peters;Nicole Ee;Jean Peters;Andrew Booth

  • Exposure to air pollution and cognitive functioning across the life course--A systematic literature review.

    Angela Clifford;Linda Lang;Ruoling Chen;Kaarin J. Anstey

  • Updating the Evidence on the Association between Serum Cholesterol and Risk of Late-Life Dementia: Review and Meta-Analysis

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Kimberly Ashby-Mitchell;Ruth Peters

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Testing the invariance of a uni-dimensional resilience measure that is independent of positive and negative affect

    Richard Burns;Kaarin Anstey

  • Western diet is associated with a smaller hippocampus: a longitudinal investigation.

    Felice N. Jacka;Nicolas Cherbuin;Kaarin J. Anstey;Perminder Sachdev

  • The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Diverse Geographical and Ethnocultural Regions: The COSMIC Collaboration

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Darren M. Lipnicki;Nicole A. Kochan;John D. Crawford

  • Volunteering and Psychological Well-Being Among Young-Old Adults: How Much Is Too Much?

    Timothy D. Windsor;Kaarin J. Anstey;Bryan Rodgers

  • A Population-Based Study of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Associated Impairment in Middle-Aged Adults

    Debjani Das;Nicolas Cherbuin;Peter Butterworth;Kaarin J. Anstey

  • Retirement and mental health: analysis of the Australian national survey of mental health and well-being.

    Peter Butterworth;Sarah C. Gill;Bryan Rodgers;Kaarin J. Anstey

Frequent Co-Authors

Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Peter Butterworth
Peter Butterworth Australian National University
Mary A. Luszcz
Mary A. Luszcz Flinders University
Ruth Peters
Ruth Peters Imperial College London
Tim D. Windsor
Tim D. Windsor Flinders University
Simon Easteal
Simon Easteal Australian National University
Joanne M. Wood
Joanne M. Wood Queensland University of Technology
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Wei Wen
Wei Wen University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a wide range of online programs and career pathways, especially if you're interested in roles such as school counseling. Many states have unique requirements for becoming a school counselor, making it important to understand the educational and certification processes for your chosen location.

For instance, the requirements to be a school counselor in North Carolina include a specific graduate degree and completion of a state-approved preparation program. Meanwhile, North Dakota school counselor education requirements emphasize both coursework in counseling and sometimes experience in education.

If you are considering Ohio, be sure to review the Ohio school counselor certification requirements, which involve graduate study and passing relevant exams. Similarly, the Oklahoma school counselor certification requirements focus on academic credentials and state licensure exams.

No matter where you choose to study or work, an online psychology degree can provide a flexible path toward meeting these diverse state standards and opening doors to meaningful careers in mental health and education.

Best Scientists Citing Kaarin J. Anstey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles