World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3742 3452 199 193 210 11038

Mary A. Luszcz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary A. Luszcz between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary A. Luszcz published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 4 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1972 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary A. Luszcz: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 2
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 3
1983 3
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 9
2000 6
2001 4
2002 7
2003 6
2004 3
2005 2
2006 6
2007 11
2008 6
2009 16
2010 15
2011 14
2012 14
2013 12
2014 9
2015 15
2016 6
2017 4
2018 5
2019 4
2020 2
2021 3
2022 4
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 232
Download as CSV

Mary A. Luszcz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Luszcz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 210
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary A. Luszcz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Luszcz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary A. Luszcz is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and conducts research primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including social psychology, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, clinical psychology, health, and applied psychology.

The main themes of Luszcz's research focus on psychological well-being and life satisfaction, aging and gerontology research, and health disparities and outcomes. Additional topics include optimism, hope, and well-being, motivation and self-concept in sports, perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety studies, as well as stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Recent publications by Luszcz include:

  • "Older Adults' Views on Characteristics of Groups to Support Engagement," 2023, Activities Adaptation & Aging
  • "Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a personalised intervention for carers of people requiring home oxygen therapy," 2020, Chronic Respiratory Disease
  • "Conscientiousness, Activity Engagement, and Momentary Affect in Oldest-Old Adulthood," 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "A behavioural activation intervention to increase engagement with life and wellbeing in older adults: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial," 2022, BMC Psychology
  • "Self-Compassion, Stressor Exposure, and Negative Affect: A Daily Diary Study of Older Adults," 2024, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Luszcz has frequently published in a number of venues, including:

  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Gerontology
  • Current Psychology
  • Activities Adaptation & Aging
  • Chronic Respiratory Disease

Collaborators frequently working with Luszcz include Tim D. Windsor, Trevor G. Mazzucchelli, Julia Scott, Ruth Walker, and Teal Evans.

Best Publications

  • Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging

    Lynne C Giles;Gary F V Glonek;Mary A Luszcz;Gary R Andrews

  • Measurement of Executive Function: Considerations for Detecting Adult Age Differences

    Janet Bryan;Mary A. Luszcz

  • The relationship between change in self-perceptions of aging and physical functioning in older adults.

    Kerry A. Sargent-Cox;Kaarin J. Anstey;Mary A. Luszcz

  • Predicting driving cessation over 5 years in older adults: psychological well-being and cognitive competence are stronger predictors than physical health

    Kaarin Jane Anstey;Timothy D Windsor;Mary Alice Luszcz;Gary Andrews

  • The Executive Decline Hypothesis of Cognitive Aging: Do Executive Deficits Qualify as Differential Deficits and Do They Mediate Age-Related Memory Decline?*

    John R. Crawford;Janet Bryan;Mary A. Luszcz;Marc C. Obonsawin

  • Demographic, health, cognitive, and sensory variables as predictors of mortality in very old adults.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Mary A. Luszcz;Lynne C. Giles;Gary R. Andrews

  • Prevalence and Risk Factors for Depression in a Longitudinal, Population-Based Study Including Individuals in the Community and Residential Care.

    Kaarin Jane Anstey;Chwee von Sanden;Kerry Sargent-Cox;Mary Alice Luszcz

  • Sex-specific relevance of diabetes to occlusive vascular and other mortality: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual data from 980 793 adults from 68 prospective studies

    L Gnatiuc;WG Herrington;J Halsey;J Tuomilehto

  • The Role of Perceived Control in Explaining Depressive Symptoms Associated With Driving Cessation in a Longitudinal Study

    Timothy D Windsor;Kaarin Jane Anstey;Peter Butterworth;Mary Alice Luszcz

  • Verbal Knowledge and Speed of Information Processing as Mediators of Age Differences in Verbal Fluency Performance Among Older Adults

    J Bryan;M A Luszcz;John Robertson Crawford

  • An 8-year prospective study of the relationship between cognitive performance and falling in very old adults.

    Kaarin Jane Anstey;Chwee von Sanden;Mary Alice Luszcz

  • A latent growth curve analysis of late-life sensory and cognitive function over 8 years: evidence for specific and common factors underlying change

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Scott M. Hofer;Mary A. Luszcz

  • Successful Aging in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging: Applying the MacArthur Model Cross–Nationally

    Gary Andrews;Michael Clark;Mary Luszcz

  • The health and relationship dynamics of late-life couples: a systematic review of the literature

    Ruth Ballance Walker;Mary Alice Luszcz

  • Longitudinal Change of Self-Perceptions of Aging and Mortality

    Kerry A. Sargent-Cox;Kaarin J. Anstey;Mary A. Luszcz

  • Comorbid chronic diseases, discordant impact on mortality in older people: a 14-year longitudinal population study

    Gillian E Caughey;Emmae N Ramsay;Agnes I Vitry;Andrew L Gilbert

  • Toward Understanding Age-Related Memory Loss in Late Adulthood

    Mary A. Luszcz;Janet Bryan

  • Dual Sensory Loss and Depressive Symptoms: The Importance of Hearing, Daily Functioning, and Activity Engagement

    Kim Matthew Kiely;Kaarin J Anstey;Mary A Luszcz

  • Speed of information processing as a mediator between age and free-recall performance.

    Janet Bryan;Mary A. Luszcz

  • Sense of purpose as a psychological resource for aging well.

    Tim D. Windsor;Rachel G. Curtis;Mary A. Luszcz

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Tim D. Windsor
Tim D. Windsor Flinders University
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Christiane A. Hoppmann
Christiane A. Hoppmann University of British Columbia
Paul Mitchell
Paul Mitchell University of Sydney
Janet Bryan
Janet Bryan University of South Australia
Peter Butterworth
Peter Butterworth Australian National University
Jonathan E. Shaw
Jonathan E. Shaw Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Matthew Knuiman
Matthew Knuiman University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online programs and career options in mental health counseling. Many students opt for online degrees in counseling, social work, or clinical psychology to gain flexibility and meet educational requirements.

Each state has unique standards for aspiring counselors, so it's important to research local regulations. For example, Fort Wayne mental health counselor certification requirements focus on a mix of advanced degrees, supervised clinical experience, and passing licensure exams. Similarly, Fort Worth mental health counselor education requirements emphasize specific coursework and hours of practicum as part of the certification process.

If you are considering other regions, you should also be aware of Fremont mental health counselor certification requirements, which share similarities but may require different types of clinical experience or exams. Likewise, mental health counselor requirements in Fresno outline steps tailored to the unique guidelines of California.

Researching the exact requirements for your region is crucial before choosing your online degree or career pathway in psychology and mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mary A. Luszcz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles