World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3111 2856 1510 1365 215 10892

Maura Borrego publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maura Borrego between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maura Borrego published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 34 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 13 publications
2005 2025

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maura Borrego: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 6
2007 16
2008 13
2009 16
2010 21
2011 20
2012 10
2013 11
2014 12
2015 7
2016 7
2017 16
2018 12
2019 7
2020 10
2021 18
2022 7
2023 9
2024 21
2025 13
Total 255
Download as CSV

Maura Borrego publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maura Borrego sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 215 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 215
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Maura Borrego D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maura Borrego sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Maura Borrego is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in United States. Their research primarily falls within the Social Sciences with a significant focus on Education as a major subfield. Other important subfields include Safety Research, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Media Technology.

Their work spans several key topics in the field of education and STEM, including:

  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Their publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review (2021) published in International Journal of STEM Education
  • Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review (2020) published in Journal of Engineering Education
  • Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace (2021) published in International Journal of STEM Education
  • Funds of Knowledge in STEM Education: A Scoping Review (2021) published in Studies in Engineering Education
  • POSITIONALITY STATEMENTS ARE JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG: MOVING TOWARDS A REFLEXIVE PROCESS (2022) published in Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Frequent coauthors of Maura Borrego's work include Cynthia Finelli, Maya Denton, David B. Knight, Madison Andrews, and Ariel Chasen. This highlights collaborative efforts across various research projects.

Their publications are often featured in venues such as:

  • Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • Journal of Engineering Education
  • 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
  • Biomedical Engineering Education

Best Publications

  • Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education

    Maura Borrego;Elliot P. Douglas;Catherine T. Amelink

  • Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields

    Maura Borrego;Margaret J. Foster;Jeffrey E. Froyd

  • Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies

    Maura Borrego;Charles Henderson

  • Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments

    Maura Borrego;Jeffrey E. Froyd;T. Simin Hall

  • Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes

    Maura Jenkins Borrego;L. K. Newswander

  • Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review

    Maura Borrego;Jennifer Karlin;Lisa D. McNair;Kacey Beddoes

  • The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry

    Maura Borrego;Jonte Bernhard

  • Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning

    Sneha Tharayil;Maura Borrego;Michael Prince;Kevin A. Nguyen

  • Characteristics of Successful Cross‐disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations

    Maura Borrego;Lynita K. Newswander

  • Student Socialization in Interdisciplinary Doctoral Education.

    Daniel Boden;Maura Borrego;Lynita K. Newswander

  • Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods

    Maura Borrego

  • Development of Engineering Education as a Rigorous Discipline: A Study of the Publication Patterns of Four Coalitions

    Maura Borrego

  • Fidelity of implementation of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS) in engineering science courses

    Maura Borrego;Stephanie Cutler;Michael J. Prince;Charles Henderson

  • Feminist Theory in Three Engineering Education Journals: 1995–2008

    Kacey Beddoes;Maura Borrego

  • Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field?

    Brent K. Jesiek;Lynita K. Newswander;Maura Borrego

  • Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty,Chairs, and Deans

    Mary Besterfield-Sacre;Monica F. Cox;Maura Borrego;Kacey Beddoes

  • Estimates of Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses

    Jeffrey E. Froyd;Maura Borrego;Stephanie Cutler;Charles Henderson

  • Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals

    Maura Borrego;Stephanie Cutler

  • Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review

    Kevin A. Nguyen;Maura Borrego;Cynthia J. Finelli;Matt DeMonbrun

  • Student and Faculty Interdisciplinary Identities in Self-Managed Teams

    Lisa D. Mcnair;Chad Newswander;Daniel Boden;Maura Borrego

  • What is the state of the art of systematic reviewin engineering education

    Maura Borrego;Margaret J. Foster;Jeffrey E. Froyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Henderson
Charles Henderson Western Michigan University
Karl A. Smith
Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota
Luis L. Martins
Luis L. Martins The University of Texas at Austin
Carolyn Conner Seepersad
Carolyn Conner Seepersad The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas A. Litzinger
Thomas A. Litzinger Pennsylvania State University
Patrick T. Terenzini
Patrick T. Terenzini Pennsylvania State University
Alan L. Porter
Alan L. Porter Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Online programs now make it easier than ever to pursue advanced degrees while balancing work or family commitments.

For those interested in clinical practice or mental health, psy d programs online provide an accessible path to becoming a licensed psychologist. If you’re passionate about supporting families and couples, check out marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by leading organizations—these programs are designed to equip you with practical, real-world skills.

A master’s degree is a popular choice for advancing your psychology career. The best online masters in psychology offer flexibility and affordability, letting you specialize in areas such as counseling or organizational psychology. For education professionals aiming for leadership roles, fast-track options like the edd programs accelerate your journey to top administrative positions.

Each pathway requires careful consideration of accreditation, tuition, and career goals. Whether you seek to counsel, teach, or lead, online degrees offer a range of options to help you advance in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Maura Borrego

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles