World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
15822
World Ranking
1865
National Ranking
892

Charles Henderson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Henderson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 264 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charles Henderson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Henderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Henderson is affiliated with Western Michigan University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a strong emphasis on education and developmental and educational psychology. The focus within these fields includes various aspects of teaching practices, learning methods, and career development.

Their work often explores innovative and experimental approaches to teaching and learning. Key topics in Charles Henderson's research include:

  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Charles Henderson has contributed to a range of academic publications, frequently appearing in several notable venues such as:

  • Physical Review Physics Education Research
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CrossCurrents
  • Frontiers in Education

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors" (2021) in PLoS ONE
  • "Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses" (2022) in International Journal of STEM Education
  • "Design-Based Science with Communication Scaffolding Results in Productive Conversations and Improved Learning for Secondary Students" (2020) in Research in Science Education
  • "Educational supports and career goals of five women in a graduate astronomy program" (2020) in Physical Review Physics Education Research
  • "The Benefits of Intergenerational Wisdom-Sharing: A Randomized Controlled Study" (2022) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Charles Henderson frequently collaborates with several co-authors who have contributed to multiple works alongside them. These include:

  • Marilyne Stains
  • Jeffrey R. Raker
  • Estrella Johnson
  • Melissa Dancy
  • M. Carrington Reid

Best Publications

  • Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature

    Charles Henderson;Andrea Beach;Noah Finkelstein

  • Effects of nurse home-visiting on maternal life course and child development: age 6 follow-up results of a randomized trial.

    David L. Olds;Harriet Kitzman;Robert Cole;JoAnn Robinson

  • Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics

    Charles Henderson;Melissa H. Dancy

  • Blood Lead Concentrations < 10 μg/dL and Child Intelligence at 6 Years of Age

    Todd A. Jusko;Charles R. Henderson;Bruce P. Lanphear;Deborah A. Cory-Slechta

  • Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: age 4 follow-up results of a randomized trial.

    David L. Olds;JoAnn Robinson;Lisa Pettitt;Dennis W. Luckey

  • Long-term Effects of Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visitation on the Life Course of Youths: 19-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial

    John Eckenrode;Mary Campa;Dennis W. Luckey;Charles R. Henderson

  • Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies

    Maura Borrego;Charles Henderson

  • Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life

    David L. Olds;Charles R. Henderson;Harriet Kitzman

  • Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process?

    Charles Henderson;Melissa Dancy;Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj

  • Improving the life-course development of socially disadvantaged mothers: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation.

    D L Olds;C R Henderson;R Tatelbaum;R Chamberlin

  • Enduring Effects of Prenatal and Infancy Home Visiting by Nurses on Maternal Life Course and Government Spending Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Among Children at Age 12 Years

    David L. Olds;Harriet J. Kitzman;Robert E. Cole;Carole A. Hanks

  • Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty

    Melissa Dancy;Charles Henderson

  • Enduring Effects of Prenatal and Infancy Home Visiting by Nurses on Children: Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Among Children at Age 12 Years

    Harriet J. Kitzman;David L. Olds;Robert E. Cole;Carole A. Hanks

  • Enduring Effects of Nurse Home Visitation on Maternal Life Course: A 3-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial

    Harriet Kitzman;David L. Olds;Kimberly Sidora;Charles R. Henderson

  • Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States

    Charles Henderson;Melissa H. Dancy

  • Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations

    Charles Henderson;Melissa H. Dancy

  • Outcomes Associated with Opioid Use in the Treatment of Chronic Noncancer Pain in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

    Maria Papaleontiou;Charles R. Henderson;Barbara J. Turner;Alison A. Moore

  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Elder Abuse and Neglect in the Community: A Population-Based Study.

    David Burnes;Karl Pillemer;Paul L. Caccamise;Art Mason

  • Gender Discrimination in Physics and Astronomy: Graduate Student Experiences of Sexism and Gender Microaggressions.

    Ramón S. Barthelemy;Melinda McCormick;Charles Henderson

  • Prevalence of Financial Fraud and Scams Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    David Burnes;Charles R. Henderson;Christine Sheppard;Rebecca Zhao

  • The Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Introductory Physics: Where do Faculty Leave the Innovation-Decision Process?

    Charles Henderson;Melissa Dancy;Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj

Frequent Co-Authors

Noah D. Finkelstein
Noah D. Finkelstein University of Colorado Boulder
Maura Borrego
Maura Borrego The University of Texas at Austin
Karl Pillemer
Karl Pillemer Cornell University
Chris Rasmussen
Chris Rasmussen San Diego State University
John Eckenrode
John Eckenrode Cornell University
Bruce P. Lanphear
Bruce P. Lanphear Simon Fraser University
JoAnn Robinson
JoAnn Robinson University of Connecticut
Keith Matthews
Keith Matthews California Institute of Technology
Roger Smith
Roger Smith University of Newcastle Australia
Michael J. Escuti
Michael J. Escuti North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in advancing your career in Social Sciences and Humanities? Online degree programs now make it easier than ever to study from anywhere while balancing work and life commitments. Options range from counseling and therapy to leadership and education roles.

For those pursuing clinical practice, programs like shortest online psyd programs offer accelerated routes to earning your doctorate in psychology. Students aiming to become licensed marriage and family therapists can choose specialized lmft programs that focus on practical skills and clinical preparation.

Cost is a major consideration for today’s learners. If you’re seeking value, there are many online psychology masters degrees that are both reputable and budget-friendly. For professionals interested in leadership or higher education roles, a fastest edd program online can help accelerate your career trajectory.

Each of these online programs offers flexibility and a pathway to diverse roles in academia, counseling, research, and beyond—making advanced education more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Henderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles