World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8519 7954 4558 4150 122 7249

Lisa M. Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa M. Jones between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa M. Jones published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 11 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa M. Jones: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 2
2010 9
2011 8
2012 12
2013 9
2014 9
2015 8
2016 9
2017 7
2018 8
2019 8
2020 18
2021 17
2022 6
2023 7
2024 6
2025 10
2026 1
Total 176
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa M. Jones is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, gender studies, and health. This interdisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive examination of complex social issues.

Their work addresses several key topics within these fields, including:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Homelessness and Social Issues

Jones has published frequently in venues such as:

  • Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Violence and Victims
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • Prevention Science

Their recent papers demonstrate the range of their research inquiry. Selected works include:

  • Youth Internet Safety Education: Aligning Programs With the Evidence Base, 2020, Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • Strengthening the predictive power of screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in younger and older children, 2020, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Poly-victimization, Trauma, and Resilience: Exploring Strengths That Promote Thriving After Adversity, 2020, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Perceptions of Health and Well-Being Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Emerging Adults, 2021, LGBT Health
  • Evaluating the Impact of a Youth-Led Sexual Violence Prevention Program: Youth Leadership Retreat Outcomes, 2022, Prevention Science

Jones has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Kimberly J. Mitchell
  • Heather A. Turner
  • Victoria L. Banyard
  • Jennifer E. O'Brien
  • David Finkelhor

The research themes that Jones engages with reflect a focus on trauma, violence, and victimization across various contexts. Their interest in gender, social issues, and preventive interventions aligns with ongoing efforts to address vulnerability and resilience in affected populations.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study

    Kimberly J Mitchell;David Finkelhor;Lisa M Jones;Janis Wolak

  • Why Have Child Maltreatment and Child Victimization Declined

    David Finkelhor;Lisa M Jones

  • Trends in youth internet victimization: findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000-2010

    Lisa M. Jones;Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship

    Lisa M Jones;Kimberly J Mitchell

  • Online Harassment in Context: Trends From Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010)

    Lisa M. Jones;Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Why is sexual abuse declining? A survey of state child protection administrators.

    Lisa M Jones;David Finkelhor;Kathy Kopiec

  • Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: Empirical data on a practice model

    Theodore P. Cross;Lisa M. Jones;Wendy A. Walsh;Monique Simone

  • Updated Trends in Child Maltreatment, 2008.

    David Finkelhor;Lisa M. Jones;Anne M. Shattuck

  • Prosecution of Child Abuse A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Criminal Justice Decisions

    Theodore P. Cross;Wendy A. Walsh;Monique Simone;Lisa M. Jones

  • Telling Interviewers About Sexual Abuse: Predictors of Child Disclosure at Forensic Interviews

    Tonya Lippert;Theodore P Cross;Lisa M Jones;Wendy A. Walsh

  • Internet-Facilitated Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children: Findings From a Nationally Representative Sample of Law Enforcement Agencies in the United States

    Kimberly J. Mitchell;Lisa M. Jones;David Finkelhor;Janis Wolak

  • Do Children's Advocacy Centers improve families' experiences of child sexual abuse investigations?

    Lisa M. Jones;Theodore Paul Cross;Wendy A. Walsh;Monique Simone

  • Child Maltreatment Trends in the 1990s: Why Does Neglect Differ From Sexual and Physical Abuse?

    Lisa M. Jones;David Finkelhor;Stephanie Halter

  • Prosecuting Child Sexual Abuse The Importance of Evidence Type

    Wendy A. Walsh;Lisa M. Jones;Theodore P. Cross;Tonya Lippert

  • Updated Trends in Child Maltreatment, 2013.

    David Finkelhor;Kei Saito;Lisa M. Jones

  • Victim Reports of Bystander Reactions to In-Person and Online Peer Harassment: A National Survey of Adolescents

    Lisa M. Jones;Kimberly J. Mitchell;Heather A. Turner

  • Explanations for the Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

    David Finkelhor;Lisa M. Jones

  • Use of social networking sites in online sex crimes against minors: an examination of national incidence and means of utilization.

    Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor;Lisa M. Jones;Janis Wolak

  • Youth Internet Safety Education: Aligning Programs With the Evidence Base:

    David Finkelhor;Kerryann Walsh;Lisa Jones;Kimberly Mitchell

  • Criminal investigations of child abuse: the research behind "best practices".

    Lisa M. Jones;Theodore P. Cross;Wendy A. Walsh;Monique Simone

  • Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2007

    Lisa M. Jones;David Finkelhor

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly J. Mitchell
Kimberly J. Mitchell University of New Hampshire
David Finkelhor
David Finkelhor University of New Hampshire
Sherry Hamby
Sherry Hamby Sewanee: The University of the South
Heather A. Turner
Heather A. Turner University of New Hampshire
Janis Wolak
Janis Wolak University of New Hampshire
David J. Kolko
David J. Kolko University of Pittsburgh
Michele L. Ybarra
Michele L. Ybarra Johns Hopkins University
Susan M. Swearer
Susan M. Swearer University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Katie M. Edwards
Katie M. Edwards University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Victoria L. Banyard
Victoria L. Banyard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens numerous doors to advanced education and dynamic career pathways. Many students choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility, allowing them to balance studies with other commitments. Pursuing a career in counseling or therapy often requires further postgraduate training and licensure, which varies by state.

To become a licensed professional counselor, you must meet specific state requirements. For example, the Sacramento licensed therapist requirements outline coursework, supervised clinical hours, and state licensure exams. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Minnesota should review licensed therapist requirements in Saint Paul.

If you’re considering a career in Texas, understanding the licensed therapist requirements in San Antonio is essential. Likewise, California’s regulations differ, so make sure you know the San Diego licensed therapist requirements as well.

Thorough research and planning can help ensure your education aligns with your licensure goals, setting you up for a rewarding career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles