World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
27224
World Ranking
1766
National Ranking
1042

Kimberly J. Mitchell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kimberly J. Mitchell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimberly J. Mitchell is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research spans a broad range of topics within social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on the intersections of trauma, victimization, and health in adolescent and youth populations.

Their scholarly output includes work in major publication venues such as:

  • Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Violence and Victims

Mitchell's research interests cover multiple subfields of study including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Health
  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology

Key topics addressed in their work are:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Mitchell include:

  • "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Perceptions of Health and Well-Being Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Emerging Adults," 2021, published in LGBT Health
  • "Youth Internet Safety Education: Aligning Programs With the Evidence Base," 2020, published in Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • "Strengthening the predictive power of screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in younger and older children," 2020, published in Child Abuse & Neglect
  • "Poly-victimization, Trauma, and Resilience: Exploring Strengths That Promote Thriving After Adversity," 2020, published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • "COVID-19 Among Youth in Israel: Correlates of Decisions to Vaccinate and Reasons for Refusal," 2021, published in Journal of Adolescent Health

Mitchell collaborates frequently with a consistent group of co-authors, which include:

  • Lisa M. Jones
  • Victoria L. Banyard
  • Jennifer E. O'Brien
  • Michele L. Ybarra
  • Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan

Best Publications

  • Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. Mitchell

  • Youth Engaging in Online Harassment: Associations with Caregiver-Child Relationships, Internet Use, and Personal Characteristics.

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. K. Mitchell

  • Online victimization: A report on the nation’s youth.

    David Finkelhor;Kimberly J. Mitchell;Janis Wolak

  • Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment

    Janis Wolak;Simon David Finkelhor;Kimberly J. Mitchell;Michele L. Ybarra

  • Does Online Harassment Constitute Bullying? An Exploration of Online Harassment by Known Peers and Online-Only Contacts

    Janis Wolak;Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey.

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. Mitchell;Janis Wolak;David Finkelhor

  • Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study

    Kimberly J Mitchell;David Finkelhor;Lisa M Jones;Janis Wolak

  • Exposure to internet pornography among children and adolescents: a national survey.

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. Mitchell

  • Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users.

    Janis Wolak;Kimberly J Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Online Victimization of Youth : Five Years Later.

    Janis Wolak;Kimberly J Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Online "predators" and their victims: myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment.

    Janis Wolak;David Finkelhor;Kimberly J. Mitchell;Michele L. Ybarra

  • The Relative Importance of Online Victimization in Understanding Depression, Delinquency, and Substance Use:

    Kimberly J Mitchell;Michele L Ybarra;David Finkelhor

  • How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs.

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. Mitchell

  • Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships.

    Janis Wolak;Kimberly J Mitchell;David Finkelhor

  • Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: implications for adolescent health.

    Michele L. Ybarra;Kimberly J. Mitchell

  • The Exposure of Youth to Unwanted Sexual Material on the Internet: A National Survey of Risk, Impact, and Prevention.

    Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor;Janis Wolak

  • Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: implications for prevention based on findings from a national study.

    Janis Wolak;David Finkelhor;Kimberly J Mitchell

  • The Co-occurrence of Internet Harassment and Unwanted Sexual Solicitation Victimization and Perpetration: Associations with Psychosocial Indicators

    Michele L. Ybarra;Dorothy L. Espelage;Kimberly J. Mitchell

  • Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth.

    Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor;Janis Wolak

  • Trends in youth internet victimization: findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000-2010

    Lisa M. Jones;Kimberly J. Mitchell;David Finkelhor

Frequent Co-Authors

David Finkelhor
David Finkelhor University of New Hampshire
Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones University of New Hampshire
Janis Wolak
Janis Wolak University of New Hampshire
Michele L. Ybarra
Michele L. Ybarra Johns Hopkins University
Sherry Hamby
Sherry Hamby Sewanee: The University of the South
Heather A. Turner
Heather A. Turner University of New Hampshire
Katie M. Edwards
Katie M. Edwards University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Victoria L. Banyard
Victoria L. Banyard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Dorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology career opens the door to a diverse range of online degrees and specialized learning paths. For those interested in understanding behavior and human motivation, several of the best behavioral psychology degree programs are available online. These programs provide strong foundations in clinical and research skills.

If you're seeking leadership roles or wish to shape workplace culture, consider colleges with industrial organizational psychology majors. These degrees focus on employee well-being, performance, and organizational development.

Advanced learners and professionals might pursue an online phd in industrial organizational psychology. This qualification can lead to senior consultant, academic, or executive coaching careers and often involves original research or practical projects.

For individuals wanting to enhance their credentials quickly, the best graduate certificate in psychology online enriches specific knowledge areas. Certificates are an affordable way to build expertise while balancing work commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly J. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles