World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6192
World Ranking
8540
National Ranking
3634

Tim Kiemel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Kiemel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tim Kiemel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Kiemel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Kiemel is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with notable contributions in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, biomedical engineering, physical therapy, sports therapy, rehabilitation, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their work centers on key topics including motor control and adaptation, action observation and synchronization, balance, gait, and falls prevention, lower extremity biomechanics and pathologies, diabetic foot ulcer assessment and management, neural and behavioral psychology studies, as well as muscle activation and electromyography studies.

The following papers reflect the scope of their recent research:

  • Multiple strategies to correct errors in foot placement and control speed in human walking, 2020, Experimental Brain Research
  • Unveiling the neuromechanical mechanisms underlying the synergistic interactions in human sensorimotor system, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Interpersonal motor synergy: coworking strategy depends on task constraints, 2021, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Modeling Human-Human Collaboration: A Connection Between Inter-Personal Motor Synergy and Consensus Algorithms, 2022, 2022 American Control Conference (ACC)
  • Modeling Human-Human Collaboration: A Connection Between Inter-Personal Motor Synergy and Consensus Algorithms, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors contributing to these works include Sara Honarvar, Yancy Diaz-Mercado, Jae Kun Shim, Jin-Oh Hahn, and Mia Caminita.

Publishing venues associated with Tim Kiemel's research encompass Experimental Brain Research, Scientific Reports, Journal of Neurophysiology, the 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture.

    Kelvin S Oie;Tim Kiemel;John J Jeka

  • Control and estimation of posture during quiet stance depends on multijoint coordination.

    Wei-Li Hsu;John P. Scholz;Gregor Schöner;John J. Jeka

  • Topological and phenomenological classification of bursting oscillations

    Richard Bertram;Manish J. Butte;Tim Kiemel;Arthur Sherman

  • Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration.

    John Jeka;Tim Kiemel;Tim Kiemel;Robert Creath;Fay Horak

  • A unified view of quiet and perturbed stance: simultaneous co-existing excitable modes.

    Robert Creath;Tim Kiemel;Fay Horak;Robert Peterka

  • Modelling of intersegmental coordination in the lamprey central pattern generator for locomotion.

    Avis H. Cohen;G. Bard Ermentrout;Tim Kiemel;Nancy Kopell

  • Multisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway.

    Tim Kiemel;Kelvin S. Oie;John J. Jeka

  • Multisensory information for human postural control: integrating touch and vision

    John Jeka;Kelvin S. Oie;Tim Kiemel

  • Modeling the dynamics of sensory reweighting.

    Sean Carver;Tim Kiemel;John J. Jeka

  • DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISENSORY REWEIGHTING FOR POSTURE CONTROL IN CHILDREN

    Woei-Nan Bair;Tim Kiemel;John J. Jeka;Jane E. Clark

  • Identification of Neural Feedback for Upright Stance in Humans: Stabilization rather than Sway Minimization

    Tim Kiemel;Yuanfen Zhang;John J. Jeka

  • The Dynamics of Visual Reweighting in Healthy and Fall-Prone Older Adults

    John J Jeka;Leslie K Allison;Tim Kiemel

  • Slow Dynamics of Postural Sway Are in the Feedback Loop

    Tim Kiemel;Kelvin S. Oie;John J. Jeka

  • The many roles of vision during walking

    David Logan;Tim Kiemel;Nadia Dominici;Germana Cappellini

  • Multisensory reweighting of vision and touch is intact in healthy and fall-prone older adults

    Leslie K. Allison;Tim Kiemel;John J. Jeka

  • Identification of the Plant for Upright Stance in Humans: Multiple Movement Patterns From a Single Neural Strategy

    Tim Kiemel;Alexander J. Elahi;John J. Jeka

  • Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion

    Sungjae Hwang;Peter Agada;Tim Kiemel;John J. Jeka

  • Limited control strategies with the loss of vestibular function.

    Rob Creath;Tim Kiemel;Fay Horak;John J. Jeka

  • Sensory reweighting with translational visual stimuli in young and elderly adults: the role of state-dependent noise.

    John Jeka;Leslie Allison;Mark Saffer;Yuanfen Zhang

  • Coherence analysis of muscle activity during quiet stance

    Mark Saffer;Tim Kiemel;John Jeka

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Jeka
John J. Jeka University of Delaware
Fay B. Horak
Fay B. Horak Oregon Health & Science University
Yuri P. Ivanenko
Yuri P. Ivanenko Collège de France
Philip Holmes
Philip Holmes Princeton University
Francesco Lacquaniti
Francesco Lacquaniti University of Rome Tor Vergata
Robert J. Peterka
Robert J. Peterka Oregon Health & Science University
Jane E. Clark
Jane E. Clark University of Maryland, College Park
Gregor Schöner
Gregor Schöner Ruhr University Bochum
Noah J. Cowan
Noah J. Cowan Johns Hopkins University
Nancy Kopell
Nancy Kopell Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, there are several online degree and career options that complement this field. Aspiring professionals may consider clinical or counseling careers by exploring some of the best online psyd programs, which offer a flexible route to earning a doctorate in psychology. These programs can prepare graduates for advanced roles in mental health care and research.

If your interests include working with families and couples, pursuing lmft online programs could be a strategic choice. Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (LMFTs) play a critical role in mental health and often collaborate with neuroscience professionals.

For students looking for a quicker path, earning a bachelor degree online in 2 years is an efficient way to launch a career or build a strong foundation for graduate study in neuroscience.

It’s also valuable to consider future earnings when choosing a degree. Reviewing the highest paying majors can help you make informed decisions about your educational investment and long-term career goals in neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Kiemel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles