World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4436
World Ranking
8638
National Ranking
230

Alfred C. Schouten publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred C. Schouten sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alfred C. Schouten D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred C. Schouten sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alfred C. Schouten is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including medicine, engineering, and neuroscience, with a strong focus on biomedical engineering, neurology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research topics prominently cover muscle activation and electromyography studies, balance and gait with falls prevention, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience and neural engineering, as well as prosthetics and rehabilitation robotics. Additionally, their work addresses neurological disorders and treatments.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Research Square, NeuroImage, and the Journal of Biomechanics.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Alfred C. Schouten include:

  • Theta but not beta power is positively associated with better explicit motor task learning (2021), published in NeuroImage
  • Nonlinear Modeling of Cortical Responses to Mechanical Wrist Perturbations Using the NARMAX Method (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Combining Ultrafast Ultrasound and High-Density EMG to Assess Local Electromechanical Muscle Dynamics: A Feasibility Study (2021), published in IEEE Access
  • Mild Stroke, Serious Problems: Limitations in Balance and Gait Capacity and the Impact on Fall Rate, and Physical Activity (2023), published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment (2022), published in NeuroImage Clinical

The scientist collaborates extensively with several frequent co-authors, including Winfred Mugge, Herman van der Kooij, Christopher P. Cop, Massimo Sartori, and F.C.T. van der Helm.

Best Publications

  • Identification of intrinsic and reflexive components of human arm dynamics during postural control.

    Frans C.T. van der Helm;Alfred C. Schouten;Erwin de Vlugt;Guido G. Brouwn

  • Task, muscle and frequency dependent vestibular control of posture

    Patrick A. Forbes;Patrick A. Forbes;Gunter P. Siegmund;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten;Jean-Sébastien Blouin

  • Design of an electric series elastic actuated joint for robotic gait rehabilitation training

    Claude Lagoda;Alfred C. Schouten;Arno H. A. Stienen;Edsko E. G. Hekman

  • Impaired standing balance: The clinical need for closing the loop

    J.H. Pasma;D. Engelhart;A.C. Schouten;H. van der Kooij

  • A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks

    Winfred Mugge;David A. Abbink;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten;Julius P. A. Dewald

  • Cortical dynamics during preparation and execution of reactive balance responses with distinct postural demands

    Teodoro Solis-Escalante;Teodoro Solis-Escalante;Joris van der Cruijsen;Digna de Kam;Joost van Kordelaar

  • Quantifying Proprioceptive Reflexes During Position Control of the Human Arm

    A.C. Schouten;E. de Vlugt;J.J.B. van Hilten;F.C.T. van der Helm

  • Adaptation of reflexive feedback during arm posture to different environments.

    Erwin de Vlugt;Alfred C. Schouten;Frans C. T. van der Helm

  • Closed-loop multivariable system identification for the characterization of the dynamic arm compliance using continuous force disturbances: a model study.

    Erwin de Vlugt;Alfred C. Schouten;Frans C.T. van der Helm

  • Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control

    Tjitske Boonstra;Alfred Christiaan Schouten;Herman van der Kooij

  • Unveiling neural coupling within the sensorimotor system: directionality and nonlinearity

    Yuan Yang;Yuan Yang;Julius P. A. Dewald;Julius P. A. Dewald;Frans C. T. van der Helm;Frans C. T. van der Helm;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten

  • Changes in sensory reweighting of proprioceptive information during standing balance with age and disease

    J.H. Pasma;D. Engelhart;A.B. Maier;A.C. Schouten

  • Sensory Weighting of Force and Position Feedback in Human Motor Control Tasks

    W. Mugge;J. Schuurmans;Alfred Christiaan Schouten;F.C.T. van der Helm

  • Sensory reweighting of proprioceptive information of the left and right leg during human balance control

    J. H. Pasma;T. A. Boonstra;S. F. Campfens;A. C. Schouten;A. C. Schouten

  • Quantification of intrinsic and reflexive properties during multijoint arm posture.

    Erwin de Vlugt;Alfred C. Schouten;Frans C.T. van der Helm

  • Design of a torque-controlled manipulator to analyse the admittance of the wrist joint.

    Alfred C. Schouten;Erwin de Vlugt;J.J.Bob van Hilten;J.J.Bob van Hilten;Frans C.T. van der Helm

  • Motor control in complex regional pain syndrome: A kinematic analysis

    J.C.M. Schilder;Alfred Christiaan Schouten;Alfred Christiaan Schouten;R.S.G.M. Perez;F.J.P.M. Huygen

  • A force-controlled planar haptic device for movement control analysis of the human arm

    Erwin de Vlugt;Alfred C. Schouten;Frans C.T. van der Helm;Piet C. Teerhuis

  • The monosynaptic Ia afferent pathway can largely explain the stretch duration effect of the long latency M2 response.

    Jasper Schuurmans;Erwin de Vlugt;Alfred C. Schouten;Carel G. M. Meskers

  • Impaired standing balance in elderly: a new engineering method helps to unravel causes and effects.

    Denise Engelhart;Jantsje H. Pasma;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten;Carel G.M. Meskers

Frequent Co-Authors

Herman van der Kooij
Herman van der Kooij University of Twente
F.C.T. van der Helm
F.C.T. van der Helm Delft University of Technology
Yuan Yang
Yuan Yang Columbia University
Lo J. Bour
Lo J. Bour University of Amsterdam
Peter H. Veltink
Peter H. Veltink University of Twente
Michel J. A. M. van Putten
Michel J. A. M. van Putten University of Twente
Jacobus J. van Hilten
Jacobus J. van Hilten Leiden University Medical Center
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen Radboud University
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alfred C. Schouten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles