World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
46740
World Ranking
9891
National Ranking
955

Michael J. Campbell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael J. Campbell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Campbell is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a notable concentration in Ocean Engineering as a significant subfield. Other subfields include General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, among which Offshore Engineering and Technologies, Oil and Gas Production Techniques, and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies are prominent. Additional areas of focus include Drilling and Well Engineering, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life.

Michael J. Campbell has published extensively, with frequent contributions to venues such as the Offshore Technology Conference, British Journal of Sports Medicine, BMJ Open, Pilot and Feasibility Studies, and Biology of Sex Differences.

Recent papers include:

  • "A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration," 2021, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Reflection on modern methods: demystifying robust standard errors for epidemiologists," 2020, International Journal of Epidemiology
  • "CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers: the CHAMP statement," 2021, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework," 2023, Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • "Progression from external pilot to definitive randomised controlled trial: a methodological review of progression criteria reporting," 2021, BMJ Open

Frequent coauthors include Gillian Lancaster, Mohammad Alì Mansournia, Sally Hopewell, Lehana Thabane, and Sandra Eldridge. Each of these collaborators has contributed multiple times alongside Michael J. Campbell.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.

    J. N. S. Matthews;D. G. Altman;M. J. Campbell;P. Royston

  • CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.

    Sandra M. Eldridge;Claire L. Chan;Michael J. Campbell;Christine M. Bond

  • CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials

    Sandra Eldridge;Claire L Chan;Michael J. Campbell;Christine M. Bond

  • Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable

    Amy L Whitehead;Steven A Julious;Cindy L Cooper;Michael J Campbell

  • What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.

    Mubashir Arain;Michael J Campbell;Cindy L Cooper;Gillian A Lancaster

  • Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework.

    Sandra M. Eldridge;Gillian A. Lancaster;Michael J. Campbell;Lehana Thabane

  • Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial

    Melanie J. Davies;S. Heller;T.C. Skinner;M.J. Campbell

  • The relationship between upper respiratory infections and hospital admissions for asthma : A time-trend analysis

    S. L. Johnston;P. K. Pattemore;G. Sanderson;S. Smith

  • Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer's disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices

    David A. Lewis;Michael J. Campbell;Robert D. Terry;John H. Morrison

  • Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment.

    Colin R. Kennedy;Donna C. McCann;Michael J. Campbell;Catherine M. Law

  • Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial

    C Thompson;A L Kinmonth;L Stevens;R C Peveler

  • Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk

    Ann Louise Kinmonth;Alison Woodcock;Simon Griffin;Nicki Spiegal

  • Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis.

    Geoffrey Adams;Martin C. Gulliford;Obioha C. Ukoumunne;Sandra Eldridge

  • Medical statistics: A commonsense approach

    Michael J. Campbell;David Machin

  • Statistical tables for the design of clinical trials

    David Machin;Michael J. Campbell

  • Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care

    Kamlesh Khunti;Laura J. Gray;Timothy Chas Skinner;Marian E Carey

  • The distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive fibers in primate neocortex is widespread but regionally specific

    D. A. Lewis;M. J. Campbell;S. L. Foote;M. Goldstein

  • Red blood cell magnesium and chronic fatigue syndrome

    I.M. Cox;M.J. Campbell;D. Dowson

  • Effects of self-help post-myocardial-infarction rehabilitation on psychological adjustment and use of health services

    B. Lewin;I.R. Robertson;E.L. Cay;J.B. Irving

  • Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Kamlesh Khunti;Laura J Gray;Timothy Skinner;Marian E Carey

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Heller
Simon Heller University of Sheffield
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Steven A. Julious
Steven A. Julious University of Sheffield
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Sally Hopewell
Sally Hopewell University of Oxford
Mark D. Kilby
Mark D. Kilby University of Birmingham
Alan Brennan
Alan Brennan University of Sheffield
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Martin Vessey
Martin Vessey University of Oxford
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Medicine in the USA can open a range of rewarding career options, both clinical and non-clinical. For students interested in pharmacy, a 3 year online pharmd program offers a fast-track pathway to becoming a pharmacy professional, with the flexibility of remote learning.

Those looking to work with healthcare data may find value in health information technology programs online. These degrees prepare graduates for roles in managing and securing sensitive medical records, a rapidly growing field as digital healthcare expands.

If administrative healthcare roles are of interest, consider earning a recognized credential through medical billing and coding certification cost programs. This certification can be completed affordably online, leading to essential roles within hospitals and clinics.

For those wishing to provide advanced patient care, nurse practitioner programs offer the opportunity to become a licensed practitioner in a flexible online format, expanding career potential in primary care or specialized medical fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles