World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
9278
World Ranking
9142
National Ranking
3889

W. Lewis Johnson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Lewis Johnson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

W. Lewis Johnson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Lewis Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Lewis Johnson is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their work primarily spans areas intersecting artificial intelligence, education, and medical imaging. The scientist's contributions encompass research on intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning, and the application of machine learning in medical imaging, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to both technological and educational challenges.

Their recent publications include:

  • How to Harness Generative AI to Accelerate Human Learning (2023), published in the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Case Study: Rapid Training of Community Health Workers Using Enskill® (2021), published in the International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC)
  • Several editorial board contributions in the Journal of Surgical Oncology from 2020 to 2022

Johnson's frequent co-authors include Stephen Sener, David J. Bentrem, Walley Temple, Perry Shen, and Joel Baumgartner. These collaborations suggest an interdisciplinary network that spans areas in education, artificial intelligence, and surgical oncology.

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC)

Their research intersects several subfields and topics, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Main areas of topical focus within their research include:

  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

W. Lewis Johnson's scholarly output reflects a blend of educational technology and medical research disciplines, emphasizing the role of AI-driven methodologies in both human learning and clinical imaging contexts. The diversity of venues and coauthor networks illustrates an integration of computational and applied sciences within their research agenda.

Best Publications

  • Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments

    W. Lewis Johnson;Jeff W. Rickel;James C. Lester

  • Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, cognition, and motor control

    Jeff Rickel;W. Lewis Johnson

  • Intelligent Agents for Interactive Simulation Environments

    Milind Tambe;W. Lewis Johnson;Randolph M. Jones;Frank V. Koss

  • The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes

    Ning Wang;W. Lewis Johnson;Richard E. Mayer;Paola Rizzo

  • Pedagogical agents on the Web

    Erin Shaw;W. Lewis Johnson;Rajaram Ganeshan

  • Interactive pedagogical drama

    Stacy C. Marsella;W. Lewis Johnson;Catherine LaBore

  • Toward the holodeck: integrating graphics, sound, character and story

    R. Hill;J. Gratch;W. L. Johnson;C. Kyriakakis

  • Serious Games for Language Learning: How Much Game, How Much AI?

    W. Lewis Johnson;Hannes Vilhjalmsson;Stacy Marsella

  • Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using AI to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures

    W. Lewis Johnson;Andre Valente

  • Steve: an animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments

    W. Lewis Johnson;Jeff Rickel

  • Serious Use of a Serious Game for Language Learning

    W. Lewis Johnson

  • Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds

    Jeff Rickel;W. Lewis Johnson

  • Face-to-Face Interaction with Pedagogical Agents, Twenty Years Later

    W. Lewis Johnson;James C. Lester

  • Interactive Pedagogical Drama for Health Interventions

    Stacy C. Marsella;W. Lewis Johnson;Catherine M. LaBore

  • Integrating Pedagogical Agents into Virtual Environments

    W. Lewis Johnson;Jeff Rickel;Randy Stiles;Allen Munro

  • A prototype infrastructure for distributed robot-agent-person teams

    Paul Scerri;David Pynadath;Lewis Johnson;Paul Rosenbloom

  • Integrating pedagogical capabilities in a virtual environment agent

    Jeff Rickel;W. Lewis Johnson

  • Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped?

    Geraldine Clarebout;Jan Elen;W. Lewis Johnson;Erin Shaw

  • Mapping each of several communicative functions during contexts to multiple coordinated behaviors of a virtual character

    W. Lewis Johnson;Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson

  • Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software

    Richard E. Mayer;W. Lewis Johnson;Erin Shaw;Sahiba Sandhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Stacy Marsella
Stacy Marsella Northeastern University
Richard E. Mayer
Richard E. Mayer University of California, Santa Barbara
Elisabeth André
Elisabeth André University of Augsburg
James C. Lester
James C. Lester North Carolina State University
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Catherine Pelachaud
Catherine Pelachaud Sorbonne University
Cristiano Castelfranchi
Cristiano Castelfranchi National Research Council (CNR)
Toru Ishida
Toru Ishida Hong Kong Baptist University
Maria Gini
Maria Gini University of Minnesota
Jan Elen
Jan Elen KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open a variety of opportunities, regardless of your academic background. Many prospective students wonder, will grad schools accept low gpa? The answer varies, but increasingly, online programs recognize different strengths and offer flexible admissions policies.

If you’re interested in interdisciplinary fields, you might ask, what can you do with an environmental studies degree? Environmental science and computer science often intersect, especially in areas like data analysis and sustainability technologies.

For those looking to accelerate their learning, there are excellent options for a computer science accelerated program. These programs can help you enter the workforce or continue on to graduate studies more quickly.

If you’re considering engineering, pursuing an environmental engineering degree online can provide affordable and flexible learning pathways. This degree can lead to rewarding roles designing sustainable solutions in both private and public sectors.

Best Scientists Citing W. Lewis Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles