World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 56 1849 1666 885 786 115 18598

Arline T. Geronimus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arline T. Geronimus between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arline T. Geronimus published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2014. 7 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2014. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1985 2026

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arline T. Geronimus: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 6
1992 6
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 0
2006 5
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 2
2011 6
2012 2
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 5
2020 4
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 6
2026 1
Total 120
Download as CSV

Arline T. Geronimus publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arline T. Geronimus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Arline T. Geronimus D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arline T. Geronimus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109 56
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Arline T. Geronimus is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within medicine and social sciences, with particular focus on health disparities, HIV/AIDS research, and issues relating to LGBTQ health and policy.

Their work extensively addresses key topics such as health disparities and outcomes, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, HIV, drug use, and sexual risk, reproductive health and technologies, racial and ethnic identity research, and sex work and related issues.

Geronimus has a significant number of publications in fields including health, sociology and political science, general health professions, infectious diseases, and social psychology. This body of work contributes to understanding complex social determinants of health and health inequities.

Recent papers by Geronimus and collaborators include:

  • "Associations between breast cancer subtype and neighborhood socioeconomic and racial composition among Black and White women," 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • "Weathering in Detroit: Place, Race, Ethnicity, and Poverty as Conceptually Fluctuating Social Constructs Shaping Variation in Allostatic Load," 2020, Milbank Quarterly
  • "Differences in All-Cause Mortality Among Transgender and Non-Transgender People Enrolled in Private Insurance," 2022, Demography
  • "State-Level Policy Stigma and Non-Prescribed Hormones Use among Trans Populations in the United States: A Mediational Analysis of Insurance and Anticipated Stigma," 2021, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • "US Black-White Differences in Mortality Risk Among Transgender and Cisgender People in Private Insurance, 2011-2019," 2022, American Journal of Public Health

Their frequent co-authors include John Bound, Landon D. Hughes, Kristefer Stojanovski, Elizabeth J. King, and Wesley M. King. Collaborations with these researchers have been consistent and recurrent.

Geronimus's work has been published repeatedly in several journals, including:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Milbank Quarterly
  • Demography
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine

In 2013, Geronimus was recognized as a member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), which highlights their role within the scientific and medical research community.

Best Publications

  • “Weathering” and Age Patterns of Allostatic Load Scores Among Blacks and Whites in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus;Margaret Hicken;Danya Keene;John Bound

  • The weathering hypothesis and the health of African-American women and infants: evidence and speculations.

    A T Geronimus

  • The Socioeconomic Consequences of Teen Childbearing Reconsidered

    Arline T. Geronimus;Sanders Korenman

  • Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight : a population-based test of the weathering hypothesis

    Arline T. Geronimus

  • Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States.

    Arline T. Geronimus

  • Use of Census-based Aggregate Variables to Proxy for Socioeconomic Group: Evidence from National Samples

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound

  • Excess Mortality among Blacks and Whites in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound;John Bound;Timothy A. Waidmann;Marianne M. Hillemeier

  • Do US Black Women Experience Stress-Related Accelerated Biological Aging?: A Novel Theory and First Population-Based Test of Black-White Differences in Telomere Length

    Arline T. Geronimus;Margaret T. Hicken;Jay A. Pearson;Sarah J. Seashols

  • Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women's health in the United States: the role of the weathering conceptual framework.

    Arline T. Geronimus

  • To mitigate, resist, or undo: addressing structural influences on the health of urban populations.

    Arline T. Geronimus

  • On Teenage Childbearing and Neonatal Mortality in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus

  • Racial Discrimination, John Henryism, and Depression Among African Americans

    Darrell L. Hudson;Harold W. Neighbors;Arline T. Geronimus;James S. Jackson

  • On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound;Lisa J. Neidert

  • Life Course Approaches to the Causes of Health Disparities.

    Nancy L. Jones;Stephen E. Gilman;Tina L. Cheng;Stacy S. Drury

  • Does Young Maternal Age Adversely Affect Child Development? Evidence from Cousin Comparisons in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus;Sanders Korenman;Marianne M. Hillemeier

  • Race-Ethnicity, Poverty, Urban Stressors, and Telomere Length in a Detroit Community-based Sample:

    Arline T. Geronimus;Jay A. Pearson;Erin Linnenbringer;Amy J. Schulz

  • Are benefits conferred with greater socioeconomic position undermined by racial discrimination among African American men

    Darrell L. Hudson;Kai M. Bullard;Harold W. Neighbors;Arline T. Geronimus

  • Inequality in Life Expectancy, Functional Status, and Active Life Expectancy Across Selected Black and White Populations in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound;Timothy A. Waidmann;Cynthia G. Colen

  • Change in birth outcomes among infants born to Latina mothers after a major immigration raid

    Nicole L Novak;Arline T Geronimus;Aresha M Martinez-Cardoso

  • What teen mothers know.

    Arline T. Geronimus

Frequent Co-Authors

John Bound
John Bound University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert C. Gee
Gilbert C. Gee University of California, Los Angeles
Marianne M. Hillemeier
Marianne M. Hillemeier Pennsylvania State University
Sherman A. James
Sherman A. James Duke University
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Danny Dorling
Danny Dorling University of Oxford
Harold W. Neighbors
Harold W. Neighbors University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Katrina M. Walsemann
Katrina M. Walsemann University of Maryland, College Park
Derek M. Griffith
Derek M. Griffith University of Pennsylvania
Amy J. Schulz
Amy J. Schulz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and professional tracks. Many students begin by searching for cheapest online psychology degree options, which offer a solid foundation for roles in counseling, research, or human services.

For those interested in social work, there are flexible online msw programs that prioritize accessibility, allowing students with diverse backgrounds to take the next step in their careers.

Individuals hoping to advance to licensure as psychologists should consider part time psyd programs. These online offerings are tailored for working professionals and allow for a balance between employment and advanced study.

Specialized pathways, such as counseling marriage and families, are also accessible via mft programs. These programs enable students to fast-track their journey into meaningful careers in therapy and family support services.

Choosing an online degree can increase flexibility, lower costs, and open pathways to rewarding careers in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Arline T. Geronimus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles