World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5265 4940 2840 2631 461 55471

Chester A. Mathis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chester A. Mathis between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chester A. Mathis published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2008. 35 of the 531 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2008. 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 17 publications
1983 2025

531 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chester A. Mathis: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 3
1984 0
1985 5
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 6
1999 6
2000 4
2001 9
2002 11
2003 9
2004 19
2005 27
2006 31
2007 28
2008 33
2009 30
2010 19
2011 23
2012 33
2013 22
2014 21
2015 15
2016 17
2017 15
2018 17
2019 15
2020 14
2021 18
2022 15
2023 19
2024 18
2025 17
Total 531
Download as CSV

Chester A. Mathis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester A. Mathis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 461 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 461
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Chester A. Mathis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester A. Mathis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Chester A. Mathis is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily centers on medicine, with a significant focus on psychiatry and mental health, physiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology.

The scientist's research encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Frailty in Older Adults

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition," 2022, Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
  • "Longitudinal Associations of Blood Phosphorylated Tau181 and Neurofilament Light Chain With Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer Disease," 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • "Characterizing Heterogeneity in Neuroimaging, Cognition, Clinical Symptoms, and Genetics Among Patients With Late-Life Depression," 2022, JAMA Psychiatry

Chester A. Mathis has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • John C. Morris
  • Michael Donohue
  • Andrew J. Saykin
  • Laurel Beckett
  • Karen Crawford

The scientist has published extensively in certain venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • GeroScience
  • Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Best Publications

  • Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B.

    William E. Klunk;Henry Engler;Agneta Nordberg;Yanming Wang

  • Molecular, Structural, and Functional Characterization of Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for a Relationship between Default Activity, Amyloid, and Memory

    Randy L. Buckner;Abraham Z. Snyder;Benjamin J. Shannon;Gina LaRossa

  • Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Robert H. Mach;Sang-Yoon Lee

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

  • The Centiloid Project: Standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET

    William E. Klunk;William E. Klunk;Robert A. Koeppe;Julie C. Price;Tammie L. Benzinger;Tammie L. Benzinger

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • SYNTHESIS AND EVALUATION OF 11C-LABELED 6-SUBSTITUTED 2-ARYLBENZOTHIAZOLES AS AMYLOID IMAGING AGENTS

    Chester A. Mathis;Yanming Wang;Daniel P. Holt;Guo Feng Huang

  • Post-mortem Correlates of in Vivo PiB-PET Amyloid Imaging in a Typical Case of Alzheimer's Disease

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;William E. Klunk;Eric E. Abrahamson;Chester A. Mathis

  • 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Clifford R. Jack;Val J. Lowe;Matthew L. Senjem;Stephen D. Weigand

  • C-11-PiB PET assessment of change in fibrillar amyloid-beta load in patients with Alzheimer's disease treated with bapineuzumab: a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study

    Juha O Rinne;David J Brooks;Martin N Rossor;Nick C Fox

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Aβ and Cognition in Aging and Alzheimer Disease

    Victor L Villemagne;Kerryn E Pike;Gaël Chételat;Kathryn A Ellis

  • Fibrillar amyloid-β burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen;Xiaofen Liu;Daniel Bandy

  • Beta-amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    Kerryn Elizabeth Pike;Gregory Raymond Savage;Victor L Villemagne;Steven Ng

  • Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria

    Wayne C. Drevets;Clara H. Gautier;Julie C Price;David J. Kupfer

  • PET imaging of serotonin 1A receptor binding in depression

    Wayne C Drevets;Ellen Frank;Julie C Price;David J Kupfer

  • Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B:

    Julie C Price;William E Klunk;Brian J Lopresti;Xueling Lu

  • Cortical cholinergic function is more severely affected in parkinsonian dementia than in Alzheimer disease: an in vivo positron emission tomographic study.

    Nicolaas I. Bohnen;Daniel I. Kaufer;Larry S. Ivanco;Brian Lopresti

  • Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis.

    Brian J. Lopresti;William E. Klunk;Chester A. Mathis;Jessica A. Hoge

  • Uncharged thioflavin-T derivatives bind to amyloid-beta protein with high affinity and readily enter the brain.

    William E. Klunk;Yanming Wang;Guo feng Huang;Manik L. Debnath

Frequent Co-Authors

William E. Klunk
William E. Klunk University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh
Oscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez University of Pittsburgh
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Milos D. Ikonomovic
Milos D. Ikonomovic University of Pittsburgh
Carolyn C. Meltzer
Carolyn C. Meltzer Emory University
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA opens doors to a variety of related degrees and pathways, many of which are available entirely online. These programs can help students fast-track their careers, specialize further, or transition into new healthcare roles.

For those interested in the management side of healthcare, a healthcare administration accelerated degree enables students to quickly gain essential leadership and operational skills. Meanwhile, nurses looking to advance can consider asn to fnp programs that bridge the gap between an associate’s degree and nurse practitioner qualifications.

Another growing field is nutrition. online nutrition degree programs are ideal for those keen on dietetics, wellness coaching, or public health. For individuals seeking high-level administrative roles, cahme accredited online mha programs offer rigorous, reputable education in healthcare management.

These related online degrees not only support diverse career goals, but also provide flexible learning options for students balancing work, family, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Chester A. Mathis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles