World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 134 2097 1953 1185 1087 814 104259

Burton E. Sobel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Burton E. Sobel between 1965 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Burton E. Sobel published across 55 years, from 1965 to 2019, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 1987. 1 of the 823 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 1987. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 5 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 15 publications 1973: 16 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 15 publications 1976: 28 publications 1977: 21 publications 1978: 21 publications 1979: 14 publications 1980: 24 publications 1981: 29 publications 1982: 28 publications 1983: 24 publications 1984: 29 publications 1985: 29 publications 1986: 21 publications 1987: 30 publications 1988: 27 publications 1989: 28 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 29 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1965 2019

823 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Burton E. Sobel: publications per year, 1965 to 2019
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 2
1967 1
1968 2
1969 4
1970 5
1971 5
1972 15
1973 16
1974 9
1975 15
1976 28
1977 21
1978 21
1979 14
1980 24
1981 29
1982 28
1983 24
1984 29
1985 29
1986 21
1987 30
1988 27
1989 28
1990 23
1991 22
1992 29
1993 18
1994 14
1995 12
1996 15
1997 11
1998 14
1999 17
2000 11
2001 13
2002 18
2003 27
2004 24
2005 16
2006 22
2007 12
2008 12
2009 18
2010 12
2011 13
2012 10
2013 4
2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 1
2018 0
2019 1
Total 823
Download as CSV

Burton E. Sobel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burton E. Sobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 814 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 814
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Burton E. Sobel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burton E. Sobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 134
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Burton E. Sobel is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on scientific research and scholarship within their institutional context.

There is no detailed information available on specific research topics, fields of study, or subfields linked directly to Burton E. Sobel. Similarly, no records of frequent co-authors or primary publication venues have been provided.

There are no listed recent papers authored by Burton E. Sobel, nor any documented book publications that would shed light on the scope or direction of their academic contributions.

Information on awards or honors received by Burton E. Sobel is not available. The data also confirms that this scientist is currently living, with no indications otherwise.

Given the absence of specific research topics, co-author networks, and publication metrics, the professional scope of Burton E. Sobel cannot be further detailed based on the available data.

Best Publications

  • Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)

    Scott M. Grundy;David Bilheimer;Alan Chait;Luther T. Clark

  • A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.

    L. Frye;Phyllis August;Regina M. Hardi;Sheryl F. Kelsey

  • Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction

    J. E. Muller;P. H. Stone;Z. G. Turi;J. D. Rutherford

  • Factors Influencing Infarct Size Following Experimental Coronary Artery Occlusions

    Peter R. Maroko;John K. Kjekshus;Burton E. Sobel;Tan Watanabe

  • Quantitative assessment of the extent of myocardial infarction in the conscious dog by means of analysis of serial changes in serum creatine phosphokinase activity

    William E. Shell;John K. Kjekshus;Burton E. Sobel

  • TROGLITAZONE IMPROVES DEFECTS IN INSULIN ACTION, INSULIN SECRETION, OVARIAN STEROIDOGENESIS, AND FIBRINOLYSIS IN WOMEN WITH POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME

    David A. Ehrmann;David J. Schneider;Burton E. Sobel;Melissa K. Cavaghan

  • Amphipathic metabolites and membrane dysfunction in ischemic myocardium.

    P B Corr;R W Gross;B E Sobel

  • Alpha adrenergic contributions to dysrhythmia during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in cats.

    Desmond J. Sheridan;Patricia A. Penkoske;Burton E. Sobel;Peter B. Corr

  • Coronary Artery Reperfusion

    P. R. Maroko;Peter Libby;W. R. Ginks;C. M. Bloor

  • Coronary thrombolysis with recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

    D Collen;E J Topol;A J Tiefenbrunn;H K Gold

  • Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O.

    S. R. Bergmann;K. A. A. Fox;A. L. Rand;K. D. Mcelvany

  • An improved basis for enzymatic estimation of infarct size.

    R Roberts;P D Henry;B E Sobel

  • Coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with evolving myocardial infarction.

    F. Van De Werf;P. A. Ludbrook;S. R. Bergmann;A. J. Tiefenbrunn

  • Myocardial contracture and accumulation of mitochondrial calcium in ischemic rabbit heart

    P. D. Henry;R. Schuchleib;J. Davis;E. S. Weiss

  • Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Rolf M. Gunnar;Patrick D.V. Bourdillon;Donald W. Dixon;Valentin Fuster

  • The influence of location and extent of myocardial infarction on long-term ventricular dysrhythmia and mortality.

    E M Geltman;A A Ehsani;M K Campbell;K Schechtman

  • Factors Responsible for Impaired Fibrinolysis in Obese Subjects and NIDDM Patients

    Janet B McGill;David J Schneider;Cynthia L Arfken;Charles L Lucore

  • Accumulation of lysophosphoglycerides with arrhythmogenic properties in ischemic myocardium.

    Burton E. Sobel;Peter B. Corr;Alice K. Robison;Richard A. Goldstein

  • Reduction of Experimental Myocardial Infarct Size by Corticosteroid Administration

    Peter Libby;Peter R. Maroko;Colin M. Bloor;Burton E. Sobel

  • Increased Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1 in Coronary Artery Atherectomy Specimens From Type 2 Diabetic Compared With Nondiabetic Patients A Potential Factor Predisposing to Thrombosis and Its Persistence

    Burton E. Sobel;Janet Woodcock-Mitchell;David J. Schneider;Robert E. Holt

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas J. Taatjes
Douglas J. Taatjes University of Vermont
Michael J. Welch
Michael J. Welch Washington University in St. Louis
Jeffrey E. Saffitz
Jeffrey E. Saffitz Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Richard W. Gross
Richard W. Gross Washington University in St. Louis
Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Hiroyuki Tsutsui Kyushu University
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
James E. Muller
James E. Muller Brigham and Women's Hospital
Allan S. Jaffe
Allan S. Jaffe Mayo Clinic
Richard E. Pratley
Richard E. Pratley Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in allied health careers or want alternative pathways in the medical field, online degrees can be a cost-effective and flexible option. Many students explore medical billing and coding, which offers entry into healthcare administration without the lengthy commitment of medical school. Curious about expenses? Find out how much does it cost to become a medical coder to determine if this career aligns with your budget and goals.

For those looking at nursing, affordability is often a key concern. If you're exploring advanced practice roles, you might ask what the cheapest np school is for your needs. Similarly, students seeking entry-level or RN degrees often search what is the cheapest online college for nursing? to find the best value.

Experienced nurses considering academic or leadership roles may benefit from doctoral study. There are now multiple online phd nursing programs that let you advance your education while continuing to work. Exploring these options can open up specialized career opportunities and take your medical journey in exciting new directions.

Best Scientists Citing Burton E. Sobel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles