World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
41265
World Ranking
7330
National Ranking
3838

Jeffrey E. Saffitz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey E. Saffitz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 401 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeffrey E. Saffitz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey E. Saffitz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Jeffrey E. Saffitz is affiliated with the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a concentration on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, orthopedics and sports medicine, surgery, molecular biology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Some of Jeffrey E. Saffitz's recent papers feature the following:

  • Exercise triggers CAPN1-mediated AIF truncation, inducing myocyte cell death in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, 2021, Science Translational Medicine
  • CITED4 Protects Against Adverse Remodeling in Response to Physiological and Pathological Stress, 2020, Circulation Research
  • Altered Electrical, Biomolecular, and Immunologic Phenotypes in a Novel Patient-Derived Stem Cell Model of Desmoglein-2 Mutant ARVC, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • GJA1-20k Rescues Cx43 Localization and Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy, 2023, Circulation Research
  • NFĸB signaling drives myocardial injury via CCR2+ macrophages in a preclinical model of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, 2024, Journal of Clinical Investigation

The scientist's frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephen P. Chelko
  • Vinay Penna
  • Angeliki Asimaki
  • Morgan Engel
  • Kory J. Lavine

Jeffrey E. Saffitz has published extensively in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Throughout their career, Saffitz has focused research efforts on cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and the effects of exercise on cardiovascular physiology, contributing to an understanding of molecular and immunologic mechanisms underlying these conditions.

An award associated with the scientist includes membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ coactivator-1 promotes cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis

    John J. Lehman;Philip M. Barger;Attila Kovacs;Jeffrey E. Saffitz

  • PGC-1alpha deficiency causes multi-system energy metabolic derangements: muscle dysfunction, abnormal weight control and hepatic steatosis.

    Teresa C Leone;John J Lehman;Brian N Finck;Paul J Schaeffer

  • A novel mouse model of lipotoxic cardiomyopathy.

    Hsiu-Chiang Chiu;Attila Kovacs;David A. Ford;Fong-Fu Hsu

  • 2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

    Jeffrey A. Towbin;William J. McKenna;Dominic J. Abrams;Michael J. Ackerman

  • The M cell: its contribution to the ECG and to normal and abnormal electrical function of the heart.

    C Antzelevitch;W Shimizu;G X Yan;S Sicouri

  • Dephosphorylation and Intracellular Redistribution of Ventricular Connexin43 During Electrical Uncoupling Induced by Ischemia

    Michael A. Beardslee;Deborah L. Lerner;Peter N. Tadros;James G. Laing

  • Evidence for Cardiomyocyte Repopulation by Extracardiac Progenitors in Transplanted Human Hearts

    Michael A. Laflamme;David Myerson;Jeffrey E. Saffitz;Charles E. Murry

  • A gender-related defect in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis in peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha- deficient mice.

    Fatima Djouadi;Carla J. Weinheimer;Jeffrey E. Saffitz;Clovis Pitchford

  • Rapid Turnover of Connexin43 in the Adult Rat Heart

    Michael A. Beardslee;James G. Laing;Eric C. Beyer;Jeffrey E. Saffitz

  • 2011 Consensus statement on endomyocardial biopsy from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology

    Ornella Leone;John P. Veinot;Annalisa Angelini;Ulrik T. Baandrup

  • Cardiac-Specific Induction of the Transcriptional Coactivator Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Coactivator-1α Promotes Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Reversible Cardiomyopathy in a Developmental Stage-Dependent Manner

    Laurie K. Russell;Carolyn M. Mansfield;John J. Lehman;Attila Kovacs

  • Phospholamban R14del mutation in patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy or arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Evidence supporting the concept of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

    Paul A. van der Zwaag;Ingrid A. W. van Rijsingen;Angeliki Asimaki;Jan D. H. Jongbloed

  • A New Diagnostic Test for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

    Angeliki Asimaki;Harikrishna Tandri;Hayden Huang;Marc K. Halushka

  • The in vivo role of p38 MAP kinases in cardiac remodeling and restrictive cardiomyopathy.

    Pu Liao;Dimitrios Georgakopoulos;Attila Kovacs;Meizi Zheng

  • Remodeling of myocyte gap junctions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy due to a deletion in plakoglobin (Naxos disease)

    Starr R Kaplan;Joseph J Gard;Nikos Protonotarios;Adalena Tsatsopoulou

  • Tissue-specific determinants of anisotropic conduction velocity in canine atrial and ventricular myocardium.

    J E Saffitz;H L Kanter;K G Green;T K Tolley

  • Early-onset multifocal inflammation in the transforming growth factor beta 1-null mouse is lymphocyte mediated.

    Ronald J. Diebold;Michael J. Eis;Moying Yin;Ilona Ormsby

  • A New Diagnostic Test For Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

    A Asimaki;H Tandri;H Huang;M Halushka

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Schuessler
Richard B. Schuessler Washington University in St. Louis
Eric C. Beyer
Eric C. Beyer University of Chicago
Hugh Calkins
Hugh Calkins Johns Hopkins University
William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
Gaetano Thiene
Gaetano Thiene University of Padua
Burton E. Sobel
Burton E. Sobel Washington University in St. Louis
Daniel P. Judge
Daniel P. Judge Medical University of South Carolina
Cristina Basso
Cristina Basso University of Padua
Thomas L. Spray
Thomas L. Spray Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Calum A. MacRae
Calum A. MacRae Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to many online degree options and career pathways. For those already working as registered nurses, the cheapest rn to bsn program online can help you advance your qualifications without incurring excessive student debt. These affordable programs are designed to fit around a nurse’s busy schedule.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and want to transition into nursing, consider the direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These accelerated online routes are ideal for career changers seeking to quickly enter advanced clinical roles.

Aspiring nurses worried about strict admission requirements can benefit from direct admit nursing programs. These schools typically offer more flexible acceptance criteria, making it easier for passionate students to join nursing programs.

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond patient care, becoming a medical coding or billing specialist is a popular alternative. Look for accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to ensure your credentials are recognized and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey E. Saffitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles