World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
27384
World Ranking
14124
National Ranking
748

Ernst J. Rummeny publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst J. Rummeny sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 783 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ernst J. Rummeny D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst J. Rummeny sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ernst J. Rummeny is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Medicine and Engineering. Their work focuses extensively on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging as well as Biomedical Engineering, with additional involvement in Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist has published numerous papers, engaging with topics such as Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, and Radiation Dose and Imaging. Other areas of research include Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research, and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging.

Recent papers by Ernst J. Rummeny include:

  • X-ray dark-field chest imaging for detection and quantification of emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a diagnostic accuracy study, 2021, The Lancet Digital Health
  • A randomized trial of risk-adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men-Results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial, 2022, International Journal of Cancer
  • Gold Nanoparticle Mediated Multi-Modal CT Imaging of Hsp70 Membrane-Positive Tumors, 2020, Cancers
  • Improved differentiation between primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastasis by combining dual-energy CT-derived biomarkers with conventional CT attenuation, 2020, European Radiology
  • Image processing improvements afford second-generation handheld optoacoustic imaging of breast cancer patients, 2022, Photoacoustics

Frequent co-authors associated with Ernst J. Rummeny are:

  • Daniela Pfeiffer
  • Franz Pfeiffer
  • Alexander A. Fingerle
  • Andreas Sauter
  • Julia Herzen

Their work has been published in various scientific venues, with repeated contributions to the following journals:

  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • Scientific Reports
  • European Journal of Radiology
  • European Radiology
  • Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express

Best Publications

  • Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain--an fMRI analysis.

    Michael Valet;Till Sprenger;Henning Boecker;Frode Willoch

  • Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson's disease before and after levodopa.

    B. Haslinger;P. Erhard;N. Kämpfe;H. Boecker

  • First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses

    Alexander Drzezga;Michael Souvatzoglou;Matthias Eiber;Ambros J. Beer

  • Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET.

    Heike E. Daldrup-Link;Christiane Franzius;Thomas M. Link;Daniela Laukamp

  • Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique.

    Melanie Bruegel;Konstantin Holzapfel;Jochen Gaa;Klaus Woertler

  • Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.

    P Reimer;E J Rummeny;K Shamsi;T Balzer

  • Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging.

    K Wernecke;E Rummeny;G Bongartz;P Vassallo

  • Capacity of human monocytes to phagocytose approved iron oxide MR contrast agents in vitro.

    Stephan Metz;Gabriel Bonaterra;Martina Rudelius;Marcus Settles

  • Targeting of hematopoietic progenitor cells with MR contrast agents.

    Heike E Daldrup-Link;Martina Rudelius;Robert A J Oostendorp;Marcus Settles

  • Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes

    Konstantin Holzapfel;Sabrina Duetsch;Claudius Fauser;Matthias Eiber

  • Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study

    Stefan Huber-Wagner;Peter Biberthaler;Sandra Häberle;Matthias Wierer

  • FDG-PET for detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors: Comparison with spiral CT

    C. Franzius;H. E. Daldrup-Link;J. Sciuk;E. J. Rummeny

  • Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists.

    Bernhard Haslinger;Peter Erhard;Eckart Altenmüller;Andreas Hennenlotter

  • Migration of iron oxide-labeled human hematopoietic progenitor cells in a mouse model: in vivo monitoring with 1.5-T MR imaging equipment.

    Heike E. Daldrup-Link;Martina Rudelius;Guido Piontek;Stephan Metz

  • Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) of Human Breast Cancer.

    Gael Diot;Stephan Metz;Aurelia Noske;Evangelos Liapis

  • Clinical results with Resovist: a phase 2 clinical trial.

    P Reimer;E J Rummeny;H E Daldrup;T Balzer

  • Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging--a multicenter phase III clinical study.

    J Petersein;A Spinazzi;A Giovagnoni;P Soyer

  • Anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of MR arthrography in the classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous injuries.

    Simone Waldt;Andreas Burkart;Andreas B Imhoff;Melanie Bruegel

  • Primary liver tumors: diagnosis by MR imaging

    E. Rummeny;R. Weissleder;Dd D. Stark;S. Saini

  • Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria

    Katharina Marten;Florian Auer;Stefan Schmidt;Gerhard Kohl

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas M. Link
Thomas M. Link University of California, San Francisco
Franz Pfeiffer
Franz Pfeiffer Technical University of Munich
Walter Heindel
Walter Heindel University of Münster
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Felix Eckstein
Felix Eckstein Paracelsus Medical University
Andreas B. Imhoff
Andreas B. Imhoff Technical University of Munich
Stephan G. Nekolla
Stephan G. Nekolla Technical University of Munich
Jens T. Siveke
Jens T. Siveke German Cancer Research Center
Ken Herrmann
Ken Herrmann German Cancer Research Center
Hans Hauner
Hans Hauner Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine isn’t limited to traditional MD programs. There are diverse online degrees and pathways that support healthcare careers or serve as stepping stones to medical study. For those interested in health and wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition offers foundational knowledge in dietetics and wellness, opening doors to roles in healthcare, education, or public policy.

If you’re already a nurse and looking to broaden your qualifications, consider the accessible option of an rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited program. These programs often accommodate working professionals and allow you to earn a degree with no in-person clinical requirements.

For healthcare professionals aiming for leadership roles, pursuing whats the best online mha program for working adults is an ideal way to advance into management or administrative positions, offering flexibility for those balancing work and study.

Nurses aspiring to earn the highest clinical qualification can look into the shortest dnp programs online, which allow you to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently.

These online options make it possible to advance your qualifications or specialize, making them valuable additions to your medical career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst J. Rummeny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles